Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The case of Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Tayeh concerns unfair dismissal – specifically whether it was reasonable for the Respondent to dismiss the Claimant

The facts in Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Tayeh

Mrs Tayeh (“the Claimant”) commenced employment with Magnolia Court Care Home (“the Care Home”) in 1996 as a registered nurse. Barchester Healthcare Ltd (“the Respondent”) subsequently took over the Care Home and the Claimant’s contract of employment was transferred to the Respondent. In December 2009 two managers of the Respondent visited the Care Home unannounced and found several shortcomings in how the Care Home was run. A number of these shortcomings concerned the area of the Care Home of which the Claimant was in charge. A series of investigatory meetings followed. However, on 10 February 2010 another incident occurred when a resident of the Care Home fell and suffered a fractured hip. The Respondent was unhappy that the Claimant hadn’t visited the resident for 3 hours when her shift began and that the Claimant hadn’t filled in the necessary paperwork. The Claimant was disciplined and dismissed  on 11 March 2010 after a disciplinary hearing on 4 March 2010. The Claimant subsequently submitted a claim for unfair dismissal.

The Employment Tribunal found in the Claimant’s favour in her unfair dismissal claim. The Respondent appealed on a number of grounds, one of which being that the Employment Tribunal had substituted its own view on fairness for that of the employer. The Claimant also cross-appealed on issues relating to remedy – she had been held to be at fault for her dismissal (50% contributory fault) and her compensation was further reduced by 12.5% for Polkey reasons.

The law relating to unfair dismissal (particularly substantive unfair dismissal)

An employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed under s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. There are two (crude) “branches” of unfair dismissal – substantive unfair dismissal and procedural unfair dismissal. A dismissal will be substantively unfair if it falls outside of the range of reasonable responses in the circumstances. A dismissal will be procedurally unfair if, for example, the Respondent fails to carry out a disciplinary procedure, fails to consider necessary evidence, or treats the Claimant inconsistently (among others).

In order for a dismissal to be substantively fair the following must have occurred:

  1. A reasonably thorough investigation must have been carried out into the allegations
  2. The Respondent must have a reasonable belief in the Claimant’s “guilt” based on these investigations
  3. The Respondent must have an honest belief in the Claimant’s “guilt”

Should these three elements be demonstrated the Respondent will have a strong chance of successfully defending the Employment Tribunal proceedings.

An important point relating to substantive unfair dismissal is that the Employment Tribunal must look at the employer’s subjective state of mind at the time of the decision to dismiss. The Employment Tribunal must not substitute its view on the objective fairness of the dismissal but must consider what the employer believed on the balance of probabilities.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Tayeh

The Employment Appeal Tribunal upheld the Respondent’s appeal and substituted in its place a finding of fair dismissal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal came to the conclusion that the Employment Tribunal had substituted its view on fairness instead of starting with the employer’s reasoning and applying the range of responses test.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on Barchester Healthcare Ltd v Tayeh

This is an interesting case concerning unfair dismissal under employment law. The most important piece of information that can be gleaned from this judgment is that Employment Tribunals cannot consider the justice of the dismissal itself, it can only consider what the employer’s reasons for dismissing the employee were and whether the dismissal fell within the reasonable range of responses in the circumstances.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.68 Average

69 Reviews

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 2 days ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago