Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Doyle v Associated Training Solutions Ltd 2405460/2016  the Employment Tribunal held that Ms Doyle had been automatically unfairly dismissed and discriminated against when she was dismissed by her employer because she was pregnant.

The facts in Doyle v Associated Training Solutions Ltd

Ms Doyle commenced employment with Associated Training Solutions Ltd (“ATS”), a company which provides training for apprentices in the hairdressing industry, on 4 November 2014. Stephen Harrison was a director of ATS at all material times and Andrew Harrison was Business Director from late 2014.

In or about May 2016 Ms Doyle discovered that she was pregnant. She told a friend and colleague, but did not wish to disclose her condition to anyone else at work until after her 12-week scan.

On 14 June 2016 Ms Doyle disclosed to Mr Fairbrother that she was pregnant, but also asked him to keep this to himself as she was not ready to tell her colleagues yet (as she was only 7.5 weeks into her pregnancy).

On 5 July 2016 Ms Doyle discovered from Ms Gudgeon that Mr Fairbrother had told the Head of Operations (Yvonne Ellis) that she was pregnant. She also discovered that Ms Ellis had, on 4 July 2016, told Ms Gudgeon that she was not to be offered a work-based placement because of “the situation” (but Ms Gudgeon would be offered such). Ms Doyle subsequently discovered on 13 July 2016 that Mr Fairbrother had told other colleagues about her pregnancy.

Upon her return to work from a period of holiday Ms Doyle became concerned that Mr Fairbrother had made comments that implied that Ms Doyle should only take a short period of maternity leave, and that her impending maternity leave would be an issue for ATS.

On 22 September 2016 Ms Doyle had a discussion with a colleague, Luke Shaw, at lunch time in the staff room. In this discussion Mr Shaw told Ms Doyle that one of the students that he was responsible for (“DH”) had asked for more time to complete his course as he had recently seen the dead body of a 16-year-old boy who had committed suicide. Ms Doyle did not teach DH but told Mr Shaw that it was her opinion that DH should be given more time to complete the course, but further consideration would be needed.

On 29 September 2016 Mr Shaw told DH of the conversation that he had had with Ms Doyle, and stated to DH that Ms Doyle had implied that DH was weak for taking two weeks off from school after the incident, and that Ms Doyle had suggested that he was “milking it for paid time off work”. DH subsequently complained about this conversation and Mr Fairbrother questioned Mr Shaw about the incident. Mr Shaw stated that Ms Doyle had said that DH was “milking the system”, everyone had seen a dead body, and that DH was weak and should “man up”. Mr Shaw acknowledged that his own conduct in passing these comments on to DH was unprofessional.

On 4 October 2016 Mr Fairbrother suspended Ms Doyle from work based on the grievance that DH had raised, and she was told that a formal investigation would take place. No details of the allegations were given. Mr Shaw was not suspended from work or told to keep away from work.

On 6 October 2016 Ms Doyle raised a complaint regarding the manner in which she had been treated, suggesting that her suspension from work may be an act of discrimination.

An investigation was carried out and a grievance hearing (regarding DH’s grievance) was carried out on 7 October 2016. Ms Doyle was not invited to this hearing, nor given the chance to raise any representations regarding it, but a decision was made by Mr Fairbrother that Ms Doyle should be dismissed.

On 11 October 2016 Mr Fairbrother informed Mr Shaw that his services would no longer be required, and on 12 October 2016 he wrote to Ms Doyle to inform her that she was being dismissed for gross misconduct as a result of DH’s complaint. Ms Doyle subsequently appealed her dismissal but her appeal was rejected without an appeal hearing being held.

ATS did not carry out any risk assessment, or offer to carry out such, once it was made aware that she was pregnant.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Doyle v Associated Training Solutions Ltd

The Employment Tribunal held that the reason, or principal reason, for Ms Doyle’s dismissal was her pregnancy for the following reasons (among others):

  1. Mr Fairbrother had made comments about Ms Doyle needing to return to work early from her period of maternity leave;
  2. That Mr Fairbrother and Mr Harrison believed that Ms Doyle should not be paid statutory maternity pay after her dismissal, and the Tribunal inferred from this that ATS’s thought process was that they would save on maternity pay if they dismissed Ms Doyle
  3. The difference in treatment between Mr Shaw and Ms Doyle – he was not suspended at all, there was no mention of his dismissal being because of misconduct on his part, and he was never told that he had engaged in misconduct
  4. Differences in ATS’s defence as to what the reason for Ms Doyle’s dismissal was, and the evidence that Mr Fairbrother gave to the Tribunal as to the reasons for Ms Doyle’s dismissal

The Tribunal therefore found that Ms Doyle’s claims that her dismissal was automatically unfair (under section 99 Employment Rights Act 1996) and discriminatory (under section 18 Equality Act 2010) therefore succeeded. The Tribunal also held that Ms Doyle’s dismissal was wrongful.

The Tribunal also held that the following conduct was also discriminatory:

  • Mr Fairbrother’s comments when Ms Doyle had disclosed her pregnancy
  • Ms Doyle not being allowed to carry out work-based placements

The Tribunal ordered that a remedy hearing be held in order to determine compensation (unless the parties could agreed settlement terms).

Our solicitors’ view on Doyle v Associated Training Solutions Ltd

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “Employers must ensure that disciplinaries in the workplace are carried out fairly, promptly, and thoroughly, and that employees are given the opportunity to contest the allegations put to them – if the employer fails to carry out these basic steps then this potentially opens up the employer to claims for unfair dismissal, discrimination, and automatic unfair dismissal (as it did in this case).”

The judgment of the Employment Tribunal can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.63 Average

30 Reviews

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 1 month ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 2 months ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 2 months ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 2 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 6 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 6 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 6 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 7 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 7 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 7 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 7 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 7 months ago