Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This post examines the objectives of employee who want to leave their current employer and set up a new business in the context of UK employment law and contract law. It mainly focuses on how employees can get into trouble and what steps they should take.

The employee’s objectives:

  1. Set up and run competing business
  2. Avoid being sued

If you want to leave your current job and set up a competing business there are a number of contractual and employment law issues which may involve you in litigation in the future. Therefore the first thing to do is check your contract of employment – what are the express terms of your contract? Particularly, are there any restrictive covenants which prohibit you from engaging in certain actions for a limited period of time after your contract of employment terminates? Common restrictive covenants are:

  • Non-compete clauses
  • Garden leave clauses
  • Non-solicitation clauses

Restrictive covenants are prima facie void as they are in restraint of trade. However, the courts recognise that employers have a right to protect their commercial interests when their employees leave, especially if the employees have been party to especially sensitive information or have been exposed to particular clients. An employer can therefore utilise common commercial law restrictive covenants if it can show that:

  • It has a legitimate proprietary interest that it is appropriate to protect; and
  • The protection sought is no more than is reasonable having regard to the interest of the parties and the public interest

Non-compete clauses seek to prevent employees from engaging in a particular trade or offering particular services that would compete with their former employer after the termination of their contract. It is generally deemed unreasonable for a non-compete clause to last for longer than 12 months post-termination. The non-compete clause may limit the prohibition of competition to a specific geographic area, such as the City of London. The less restrictive the non-compete clause, the more reasonable it will be likely to be (as is the case with all restrictive covenants) in commercial law terms.

Garden leave clauses seek to prevent employees from resuming employment immediately but forces the employee to serve out their notice period away from the office. This serves two potential purposes – it protects the commercial interests of the employer and it prevents a competitor from engaging the employee and using the information that the employee has. This serves to protect the employer’s information and its goodwill with its clients.

Non-solicitation clauses seek to prevent an employee from “soliciting” the clients of their former employer after they have left employment. Employees are therefore generally prevented from contacting clients that they had business dealings with at their previous employer in the (normally) 24 months prior to the termination of the contract of employment. The length of the non-solicitation period is normally up to 12 months but sometimes as little as 3 months.

As well as being subject to any express restrictive covenants in (or annexed to) the contract of employment, employees also have a number of implied duties towards their employer, such as the duty to maintain confidentiality relating to trade secrets. How the line is drawn between what is a trade secret and what has is normal commercial information can sometimes be difficult to draw but employees should be wary as to what information they divulge to any person after they leave employment – the watchword is always “less said soonest mended”.

Should you receive a letter from your previous employer asserting that you are in breach of contract (because, for example, you’re competing with your employer) you should seek specialist legal advice. It’s better to be prepared than risk being caught out when it comes to litigation. However, there is a big difference between receiving a pre-claim letter and actually having proceedings issued against you – in a lot of cases the matter never gets as far as litigation but is either settled or the employer loses interest in enforcing the contract.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.68 Average

69 Reviews

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 2 days ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago