Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust ET/2401985/2017 the Employment Tribunal held that giving a 4-day time period for the acceptance of a settlement agreement offer did not constitute ‘improper behaviour’.

The facts in Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust

Mrs Lingard commenced employment with Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust (“the Trust”) on 1 January 2002, and she was at the times relevant to this case employed as Head Teacher; the Trust is a group of four primary schools in Wigan.

In April 2016 Jonathan Brown was commissioned to undertake an external review of the school; at the end of this review Mr Brown fed back that the school was at the level “requires improvement”.

From 7 November 2016 Mrs Lingard was absent from work with high blood pressure and stress. On 15 November 2016 she undertook an occupational health assessment by telephone, and on 17 November 2016 she was invited to attend a welfare meeting on 30 November 2016.

Mrs Lingard attended the meeting on 30 November 2016 with her trade union representative, Mr Atkins. After this meeting an offer of settlement was made on a “without prejudice” basis by the Trust (via Mr Atkins) of £19,270 (subject to the completion of a settlement agreement); the reason that the offer of settlement was made was that it was not believed that Mrs Lingard would accept responsibility for the poor performance issues that had been raised. On 2 December 2017 Mrs Lingard wrote to Mr Atkins to complain about the without prejudice offer, to assert that she reserved her right to bring certain employment-related claims in the circumstances, and to seek clarification of how the state of affairs had arisen.

On 8 December 2016 Mr Atkins sent Mrs Lingard a further email confirming that a second without prejudice offer had been made of £30,000. Mrs Lingard subsequently dis-instructed Mr Atkins and instructed a law firm to deal with the matter. The offer of £30,000 was subsequently rejected.

Mrs Lingard subsequently resigned from her employment and brought claims in the Employment Tribunal. She relied in her claim form on  incidents which had occurred since 30 November 2016; the Trust objected to this, arguing that the incidents since 30 November 2016 should be covered by ‘without prejudice’ protection and was also a ‘protected conversation’ (for the purposes of section 111A Employment Rights Act 1996).

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

This article explains the law relating to the without prejudice rule.

The Employment Tribunal held that the following incidents were covered by the without prejudice rule as they related to attempts to settle an existing dispute (and therefore inadmissible for the purposes of the Employment Tribunal claim):

  • The rejection of the offers of £19,720 and £30,000
  • Correspondence between Mrs Lingard’s solicitor and the Trust’s solicitors

The Employment Tribunal held, further, that the meeting between Mrs Brown and Mr Atkins on 30 November 2016 to discuss the settlement offer of £19,720 was admissible as it constituted “improper behaviour” (and was therefore not covered by the ‘protected conversation’ rule); the further offer of settlement made on 8 December 2016 was covered by the ‘protected conversation’ rule as the 4-day time period given for the acceptance of the offer was not unreasonable (even if the ACAS Code on settlement agreements recommended that, as a general rule, ten calendar days should be given to consider the offer).

Our solicitors’ view on Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust

Chris Hadrill, partner in the employment department at Redmans, commented on the case: “When negotiating settlement agreements it is important to ensure that any offers made are marked ‘without prejudice’ and ‘subject to contract’ – a failure to do so can have potentially important repercussions if an Employment Tribunal claim is subsequently brought.”

The judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.67 Average

66 Reviews

Anonymous

As with All solicitors advice without consequence but understood and communicated my legal position

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Prompt, professional and excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Dominic C

Excellent service, prompt and helpful

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

I found Redman’s to be very efficient and got me the best deal available in the short time scale that was available.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Victor L

Very professional. Provided excellent advice on my Settlement agreement.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Professional from start to finish.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Oliver W

Excellent service provided by Redmans, will certainly consider using again.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Melanie H

Very professional and extremely personable service. Thank you very much.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I found Chris to be very approachable and easy to speak with about complex matters. He took action quickly and his updates to me, as his client, were prompt. I would recommend Chris and the team at Redmans without hesitation.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Overall happy with the service provided by Chris and Rana.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Rana provide a great service, very informed, diligent and care about your result, would recommend Redmans

Posted 4 weeks ago

David W

A speedy efficient friendly service, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors for processing Settlement Agreements.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Both Rana and Chris were fantastic. From the first phone call I was confident my matter was in good hands. I was not disappointed. I would highly recommend Redmans. Thank you again for all of your support and advice.

Posted 1 month ago

Federico S

Great advices and communication. Through Redmana I obtained match more than what I thought. Highly recommended

Posted 1 month ago

Tom G

A good and efficient service with the required legal advice provided for a settlement agreement.

Posted 1 month ago

Francis T

The solicitor I used was Chris Hadrill, who I found extremely professional and I felt that he made me feel at ease, considering the subject matter he was assisting me with.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris provided excellent assistance with the negotiation of my settlement agreement. From start to finish, I was consitently updated and advised on the best course of action to take. I would highly recommend Chris and Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

They are busy people but manage well so generally I would recommend them.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very efficient and professional service from my first phone call making an enquiry. Timescales of the matter in hand were met and within the agreed budget. Would highly recommend Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Lisa B

Really very good service, always available to answer questions, provide my with any information I needed to make informed decisions.

Posted 1 month ago