Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns the application of the fiduciary duty of loyalty and the implied contractual obligation of fidelity to an employee who has left his employer and set up his own company in competition. The Court of Appeal determined that the fiduciary duty of loyalty (which normally only applies to directors) did not apply in the circumstances and that he had not breached his contractual duty of fidelity by meeting with potential customers whilst employed by the Claimant (Customer Systems PLC) or when he competed for work after. In particular, employees (and directors in relevant circumstances) do not have a positive duty to report their own wrongdoings or breaches of contract to their employer.

The facts in Ranson v Customer Systems Plc

Mr Ranson (“the Defendant”) worked from Customer Systems PLC (“the Claimant”) from 2001 to 2009. By the time he left the Claimant he had worked his way up to a position of responsibility. However, at no time during his employment was the Defendant made a director of the Claimant. He was an employee at all times during his employment. Before and during the expiry of his notice period Mr Ranson made preparations for the establishment of a competing business, Praesto Consulting (UK) Ltd (“Praesto”). The Defendant had no post-termination restrictive covenants contained within his contract of employment so the Defendant was unable to object to the establishment of the competing business. However, the Claimant did object to Mr Ranson not telling it that he had had dinner with a client in February 2009 (2 days prior to his leaving) where future work for Mr Ranson was discussed. The Claimant asserted that this was both a breach of the contractual duty of fidelity and the fiduciary duty of loyalty. The High Court found that this was indeed the case and that Mr Ranson had breached his contractual duty of fidelity and his fiduciary duty of loyalty. Mr Ranson appealed these two points.

The law relating to fiduciary obligations and whether they apply to employees

As a general principle, the employee’s contractual duty of fidelity does not prevent him from competing with a former employer once he has left employment, and he is free to prepare for the establishment of a competing business prior to the termination of his contract of employment (Helmet Integrated Systems Ltd v Tunnard).

Fiduciary duties are not contractual in nature – they are equitable. They normally apply to directors of companies as a result of the fact that they are in a position of trust. However, senior employees can be subject to a fiduciary duty if they have a contractual obligation that signifies this or in exceptional circumstances. One of the common law fiduciary duties (for there are a number of statutory fiduciary duties contained within the Companies Act 2006) is that of the fiduciary duty of loyalty. Those subject to the fiduciary duty of loyalty have a single-minded duty to act in the interests of their company. Those subject to a fiduciary duty must therefore not act in a manner that would contravene the interests of their company. Employees are generally not subject to such a strong loyalty. Further, this duty of loyalty does not extend to reporting one’s own wrongdoings or contractual breaches – for directors or employees. Such an obligation must normally be contractual in nature.

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Ranson v Customer Systems Plc

The Court of Appeal upheld the Defendant’s appeal and found that the Defendant was neither liable contractually nor as a result of a breach of a fiduciary duty. The Defendant was entitled to prepare to set up his own business (see above) and did not have a contractual obligation to report his own wrongdoings to the Claimant. Thus there was no breach of contract. Further, the Defendant was not in a position of fiduciary responsibility. Such obligations did therefore not apply to him. However, even if they did there may not have been a breach of fiduciary duty as the Defendant would not have had an obligation to report his own wrongdoing in such circumstances.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ views on Ranson v Customer Systems Plc

This is clearly a complex case. It outlines quite neatly the extent of the obligations of employees and directors to their companies and when preparing to set up your own business does and does not breach contractual and/or fiduciary duties. Further, it emphasizes the need for post-termination restrictive covenants to be included within all employees’ contracts. The failure to do so here may have cost the Claimant quite a sum of money.

 

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

2 Responses to Fiduciary duties and employees – Ranson v Customer Systems Plc

  1. […] case again shows, along with Ranson v Customer Systems plc (a Court of Appeal case just handed down) that the fact that an employee is found to be considering […]

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.73 Average

93 Reviews

Mohamed F

Excellent and professional solicitors, highly recommended

Posted 18 hours ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors provided a professional and prompt service in dealing with my settlement agreement. They used their experience to negotiate a better deal for which I am grateful for. I highly recommend their services.

Posted 3 days ago

Cheryl R

Very efficient and friendly lawyers. I have used Redmans twice now and Chris Hadrill has been amazing to work with. Would highly recommend Redmans.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

I found Redmans Solicitors to be extremely professional, dealing with my questions and concerns quickly and in detail. I would have no hesitation in recommending Redmans Solicitors to anyone.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 1 week ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 1 week ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 1 week ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 1 week ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 2 months ago