Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Employees and workers are often offered a compromise agreement if their employer might have breached their workplace rights, typically by unfairly dismissing them and/or by discriminating against them. The compromise agreement often states that the employee’s contract of employment will be terminate on account of their signing of the compromise agreement, and in return the employee or worker will receive consideration (compensation) for doing so.

Compromise agreements are not controversial but they can occasionally turn out to be so. If the the compromise agreement does not suit the employee or worker then they might wish to look at alternatives to signing the compromise agreement, whether or not the agreement will entail them terminating their employment. This post examines the options that an employee might have to make if they are unsatisfied with the idea of signing a compromise agreement or particular terms of the compromise agreement do not suit them.

Aversion to the concept of a compromise agreement

Some employees do not like the idea of waiving their workplace legal rights. This is understandable in certain situations, for example if the employee or worker has been sexually harassed or discriminated against and thinks that the concept of signing a compromise agreement demeans them. If an employee simply does not like the concept of compromising their workplace rights by signing the agreement then they have a number of options:

Do nothing
Litigate against their employer

The two above choices are normally really the only recourse if the employee disapproves of the concept of waiving their rights. The employee can either do nothing – disregard the possibility of entering into a compromise agreement and take the matter no further – or litigate against their employer. Generally, it is recommended that the employee does not blanket-refuse to sign a compromise agreement – litigation is a process fraught with risk and the disadvantages of doing so must be balanced against the benefits looking at the particular facts. However, should the compromise agreement offer insufficient compensation for the nature of the violation of the employee’s rights then litigation can be the best way to proceed. Negotiation is normally strongly recommended beforehand, though.

Disagreement with particular terms of the compromise agreement

Should the employee or worker disagree with specific terms of the compromise agreement then this obviously creates more room for maneuver for both the employee and their representative, should they have such. The options for the employee in such circumstances are:

Accept the compromise agreement as it is; or
Negotiate the terms of the compromise agreement; or
Reject the compromise agreement and commence litigation against their employer

The first option evidently is not preferable for the employee in the majority of circumstances if they’re dissatisfied with the terms of the compromise agreement. However, if an employee disagrees with trivial terms of the compromise agreement (for example, they wish to leave their employment one day before the specified date) but the over-all terms of the agreement are advantageous to the employee then it may be recommended that the employee is flexible in their negotiating stance so that an the matter can be settled. If terms of the agreement which are of distinct significance to the employee are disagreeable then it is not advised that the employee enter into the agreement, although this depends on the particular facts of the case. An obvious thing to consider is the strength of the legal position of both parties.

Negotiation of the terms of the agreement is almost always recommended, unless both parties are happy with the terms of the contract. Careful examination of the compromise agreement and miscellaneous contractual documents (such as the contract of employment, restrictive covenants etc.) is always required to determine whether unreasonable burdens are being placed on the employee and to ascertain that the terms of the agreement are not unfavourable to the employee.

As above, rejection of the compromise agreement and recourse to litigation through the Employment Tribunal or civil courts is not a decision that should be taken lightly. The benefits of the compromise agreement (speed of payment, finality etc.) should be weighed against the advantages of litigation (potential satisfaction for the client, amount of compensation etc.)

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.72 Average

89 Reviews

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 6 days ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 2 months ago