Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This post will take a look at what the legal situation is when an employee, in the course of their employment, creates a work which may be subject to copyright. The principal question is “who owns the copyright” but we’ll also take a look at what defines a copyrighted work, and what types of copyrighted work there can be. We’ll also take a look at a worked example to highlight commonplace issues that arise in this context.

What is copyright?

Copyright is a property right, which is protected in the UK by virtue of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (“CDPA 1988”) (Flint, Fitzpatrick & Thorne, 2006). It is not a right in novelty of ideas but is based on the right of an author, artist or composer to prevent another person copying an original work. Copyright therefore applies to expressions and not to ideas, procedures, methods of operation or mathematic concepts.

What types of copyright are there?

Copyright only subsists in material that falls within the following categories:

  1. Literary works
  2. Dramatic works
  3. Musical works
  4. Artistic works
  5. Sound recordings
  6. Films
  7. Broadcasts
  8. The typographical arrangement of publications

Literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works (“LDMA” works) must meet the criteria specified below to be subject to copyright.

What defines an LDMA copyrighted work?

To attract the protection of copyright, a work must be:

  • Original
  • Created by (at least) a minimum of effort
  • Recorded

To be original, an author must have applied his own skill, judgment and individual effort to the work.

The “minimum threshold of effort” test is meant to prevent the wholesale copying of copyrighted works – authors of new works must apply at least a minimum amount of effort to the works they have produced to entitle these works to receive copyright protection. The threshold applied to literary works is particularly low.

Under s.3(2) CPDA 1988 the work must be recorded to attract copyright protection, unless it is an artistic work (although some degree of performance is required in this instance). It cannot simply subsist in an idea.

What happens if I create something at work? Who owns the work?

If an employee creates a work in the course of their employment then the first thing they should do is look at their contract of employment to determine whether there is an express agreement as to what happens in these circumstances. If there is no express agreement (in the contract of employment or otherwise) then under s.11(2) CPDA 1988 there is an implied term in the contract that the employer is the owner. This therefore means that the employer would be entitled to ownership of any and all creations of the employee.

However, if a worker or employee has been commissioned to create a work then the author has ownership rights to the work unless there is an agreement that the work is licensed or assigned to the person commissioning the work.

Worked example

Alan is employed by a large company (“Big Film Group”) that deals with film recording and distribution. He has an idea for a mobile phone “app” which is related to film at work and spends some time working on the idea. He doesn’t tell his line manager about the work because he wants to keep the project relatively secret until he’s finalised his project. After a couple of weeks Alan has a prototype app ready and is thinking about engaging the services of an application developer to help him put the “app” idea on the market. However, Alan mistakenly copies his manager (Ben) into an email to the application developer. Ben is unhappy that he hasn’t been informed about this idea and is concerned that Alan has been working on the idea whilst at work. Ben further believes that Big Film Group owns the copyright in the work, not Ben.

There is no express agreement in Alan’s contract as to the ownership status of works created in the course of employment. Alan works in film and has created the work in the course of his employment and it is therefore arguable that the implied term under s.11(2) CPDA 1988 applies – Big Film Group would therefore probably be the owner of the copyright.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.78 Average

143 Reviews

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 6 days ago

Anonymous

Extremely efficient. Mel made a difficult situation bearable and gave good clear guidance thoughout.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Thanks Chris and Sacha I was reassured throughout the process and a happy outcome

Posted 1 week ago

Edward F

Good and clear employment advice

Posted 1 week ago

Richard O

Chris at Redmans is my go-to legal expert when it comes to employee-related matters. His depth of knowledge, experience and considered approach to problems and their solutions is highly valuable. I cannot recommend Redmans highly enough.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Rory Y

They provide me with timely and clear advice!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Steven C

Redmans handled my settlement with my employer quickly, decisively and to a standard that I was very happy with. I would in similar circumstances contract them again

Posted 3 weeks ago

Deepthi K

Transparent. Clear communication. Prompt reply’s. Saves lot of time. Very satisfied.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Sacha did a fantastic job and negotiated a significant better settlement agreement

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dino D

I did get a very swift and god service from Redmans

Posted 3 weeks ago

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 1 month ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 9 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 11 months ago