Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust ET/2401985/2017 the Employment Tribunal held that giving a 4-day time period for the acceptance of a settlement agreement offer did not constitute ‘improper behaviour’.

The facts in Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust

Mrs Lingard commenced employment with Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust (“the Trust”) on 1 January 2002, and she was at the times relevant to this case employed as Head Teacher; the Trust is a group of four primary schools in Wigan.

In April 2016 Jonathan Brown was commissioned to undertake an external review of the school; at the end of this review Mr Brown fed back that the school was at the level “requires improvement”.

From 7 November 2016 Mrs Lingard was absent from work with high blood pressure and stress. On 15 November 2016 she undertook an occupational health assessment by telephone, and on 17 November 2016 she was invited to attend a welfare meeting on 30 November 2016.

Mrs Lingard attended the meeting on 30 November 2016 with her trade union representative, Mr Atkins. After this meeting an offer of settlement was made on a “without prejudice” basis by the Trust (via Mr Atkins) of £19,270 (subject to the completion of a settlement agreement); the reason that the offer of settlement was made was that it was not believed that Mrs Lingard would accept responsibility for the poor performance issues that had been raised. On 2 December 2017 Mrs Lingard wrote to Mr Atkins to complain about the without prejudice offer, to assert that she reserved her right to bring certain employment-related claims in the circumstances, and to seek clarification of how the state of affairs had arisen.

On 8 December 2016 Mr Atkins sent Mrs Lingard a further email confirming that a second without prejudice offer had been made of £30,000. Mrs Lingard subsequently dis-instructed Mr Atkins and instructed a law firm to deal with the matter. The offer of £30,000 was subsequently rejected.

Mrs Lingard subsequently resigned from her employment and brought claims in the Employment Tribunal. She relied in her claim form on  incidents which had occurred since 30 November 2016; the Trust objected to this, arguing that the incidents since 30 November 2016 should be covered by ‘without prejudice’ protection and was also a ‘protected conversation’ (for the purposes of section 111A Employment Rights Act 1996).

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

This article explains the law relating to the without prejudice rule.

The Employment Tribunal held that the following incidents were covered by the without prejudice rule as they related to attempts to settle an existing dispute (and therefore inadmissible for the purposes of the Employment Tribunal claim):

  • The rejection of the offers of £19,720 and £30,000
  • Correspondence between Mrs Lingard’s solicitor and the Trust’s solicitors

The Employment Tribunal held, further, that the meeting between Mrs Brown and Mr Atkins on 30 November 2016 to discuss the settlement offer of £19,720 was admissible as it constituted “improper behaviour” (and was therefore not covered by the ‘protected conversation’ rule); the further offer of settlement made on 8 December 2016 was covered by the ‘protected conversation’ rule as the 4-day time period given for the acceptance of the offer was not unreasonable (even if the ACAS Code on settlement agreements recommended that, as a general rule, ten calendar days should be given to consider the offer).

Our solicitors’ view on Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust

Chris Hadrill, partner in the employment department at Redmans, commented on the case: “When negotiating settlement agreements it is important to ensure that any offers made are marked ‘without prejudice’ and ‘subject to contract’ – a failure to do so can have potentially important repercussions if an Employment Tribunal claim is subsequently brought.”

The judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs D Lingard v Leading Learners Multi Academy Trust can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.72 Average

89 Reviews

Anonymous

I requested Redmans services on a redundancy case. Both Chris and Rana were great, thoughtful, very professional and responded quickly. They were very clear throughout the entire process, regarding the process and my options and I couldn't feel I had better legal advice for my case. Overall excellent service and I would certainly recommend and use their services again.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

Responsive, patient, thorough and personable - an excellent service.

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

The team at Redmans, Chris Hadrill and Sacha Barrett were always very helpful and had expert knowledge to assist me during my employment law matter, I would not hesitate to recommend them to all!

Posted 5 days ago

Arun T

Chris was punctual, attentive and accurate. He answered my questions with clarity and avoided dubiosity. I would recommend him to anyone seeking legal advice within his remit.

Posted 6 days ago

Yulian Z

Great service

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent, professional service and a speedy resolution. Many thanks

Posted 6 days ago

Taral P

Sacha and Chris were both very helpful in closing out my matter. Sacha was very clear in helping me understanding the documents I needed reviewing, providing a professional service throughout.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Really pleased with the swift and professional service from Redmans. They provided very clear advice and helped conclude my matter with the minimum of stress or delay.

Posted 6 days ago

Matthew L

Redmans were very quick to respond to my initial enquiry, and provided me with a very effective and efficient service, generating a most satisfactory outcome. I would definitely use them again if the need arose.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

First rate service. Warm and friendly whilst exceptionally efficient at the same time. I would highly recommend them.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Professional and helpful. Thorough and supportive.

Posted 1 week ago

Richard A

Excellent service, prompt replies, great advice

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very professional services

Posted 1 week ago

Margaret

Redmans Solicitors took a lot of the worry away and were very thoughtful and meticulous in their dealings with my case , thank you very mush , great service and a great job

Posted 1 month ago

Mark B

Prompt efficient service. Hourly, and part thereof, billing got a bit stressful at times - as opposed to flat fee - made me think twice about sending an email or making a quick call when I had a query because it would have eaten up minutes from my budget. But happy with the legal service I received overall and would recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill has provided a truly wonderful service and was willing to lend his support and expertise at a time when other solicitors, only wanted to discuss their fees! A clear thinking and down to earth professional, Chris can be trusted to listen carefully to your matter, cut through the fog, and advise you on the best (and most realistic) way forward, saving you time, money and heartache. It will be helpful if you first get your ducks in a row in terms of documents / evidence etc. and then contact Chris, (that’s what we did) as this will help your matter to be dealt with faster. The more organised and together you are the more successful you will be. You'll be fine with Chris, I highly recommend him. Good luck!

Posted 1 month ago

Richard v

Excellent Service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very happy from service received. Highly recommend

Posted 1 month ago

Colin W

Very professional and thorough. Sachs who dealt with the bulk of my case was excellent Thank you. .

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was generally impressed with the fast turn around, efficiency, responsiveness, and consideration of circumstances. I needed a couple of areas of advice quickly and with Redmans help was able to get to a conclusion quickly and with minimum stress. They were friendly and professional throughout - I'd use them again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The guidance and assistance I recently received when using Redman's was fantastic. Caroline & Chris were both very informative and understanding walking me through each step. Thank you.

Posted 2 months ago