Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case covers two main areas of law: firstly, the law relating to partnerships and, secondly, the law relating to contractual misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.

The facts in Valencia v Llupar

This case concerned the alleged entering-into of a partnership between Norberto Llupar (“the Claimant”) and Natalia Valencia (“the Defendant”) relating to a restaurant business started by the Defendant in London (and possibly a second restaurant). The Defendant allegedly stated to the Claimant that her businesses were doing very well (taking up to £1,000 a day) and that if he invested in the Claimant’s business then he would take a 40% share and be entitled to live above one of the restaurants. The Claimant therefore made four payments totalling £80,000 to the Defendant in May and June 2008.

However, a partnership agreement was never signed by either party and the Claimant later discovered that the Defendant’s business was not doing nearly as well as she stated and that the promised accommodation above the restaurant was not available. The Claimant therefore demanded the return of his money and stated his intention to end their business relationship in August 2008. He issued a claim form almost a year later in September 2009 for various claims of damages for misrepresentation, or for breach of contract (among other claims).

The law relating to partnership and contractual misrepresentation

Partnership

A partnership is a business relationship between two or more parties with a view to profit. A partnership agreement can be written or unwritten, express or implied. There are a number of different types of partnership agreement (including “general partnerships”, “limited liability partnerships” or “LLP’s”, “partnerships at will”, and “limited partnerships”. This post will focus on partnerships at will due to the decision that the Court of Appeal came to.

A partnership at will is a particular type of partnership. It generally applies where there is no written (and signed) partnership agreement and the express terms of the agreement are either not agreed upon or are unclear.

Contractual misrepresentation

Contractual misrepresentation occurs when one party makes an untrue statement of fact or law to another party which induces the other party to enter into a contract, causing the other party loss.

The Court of Appeal’s judgment in Valencia v Llupar

The Defendant appealed the High Court’s judgment on the two following grounds:

  1. That there had been no partnership between the parties; and
  2. That there had been misrepresentations made by the Defendant to the Claimant

The Court of Appeal rejected the Defendant’s appeal. It considered that the High Court judge was entitled to make its finding that there had been not been a partnership between the parties and that the Defendant had made representations of fact (which were untrue) to the Claimant. The fact that neither of the parties had signed the partnership agreement and that the parties had clearly not intended to enter into the agreement until agreement were reached on the terms were critical. Further, in coming to this decision the Court of Appeal relied heavily on the High Court’s assessment of the unreliability of the Defendant’s witness evidence as compared to the Claimant.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.77 Average

132 Reviews

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 1 month ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 9 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 10 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 11 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 11 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 11 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 11 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 11 months ago