Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In this post we’ll take a look at:
  1. What is constructive dismissal?
  2. What constitutes a breach of contract by your employer?
  3. Can a breach of contract be a series of cumulative actions or does it have to be a single incident?

1. What is constructive dismissal?

Constructive dismissal is, contrary to the relatively straightforward test for unfair dismissal, a curious mix of common law and statute. A “constructive dismissal” occurs when an employee resigns from their job because of their employer’s unreasonable conduct; effectively “turning” the resignation into a dismissal and enabling them to claim unfair (constructive) dismissal.

2. What constitutes a breach of contract by your employer?

Under s.95(1)(c) an employee may resign from their employment with or without notice but they must be entitled to do so as a result of their employer’s conduct. In determining whether an employee is entitled to resign one or other of two tests are commonly used:

  1. The traditional “contract” test; or
  2. The breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence test

The traditional contract test analyses the express terms of the contract of employment to determine what the contractual terms are and establish whether the employer is guilt of conduct which is a significant (or serious) breach of those terms. It is normally fairly easy to determine what the terms of the contract are if there exists a written contract of employment – what is more difficult is to determine whether the breach of a particular term (say, working hours) is sufficiently serious as to act as a repudiatory breach of the contract of employment by the employer and entitle an employee to resign. The mutual trust and confidence test relies on an examination of whether the actions of the employer are sufficiently serious as to destroy the mutual trust and confidence that previously existed between the parties.

The important element in both of these tests is therefore the meaning of what is sufficiently “serious” to justify an employee’s resignation. Both objective and subjective tests are used to determine whether certain actions (or a failure to take particular actions) are serious. A subjective test involves a look at how important the employee finds a particular action (let’s use the change of working hours again). If the employee thinks this is an extremely important term then it will be subjectively sufficiently serious to entitle the employee to resign. However, the objective seriousness of the action must also be considered – effectively whether the reasonable person would consider the change of working hours a sufficiently serious breach of contract to entitle the employee to resign.

We’ll now go on to take a look at whether a series of actions can cumulatively constitute a sufficiently serious breach of contract to entitle the employee to resign (for example, a series of unjustified disciplinaries over a number of years) or whether there normally has to be a single sufficiently serious action (such as the refusal to pay your wages).

3. Can a breach of contract be a series of cumulative actions or does it have to be a single incident?

An employer’s actions, as above, must be sufficiently serious to be significant and go “to the root of the contract”. The action can either be a single incident or the “last straw” in a series of incidents that had occurred. It will normally be fairly clear whether a single incident justifies an employee’s resignation. The effect of a series of incidents is, however, more unclear and we’ll take a look at this below.

In order for an incident to constitute the “last straw” in a series of incidents and entitle the employee to resign the quality of the incidents as a whole must demonstrate that the employer had indicated an intention to no longer be bound by the terms of the contract of employment. The final incident cannot be utterly trivial or entirely innocuous in nature. If an act is more than trivial, however, it can entitle the employee to resign and the employee can use previous actions by the employer (i.e. disciplinary actions which would otherwise be out of time) as evidence of sufficiently serious behaviour to constitute repudiatory breach of contract. These acts, though, must be of sufficiently serious quality in themselves to be potential breaches of contract – i.e. they can’t be trivial.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Tagged with →  

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 3 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 4 weeks ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 4 weeks ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago