Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr A Singh v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd: 1401292/2018, the Employment Tribunal held that an employer had discriminated against an employee for withholding employer’s sick pay (ESP) (the company sick pay policy).

The facts in Mr A Singh v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd

The claimant commenced employment on 1 February 2016 with the respondent as an LGV driver.  Approximately nine months later he showed signs consistent with coeliac disease.

  • In November/December 2016, the claimant made a request to be assigned to warehouse duties as his condition was temporarily causing diarrhoea. The request was declined.
  • In November 2017, an occupational health assessment was undertaken. The report indicated that the claimant should be redeployed to a temporary role for six months so that he could have access to toilet facilities.
  • His employers questioned whether Mr Singh’s adherence to a gluten free diet had been inconsistent. Mr Singh argued that sticking to the diet was very difficult while he was on the road and particularly finding meals that would meet the strict requirements of a gluten free diet.
  • On 29 November 2017, the claimant’s GP provided a medical note to say that the claimant was fit for work on the basis of adjusted duties. His employer had intended to put the claimant in a warehouse role which would require some health and safety training to be undertaken which couldn’t be done immediately.  In the interim, it was proposed that Mr Singh would undertake some litter cleaning duties.  There was no suggestion at that stage that the claimant would be paid other than his ordinary salary for this period.
  • The claimant was due to commence the interim role on 5 December 2017. On the afternoon of 4th December, the claimant was provided with a payslip which showed from 29 November onwards, the date which he had been certified as unfit for work, save in an adjusted role, the claimant had not been remunerated at ESP rate (the company sick pay rate).
  • The claimant was extremely unsettled by this. He visited his doctor at 5 pm the same day and was provided with a sick note running through to January 2018, identifying a range of conditions including coeliac disease and stress at work.
  • His employer doubted the legitimacy of the sick note or the information that the claimant had provided to his GP to obtain it. The employer questioned whether the claimant was strictly adhering to his diet and whether he had earlier been the author of his own misfortunes in being unable to perform the LGV duties.
  • His employer placed the claimant on SSP rather than ESP for the period 5 December onwards.

Conclusions and decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the claimant’s health condition, specifically coeliac disease, amounted to a disability for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010.

The Employment Tribunal further held that the decision to pay at SSP rather than ESP rate constituted “unfavourable treatment” for the purposes of the s15 complaint – the question was whether this unfavourable was something that arose in consequence of the claimant’s disability)?

The Employment Tribunal came to the conclusion that the unfavourable treatment that the claimant had suffered was in consequence of his disability based on the following:

  1. The claimant’s failure to attend work on the morning of 5 December 2018 (as a result of the effects of his disability); and
  2. The respondent’s perception that his failure to attend work was because he had failed to adhere to his recommended diet (which was not in fact the case)

The Employment Tribunal concluded that both of those reasons fell comfortably within the ambit of Section 15(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and that the treatment the claimant had been subjected to was therefore discriminatory. The Employment Tribunal further held that the respondent’s action was not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

The Employment Tribunal awarded the claimant £6,600 inclusive of interest (inclusive of a sum of £3,500 in respect of injury to feelings).

Our lawyers’ comments on the case

Melissa Chin, a Legal Executive in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “Employers must make sure that decisions that they make do not adversely affect disabled employees as a result of that employee’s condition – if employers fail to take reasonable and proportionate decisions then they may, as in this case, face a successful claim under the Equality Act 2010”.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr A Singh v NFT Distribution Operations Ltd: 1401292/2018 can be found here (judgment) and here (reasons).

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

124 Reviews

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 2 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 3 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 3 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 4 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 4 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 4 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 4 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Chris was absolutely excellent. Clear and concise, offering sound advice.

Posted 4 months ago

Tim O

Experienced and competent advisors

Posted 4 months ago

Rachel A

Quick and expert assistance. I would highly recommend Chris for any of your legal needs.

Posted 4 months ago

Joe S

I was very happy with the service provided by Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. I felt very comfortable discussing all matters with Chris and am very grateful for all the help and guidance I was given throughout the whole process. I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to friends and family!

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

I had a very good experience working with Chris Hadrill during a difficult and emotional time. This held true from the moment I spoke to him on the phone, to the end of the process. Overall, he was attentive, professional and highly supportive. He provided sound advice and clarity. It was the reviews that led me to Redmans! I was very happy to know they were all true. I highly recommend working with Redmans Solicitors. Thank-you to the entire team!

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Good service

Posted 4 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service. Highly recommend.

Posted 4 months ago

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 5 months ago