Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Cupid v Premier Global Ltd ET/2200235/2017 the Employment Tribunal found that a former employee who had been called “childish” after complaining of discrimination had been discriminated against, and awarded the claimant over £55,000 in compensation.

Factual background in Cupid v Premier Global Ltd

Premier Global Ltd (“Premier”) is a company that sells training and qualification courses for personal trainers.

Mr Cupid was employed from 24 August 2015 as a ‘course adviser’, a sales role in Premier’s sales team. The sales team was highly competitive and focused. Mr Cupid was provided with a contract of employment which stated that  the business operated a non-contractual disciplinary procedure. Employees would be subjected to this disciplinary procedure even if they did not have two years’ continuous employment (the threshold necessary to bring a claim for unfair dismissal).

By January 2016 Mr Cupid was hitting targets and was performing well. In his February 2016 appraisal it was noted that Mr Cupid was a quick learner, that he consistently achieved sales targets, and that he had a “calm manner”. Mr Cupid also passed his probation period at this point.

On 1 October 2016 a new Commercial Director joined the business. This new Commercial Director, Mr Williams, took a ‘no-nonsense’ approach to the business of the company and was employed to improve the company’s performance – one of the means that Mr Williams used to improve performance was to dismiss under-performing employees and, in cases where employees did not have two years’ continuous employment, to dismiss without any procedure being used.

On 20 October 2016 Mr Cupid started a shift at 8.30am. About a week previously Premier had introduced a new system to monitor employees’ performance, including monitoring telephone calls. The system showed that Mr Cupid had undertaken very few telephone calls that morning and he was called into a meeting with a couple of managers, Ms Prentice and Ms Thornton. The managers said that Mr Cupid had engaged in little sales activity that day. Mr Cupid complained that he felt that he was being unfairly singled out, and that he felt that this treatment was because of his skin colour. Ms Prentice then said to him “don’t be childish”, or words to that effect. Mr Cupid was then told that, should he wish to submit a formal complaint of discrimination, he should contact Mrs Chappell, another manager. Ms Prentice was upset by Mr Cupid’s complaint of discrimination against her – she came to the opinion that Mr Cupid was aggressive and became reticent to deal with him.

Mr Cupid decided not to submit a formal complaint of discrimination, as he was performing well and achieving bonus targets. He felt that he didn’t want to cause trouble for himself. A sales record dated 11 November 2016 showed that he continued to perform well, and it was likely that he would have received a substantial bonus.

On 15 December 2016 Mr Cupid returned from a period of holiday, some of which had been spent in Brazil. He was due to work the early shift on 15 December 2016 but mistakenly believed he was due to undertake the late shift. He therefore attended the late shift (which he was late to any way). He also said that he did not want to undertake coaching that had been arranged for him with a consultant, Mr Chapman, as he felt tired. Mr Chapman reported to Mr Williams that Mr Cupid had turned up late for the coaching and that he had had a negative attitude to the training.

On 19 December 2016 Mr Williams decided, in conjunction with Ms Prentice, to dismiss Mr Cupid for the reason that he felt he had a poor attitude, that this would not change, and that a dismissal procedure was therefore not necessary – Mr Williams asked Ms Prentice’s opinion on whether Mr Cupid should be dismissed and she stated that she thought he should be.

The Employment Tribunal’s decision

The Employment Tribunal held that Mr Cupid had been subjected to direct race discrimination in the decision to dismiss him – it held that, prior to the complaint of discrimination by Mr Cupid, Mr Cupid was seen as ‘calm’ and as a productive employee, whereas after 20 October 2016 Ms Prentice viewed him as being “aggressive”. The Tribunal found that the reason for Ms Prentice’s change in attitude was the complaint of discrimination that Mr Cupid had made – this was why she felt “scared” of Mr Cupid and why she considered him to be “aggressive”. The Tribunal found that, but for the complaint of discrimination, he would not have been dismissed, and that the real reason for the dismissal was therefore the complaint of discrimination.

The Tribunal also held that the comment that Mr Cupid was being “childish” also constituted direct race discrimination – the reason for this comment was because he had made a complaint of race discrimination.

The Employment Tribunal awarded Mr Cupid over £55,000 as compensation, comprised of £15,000 for injury to feelings, interest, past loss of earnings of £16,275.06, future loss of earnings of £11,270.70, and an ACAS uplift of £6,548.40. The Tribunal also ‘grossed up’ by 20% to account for tax.

Our solicitors’ comments

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that employers should be extremely careful in deciding whether to dismiss employees without any form of procedure and, further, as to who should oversee any dismissal process and make the decision to dismiss. In this case the Tribunal found that the reason for dismissal was inextricably bound up with, and therefore tainted by, the complaint of discrimination that Mr Cupid had made.”

The Employment Tribunal’s decision can be found here.


Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees

Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk.

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk


4.52 Average

21 Reviews

Redman's provided excellent legal employment advice for me during a difficult time in my employment. Chris was my lawyer, super efficient, quick, reliable and clearly very experienced in the matter. Could not ask for a better law firm to deal with your query if you are in need of some help. Would definitely use them again in the future. Highly recommending Chris.

Posted 3 weeks ago


Chris Hadrill was very professional and responsive. I would highly recommend him

Posted 4 weeks ago


Very Efficient, with very quick email reply’s. I had a matter that needed resolving within a very short space of time and Redmans Solicitors were great with dealing with my matter quickly.

Posted 4 weeks ago


At Redmans the solicitor that was dealing with me was Chris. He dealt with my situation smoothly with clear guidance and explanation

Posted 1 month ago


Clear, concise advice and guidance delivered by an experienced and very capable solicitor, within the timelines required

Posted 1 month ago


Very efficient service. I never had to wIt for more than a day for a reply to any of my queries and the matter was dealt with swiftly.

Posted 1 month ago


Very timely, thorough and helpful advice. Friendly and considerate of the needs of the client

Posted 1 month ago


Very prompt and attention to detail. Thank you for the service

Posted 1 month ago


Couldn’t be happier with how Redmans successfully handled our seemingly tricky case. By being clear and detailed every step of the way, with the utmost professionalism and courtesy, they made it an informative and eye-opening process, taking the stress out of the situation and ultimately delivered what you would want from such a service. I fully appreciate everything they have done, and if I am ever in need of such services in the future, they will be the first number I contact. Excellent.

Posted 1 month ago


Excellent work delivered with great quality

Posted 1 month ago


Chris Hadrill was a great help both in terms of his advice and his expertise. He explained my options to me clearly and concisely enabling me to quickly make the right decision for me in the circumstance. I would not hesitate to recommend Chris or Redmans to friends or colleagues, and would certainly make Redmans my first port of call should I require a similar service in the future.

Posted 1 month ago


Redmans gave excellent advice and helped me understand everything in clear concepts. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago


Resolved my issues

Posted 1 month ago


Quick fast professional service.

Posted 1 month ago


"Prompt, efficient and practical advice that resulted in me getting some additional money tax free."

Posted 1 month ago


Patient and thorough advice given to me around my Settlement Agreement

Posted 2 months ago


"Excellent service, getting back to you promptly giving you very good advice."

Posted 2 months ago


I found Chris Hadrill to be an excellent help, he is very knowledgeable and gives good ,concise ,strategic advice .He makes himself readily accessible when you need him.I would personally highly recommend him.

Posted 2 months ago


Professional, efficient and reliable service provided. I strongly recommend them and I would use this service again.

Posted 2 months ago