Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Employees and workers are often offered a compromise agreement if their employer might have breached their workplace rights, typically by unfairly dismissing them and/or by discriminating against them. The compromise agreement often states that the employee’s contract of employment will be terminate on account of their signing of the compromise agreement, and in return the employee or worker will receive consideration (compensation) for doing so.

Compromise agreements are not controversial but they can occasionally turn out to be so. If the the compromise agreement does not suit the employee or worker then they might wish to look at alternatives to signing the compromise agreement, whether or not the agreement will entail them terminating their employment. This post examines the options that an employee might have to make if they are unsatisfied with the idea of signing a compromise agreement or particular terms of the compromise agreement do not suit them.

Aversion to the concept of a compromise agreement

Some employees do not like the idea of waiving their workplace legal rights. This is understandable in certain situations, for example if the employee or worker has been sexually harassed or discriminated against and thinks that the concept of signing a compromise agreement demeans them. If an employee simply does not like the concept of compromising their workplace rights by signing the agreement then they have a number of options:

Do nothing
Litigate against their employer

The two above choices are normally really the only recourse if the employee disapproves of the concept of waiving their rights. The employee can either do nothing – disregard the possibility of entering into a compromise agreement and take the matter no further – or litigate against their employer. Generally, it is recommended that the employee does not blanket-refuse to sign a compromise agreement – litigation is a process fraught with risk and the disadvantages of doing so must be balanced against the benefits looking at the particular facts. However, should the compromise agreement offer insufficient compensation for the nature of the violation of the employee’s rights then litigation can be the best way to proceed. Negotiation is normally strongly recommended beforehand, though.

Disagreement with particular terms of the compromise agreement

Should the employee or worker disagree with specific terms of the compromise agreement then this obviously creates more room for maneuver for both the employee and their representative, should they have such. The options for the employee in such circumstances are:

Accept the compromise agreement as it is; or
Negotiate the terms of the compromise agreement; or
Reject the compromise agreement and commence litigation against their employer

The first option evidently is not preferable for the employee in the majority of circumstances if they’re dissatisfied with the terms of the compromise agreement. However, if an employee disagrees with trivial terms of the compromise agreement (for example, they wish to leave their employment one day before the specified date) but the over-all terms of the agreement are advantageous to the employee then it may be recommended that the employee is flexible in their negotiating stance so that an the matter can be settled. If terms of the agreement which are of distinct significance to the employee are disagreeable then it is not advised that the employee enter into the agreement, although this depends on the particular facts of the case. An obvious thing to consider is the strength of the legal position of both parties.

Negotiation of the terms of the agreement is almost always recommended, unless both parties are happy with the terms of the contract. Careful examination of the compromise agreement and miscellaneous contractual documents (such as the contract of employment, restrictive covenants etc.) is always required to determine whether unreasonable burdens are being placed on the employee and to ascertain that the terms of the agreement are not unfavourable to the employee.

As above, rejection of the compromise agreement and recourse to litigation through the Employment Tribunal or civil courts is not a decision that should be taken lightly. The benefits of the compromise agreement (speed of payment, finality etc.) should be weighed against the advantages of litigation (potential satisfaction for the client, amount of compensation etc.)

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.63 Average

30 Reviews

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 2 months ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 3 months ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 3 months ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 3 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 7 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 7 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 7 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 8 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 8 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 8 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 8 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 8 months ago