Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs J McArdle v Asco Joucomatic Ltd: 2401431/2017 the Employment Tribunal held that Mrs McArdle had been discriminated against because of her pregnancy and awarded her £7,500 in compensation.

The facts in McArdle v Asco Joucomatic Ltd

Asco Joucomatic Limited (“Asco”) makes industrial coils, valves, cylinders and cabine. Ms McArdle worked for Asco as an agency worker provided by Response Recruitment. She commenced working at Asco in 2012.

In February 2014 allegations were made by agency workers and employees that they had contracted asthma or that they had asthma that had been exacerbated by working conditions. Three employees then pursued work-related personal injury claims against the company, or at least threatened that it was their intention to do so. There was an investigation implemented in order to address the allegations, and the outcome of this investigation was that practical steps should be taken in order to see whether there was a problem, and if there is a problem how to solve it; however, this investigation only looked at respiratory disease but did not investigate the effect on those people who were susceptible to or likely to have asthma.

Asco did not have a rule about the deployment of pregnant workers on site at any point – they would deal with employees based on their particular circumstances and facts. It would, when informed that employees were pregnant, implement a standard risk assessment which stated that they may work on moulding and winding but not on soldering jobs.

On 3 October 2016 Ms McArdle informed her supervisor at work, Mr Ashworth, that she was pregnant. Mr Ashworth acknowledged this, congratulated her, and informed her that she could work on moulding as she had been doing on her previous shift. He informed her that Mr Mannion would do a risk assessment.

Later in the morning on 3 October 2016 Ms McArdle noticed labelling on a chemical compound that she was using that it was potentially harmful to the environment. She brought this to Mr Ashworth’s attention and he stated that Mr Mannion was doing a risk assessment.

Whilst Ms McArdle was working on site that day Mr Mannion approached Mrs Blackledge, the HR Manager, and asked her how he should manage the fact that hey had two pregnant agency workers on site. Mrs Blackledge contacted the agency to see what it proposed, and the agency sought advice from the Federation of Small Business and ACAS. The agency reported back to Mr Mannion and Mr Mannion started to prepare a risk assessment. He also informed Mrs Blackledge that he was going to report that there was an ongoing sampling of air, that there was no guarantee of the safety of pregnant employees, and that Asco was not in a position to offer suitable alternative work. A policy was therefore effectively implemented that Asco was not prepared to engage pregnant workers on site. Before the risk assessment was completed Mr Mannion invited Mr Davies, the manager at the agency, on to site in order to inform him that Ms McArdle’s assignment would be terminated.

Ms McArdle met with Mr Davies at 12.30pm on 3 October 2016, when Mr Davies congratulated her on being pregnant and informed her that her assignment at Asco would end immediately. Ms McArdle’s employment was therefore terminated before the risk assessment was concluded, and before there could be any consultation or discussion with Ms McArdle.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in McArdle v Asco Joucomatic Ltd

The Employment Tribunal held that Ms McArdle had been discriminated against udner section 18 of the Equality Act 2010:

  • failing to consult with her regarding the engagement of pregnant workers;
  • failing to provide a risk assessment on 3 October 2016 upon which the respondent claimed to rely, and failing to do so until 10 January 2017;
  • failing to follow a procedure or give due consideration to finding an alternative safe place of work; and
  • by terminating her assignment in the manner in which it was terminated.

The parties agreed that Asco would pay Ms McArdle £7,500 in compensation.

Our solicitors’ view on McArdle v Asco Joucomatic Ltd

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “Employers must make sure to undertake risk assessments in the workplace if they are aware that an employee is pregnant, that the employee’s work is of a nature that could involve harm or danger to the health and safety of the new or expectant mother, and that the risk arises from work processes or conditions.”

The judgment of the Employment Tribunal can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.63 Average

30 Reviews

Anonymous

Immediate response to my initial enquiry. Very clear throughout the whole process and thorough and great communication which worked really well during quite a stressful time. Chris Hadrill was extremely helpful and made me feel at ease.

Posted 5 days ago

Nick D

I received a very professional service from Chris. The advice given really helped to leave me comfortable to sign the settlement agreement following my redundancy. Would be happy to recommend your services to others.

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent service from initial contact to deliverables.

Posted 1 month ago

Virginia K

Yes, Chris Hadrill answered all my questions and I feel more confident with my current situation

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill was referred to me my a friend of mine. I found the service to be efficient, quick and like Chris's direct approach to my work. Well done and thank you Chris!

Posted 1 month ago

Andy W

Very prompt & structured service that helped put my mind at rest at a difficult time

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I have found Redmans to be very helpful, diligant and thoroughly professional when dealing with them, plus they gone that extra mile for me !

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Thank you to Chris Hadrill at Redmans for his assistance in settling my case. I contacted him at the very last minute and he was happy to help me and managed to get everything done on time and in a very professional manner. I will definitely be happy to work with him again .

Posted 2 months ago

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 5 months ago

Steven

Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 5 months ago

Dinah

Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 5 months ago

Ankar

At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 5 months ago

Anonymous

Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 6 months ago

Chris

Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 6 months ago

Dominic

Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 6 months ago

Kurt

Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 6 months ago

Anonymous

Resolved my issues

Posted 6 months ago