Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of c UKEAT/0058/17/DA the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that two non-executive directors who were materially involved in the dismissal of a whistleblowing employee were personally liable for for their part in the dismissal.

Summary

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld an Employment Tribunal’s decision that two non-executives who were materially involved in the dismissal of an employee because he had ‘blown the whistle’ were personally liable for the dismissal and, further, jointly and severally liable with the employer for the employee’s losses flowing from the dismissal.

The consequences of this decision are that senior management dismissing employees because of protected disclosures the employee has made (and any other employee involved in the decision to dismiss) could be personally liable for the dismissal, as well as the financial losses that the dismissed employee suffers.

The facts in International Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Osipov & Ors

International Petroleum Limited (“IPL”) was an oil and gas company involved in oil and gas exploration in Niger. Mr Osipov commenced employment with IPL on 23 February 2011 and was appointed to the position of CEO in June 2014; shortly after this Mr Osipov submitted a number of protected disclosures (colloquially known as ‘blowing the whistle’) which he alleged led to certain detriments to him including, eventually, his dismissal by Mr Timis and Mr Sage (two non-executive directors of IPL).

Subsequent to his dismissal Mr Osipov brought Employment Tribunal claims against Mr Timis, Mr Sage, and IPL for unfair dismissal, detriment due to protected disclosure, and automatic unfair dismissal (essentially a complaint that he had been dismissed because he had made protected disclosures).

The Employment Tribunal upheld Mr Osipov’s claims, holding that Mr Osipov had submitted protected disclosures and that he had been subjected to various detriments (including, but not limited to, dismissal) as a result of those disclosures. The Tribunal awarded Mr Ospiov £1.7 million as compensation for his dismissal against Mr Timis, Mr Sage, and IPL on a joint and several basis, meaning that they were all equally liable to pay the full amount of compensation.

Mr Timis and Mr Sage appealed the Employment Tribunal’s decision, arguing that, although it was permissible for the Tribunal to find that they had submitted Mr Opisov to detriments, it was an error of law for the Tribunal to allow Mr Opisov to bring a detriment claim where the detriment is dismissal. They also argued that it was an error of law for the Tribunal to hold that they should be liable for post-dismissal losses (although, again, they agreed that it was permissible for the Tribunal to find that they were jointly and severally liable for pre-dismissal losses).

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision

The Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissed Mr Sage and Mr Timis’ appeals, holding that there is nothing in the relevant legislation which prevents employees from bring a claim for detriment arising from protected disclosures where the detriment pleaded is dismissal. Equally, the Tribunal held that there was no error of law in holding that individuals could be personally liable for losses arising from an employee’s dismissal.

Our solicitors’ comments

This case has significant implications for both senior management of businesses and the businesses themselves.

What Osipov establishes is that dismissed  employees may bring detriment claims against former colleagues involved in their dismissal in respect of the decision to dismiss them. This is an advantage for the claimant as the burden of proof in establishing a causal link between a protected disclosure and a ‘detriment’ is less onerous (where the claimant has to show that the disclosure was a ‘material influence’ in relation to their treatment) than establishing that they were dismissed because of the disclosure (where the claimant has to show that the dismissal was the cause or the principal cause of their dismissal). Equally, this case also establishes that former colleagues involved in making the decision to dismiss could potentially be liable for a claimant’s financial losses post-dismissal.

There are also added risks to businesses, in that the employer may be held vicariously liable for the detriments (including dismissal) that its employees subject the claimant to. Businesses are able to defend themselves from such claims by establishing that they took all reasonably practicable steps to prevent the conduct in question occurring, but tangible evidence will need to be submitted of such (such as, for example, training in how to deal with protected disclosures, the establishing of policies to deal with such situations, and a commitment on the business’ (and senior management’s) part to prevent whistleblowers from being subjected to any detriment.

Directors, partners, and officers of businesses may wish to establish whether they are covered against the risk of such claims by liability insurance cover.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.67 Average

66 Reviews

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 4 weeks ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 1 month ago