Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Today we’re going to examine the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal decision in Bancroft v Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd, a case concerning a “Some Other Substantial Reason” dismissal (“SOSR”). In doing so, we’ll examine the following four elements:

  1. What were the facts in Bancroft v Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd?
  2. What is the relevant law relating to unfair dismissal and this case?
  3. Why did the Employment Appeal Tribunal reach this decision?
  4. Why is this case significant?

What were the facts in Bancroft v Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd?

Mr Bancroft (‘the Claimant’) is a chef. From 20 July 2004 he worked at Wordsworth House, a bail hostel. On 30 June 2008, he became an employee of Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd (‘the Respondent’) to provide catering services to the bail hostel under a contract with the Home Office (‘the third party’). In September 2010, the third party requested the removal of the Claimant after receiving recommendations to do so from the Claimant’s manager. On 21 December 2010, the Claimant was suspended following a disciplinary hearing that arose from a complaint made against the Claimant by another member of staff, despite receiving a first and final warning. The Claimant turned down the Respondent’s offer of a lower paid alternative job 30 miles further away and was dismissed on 16 March 2011. The Employment Tribunal found the third party’s pressure on the Respondent to remove the Claimant satisfied ‘some other substantial reason’ to dismiss the Claimant. The Employment Tribunal also found the Respondent did everything it could reasonably do to mitigate the injustice brought about by this pressure. The Claimant appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal against this point.

What is the relevant law relating to unfair dismissal and this case?

Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 s 94(1) an employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The employer must show under s 98(1)(b) ‘some other substantial reason’ for the dismissal and under s 98(4) whether or not the dismissal is fair depends on:

  1. whether the employer acted reasonably in treating it as a sufficient reason for dismissing the employee, and
  2. shall be determined in accordance with equity and the substantial merits of the case.

Why did the Employment Appeal Tribunal reach this decision?

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal and remitted the claim back to the Employment Tribunal. The judgment referred to Henderson v Connect South Tyneside Ltd [2010] IRLR 468 where it held employers must do all they reasonably can to mitigate the injustice brought about by third parties by trying to get the client to change their mind and then trying to find alternative work. The Employment Appeal Tribunal found that the Employment Tribunal failed to make all the necessary findings of fact on the issue of whether the Respondent had taken all steps to mitigate the injustice caused by the Claimant’s removal at the third party’s request. Firstly, the grievances raised by another member of staff arising in disciplinary procedures in December were deemed trivial by the Employment Tribunal. Secondly, the Employment Tribunal did not address why the Respondent had not asked the manager to explain his motives for removing the Claimant. Thirdly, difficulties between the manager and the Claimant were not considered between the third party’s request to remove the Claimant in September 2010 and his dismissal in March 2011.

Why is this case significant?

This case is significant because third parties can potentially give rise to a fair dismissal for ‘some other substantial reason’. This means there may be a need for contractual arrangements to govern the rights of a third party to request dismissals. However, employers may not agree with the request and third parties may have ulterior motives for wanting employees dismissed. This raises questions of fairness and injustice if customers dictate to employers who to dismiss without trial or opportunity for employees to represent themselves. Indeed, this case demonstrates instances where the employee suffered an injustice without considering more facts. Subsequently, this case shows employers need to attempt to get third parties to change their mind and find an alternative job for the employee if this fails. The best advice for employers is to address potential issues between clients and employees before they fully develop. This is also good for maintaining client and employee relationships.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.70 Average

73 Reviews

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 3 days ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Nicola W

Fantastic service, very quick and efficient. Thank you

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 1 month ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 1 month ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 1 month ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 2 months ago