Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr S Mohammad v Tesco Stores Limited (ET/1303590/2018) the Employment Tribunal held that the failure to check why an employee had not attended a rescheduled disciplinary hearing rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair.

The facts in Mr S Mohammed v Tesco Stores Limited

Mr S Mohammed (the ‘Claimant’) was employed by Tesco Stores Ltd (the ‘Respondent’) as a warehouse team member (a forklift truck driver) at the Respondent’s warehouse in Daventry.

On 20 December 2017 a female colleague made a complaint that she had been sexually harassed by the Claimant a couple of hours earlier. She alleged that the Claimant had followed her in his truck and made a sexual gesture with his tongue and that he had a history of pursuing her. For example, she alleged that over the last couple of years he had been calling her “sexy” on Facebook and asking people if he could be her boyfriend. She also stated in her complaint that she had asked him to stop but that he had not done so.

The Claimant was called into a meeting following the complaint and asked if he knew the woman in question; he was shown a photo but denied knowing her.  In the following investigation Facebook messages that were purportedly from the Claimant were produced to the Respondent by the female colleague who had made the complaint.

A further investigation meeting took place in February 2018 where the issue of the Facebook messages and account were discussed, along with the allegations of inappropriate comments he had made. The allegations against the Claimant were considered as possible gross misconduct and it was stated that the matter would be referred to a disciplinary hearing.   The Claimant was subsequently suspended on full pay.

The Claimant was, in a letter dated 11 January 2018, invited to a disciplinary hearing and informed the disciplinary allegations were likely to be considered as potential gross misconduct.

The Claimant was signed off work unfit during this period and the disciplinary hearing was, as a result, rescheduled to 16 February 2018. As a result of the Claimant’s sickness absence the meeting was rescheduled again to 22 March 2018. The Claimant was told that if he didn’t attend this meeting then the meeting would proceed as scheduled and a decision would be made in his absence. This letter letter was sent by Recorded Delivery.

The Claimant did not attend the meeting on 22 March 2018 and so the meeting proceeded in his absence. There was no evidence of any attempts by the Respondent to call the Claimant or to check whether the Recorded Delivery letter had been received.  The Claimant’s union representative attended without the Claimant and the chairman of the hearing decided, after reviewing the evidence, that the allegations were made out. It was further decided that the Claimant’s conduct amounted to gross misconduct.  The Claimant was summarily dismissed on 22 March 2018, and he was notified of such by way of a letter dated 27 March 2018. This letter also informed the Claimant that he had a right to appeal against the dismissal.

The Claimant appealed against the dismissal, and said that he did so by way of He was given a right of appeal. He said he received the dismissal letter on 6 April 2018 and appealed the same day: his only stated ground of appeal was that he had not received notice of the disciplinary hearing that had taken place on 22 March 2018, that no-one had called him, and that he was signed off work sick at the time. He did not, however, appeal against the findings made.

The disciplinary appeal hearing took place on the 27 April 2018 with the Claimant attending.  The meeting was adjourned to check the position with regard to the invite letter and reconvened on 3 May 2018. 

The Respondent confirmed that it didn’t appear that the letter had been delivered but it upheld its decision to dismiss the Claimant based on his failure in challenging the specific allegations.  This decision was confirmed on 3 May 2018 by letter of the same date. The Claimant was offered a further right of appeal but did not exercise this right.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed based on the mishandling of the disciplinary process: the failure to check whether the Claimant had received the notice of the disciplinary hearing (of 22 March 2018) or to call him to check why he had not attended was unfair.

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mr S Mohammed v Tesco Stores Limited

Mel Chin, a Legal Executive at Redmans, commented on the case: “The failure of the employer to follow its own internal disciplinary procedures correctly resulted in a procedurally-unfair dismissal – this is another lesson for employers that they must exhaust all internal disciplinary proceedings fully before reaching a decision to dismiss an employee.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr S Mohammad v Tesco Stores Limited (ET/1303590/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

195 Reviews

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 5 days ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Posted 1 month ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 2 months ago