Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of latest of our series of posts from the Employment Tribunal ‘case archive’ we take a look at the case of Streatfeild v London Philharmonic Orchestra Ltd ET/2390772/2011. In this case an Employment Tribunal held that an employee’s belief in “humanism” could constitute a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010 but, however, she had not been discriminated against because of that belief.

The facts in Streatfeild v London Philharmonic Orchestra Ltd

Ms Streatfield was a violinist with the London Philharmonic Orchestra (“LPO”). In 2011 her name was on a letter published by the Independent newspaper protesting against an invitation to the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra to perform at the 2011 Proms. On the letter Ms Streatfield’s name was followed by the identifying name of “LPO”.

The letter, and the invitation of the Israel Philarmonic Orchestra, received a large amount of media coverage. Disciplinary proceedings were commenced against Ms Streatfeild and she was suspended on full pay for six months on the basis that she had caused serious damage to the LPO’s reputation.

Ms Streatfeild brought claims in the Employment Tribunal for discrimination, victimisation, and harassment on the ground of a philosophical belief, “humanism”.

The LPO applied to strike out Ms Streatfeild’s claims on the basis that they had no prospects of success and the application was heard at a preliminary hearing to determine:

  1. Whether “humanism” was capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010 as a philosophical belief
  2. If so, whether Ms Streatfield’s claims had prospects of success in the Employment Tribunal

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held, following the principles set out in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4 EAT, humanism was capable of being protected as a philosophical belief under the Equality Act 2010: it was a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available, it was a belief as to substantial and weighty aspects of human life and behaviour, and it was a belief worthy of respect in a democratic society (and not incompatible with human dignity and/or in conflict with the fundamental rights of others). The Tribunal also held that Ms Grainger genuinely held the belief: she had a “long-held” belief in humanism, which was demonstrated in her education, her choice of partner, and the manner in which she had educated her children.

The Employment Tribunal held, however, that Ms Streatfield could not have been treated less favourably than other employees because of her beliefs because there was nothing in the disciplinary process to suggest that the relevant directors had been aware of Ms Streatfeild’s humanist beliefs. This lack of knowledge meant that Ms Streatfeild’s claim for direct discrimination was bound to fail and the Tribunal struck it out as having “no reasonable prospects of success”.

In respect of the victimisation claim, the Tribunal held that Ms Streatfeild would have great difficulty in arguing that the treatment she had been subjected to (her suspension) had been undertaken because of her beliefs, rather than (as the LPO argued) the fact that she had publicly criticised an event her employer was involved with in a national newspaper. The Tribunal applied the same reasoning to her claim for harassment and, for this purpose, ordered that Ms Streatfeild must pay a deposit order of £250 to continue with her claims (on the basis that they had “little reasonable prospect of success”.

Our solicitors’ comments on the case

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case demonstrates two main issues: 1) that a belief in humanism is capable of protection under the Equality Act 2010; and 2) that, in order for an employee to succeed with an argument that they have been discriminated against because of a protected characteristic they must first succeed in showing that the employer was aware of said characteristic.”

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.67 Average

66 Reviews

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 4 weeks ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 1 month ago