Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr S Mohammad v Tesco Stores Limited (ET/1303590/2018) the Employment Tribunal held that the failure to check why an employee had not attended a rescheduled disciplinary hearing rendered the dismissal procedurally unfair.

The facts in Mr S Mohammed v Tesco Stores Limited

Mr S Mohammed (the ‘Claimant’) was employed by Tesco Stores Ltd (the ‘Respondent’) as a warehouse team member (a forklift truck driver) at the Respondent’s warehouse in Daventry.

On 20 December 2017 a female colleague made a complaint that she had been sexually harassed by the Claimant a couple of hours earlier. She alleged that the Claimant had followed her in his truck and made a sexual gesture with his tongue and that he had a history of pursuing her. For example, she alleged that over the last couple of years he had been calling her “sexy” on Facebook and asking people if he could be her boyfriend. She also stated in her complaint that she had asked him to stop but that he had not done so.

The Claimant was called into a meeting following the complaint and asked if he knew the woman in question; he was shown a photo but denied knowing her.  In the following investigation Facebook messages that were purportedly from the Claimant were produced to the Respondent by the female colleague who had made the complaint.

A further investigation meeting took place in February 2018 where the issue of the Facebook messages and account were discussed, along with the allegations of inappropriate comments he had made. The allegations against the Claimant were considered as possible gross misconduct and it was stated that the matter would be referred to a disciplinary hearing.   The Claimant was subsequently suspended on full pay.

The Claimant was, in a letter dated 11 January 2018, invited to a disciplinary hearing and informed the disciplinary allegations were likely to be considered as potential gross misconduct.

The Claimant was signed off work unfit during this period and the disciplinary hearing was, as a result, rescheduled to 16 February 2018. As a result of the Claimant’s sickness absence the meeting was rescheduled again to 22 March 2018. The Claimant was told that if he didn’t attend this meeting then the meeting would proceed as scheduled and a decision would be made in his absence. This letter letter was sent by Recorded Delivery.

The Claimant did not attend the meeting on 22 March 2018 and so the meeting proceeded in his absence. There was no evidence of any attempts by the Respondent to call the Claimant or to check whether the Recorded Delivery letter had been received.  The Claimant’s union representative attended without the Claimant and the chairman of the hearing decided, after reviewing the evidence, that the allegations were made out. It was further decided that the Claimant’s conduct amounted to gross misconduct.  The Claimant was summarily dismissed on 22 March 2018, and he was notified of such by way of a letter dated 27 March 2018. This letter also informed the Claimant that he had a right to appeal against the dismissal.

The Claimant appealed against the dismissal, and said that he did so by way of He was given a right of appeal. He said he received the dismissal letter on 6 April 2018 and appealed the same day: his only stated ground of appeal was that he had not received notice of the disciplinary hearing that had taken place on 22 March 2018, that no-one had called him, and that he was signed off work sick at the time. He did not, however, appeal against the findings made.

The disciplinary appeal hearing took place on the 27 April 2018 with the Claimant attending.  The meeting was adjourned to check the position with regard to the invite letter and reconvened on 3 May 2018. 

The Respondent confirmed that it didn’t appear that the letter had been delivered but it upheld its decision to dismiss the Claimant based on his failure in challenging the specific allegations.  This decision was confirmed on 3 May 2018 by letter of the same date. The Claimant was offered a further right of appeal but did not exercise this right.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed based on the mishandling of the disciplinary process: the failure to check whether the Claimant had received the notice of the disciplinary hearing (of 22 March 2018) or to call him to check why he had not attended was unfair.

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mr S Mohammed v Tesco Stores Limited

Mel Chin, a Legal Executive at Redmans, commented on the case: “The failure of the employer to follow its own internal disciplinary procedures correctly resulted in a procedurally-unfair dismissal – this is another lesson for employers that they must exhaust all internal disciplinary proceedings fully before reaching a decision to dismiss an employee.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr S Mohammad v Tesco Stores Limited (ET/1303590/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    320 Reviews

    Anonymous

    Efficient and quick service!

    Posted 1 hour ago

    Karen B

    Quick response very helpful Issue raised dealt with very quickly

    Posted 3 days ago

    Carmen T

    Redmans give Great service and advice on reading contracts. They can explain all the solicitors jargon into words that you can understand. I received excellent service an I will use them again and again.

    Posted 5 days ago

    Anonymous

    Very grateful for Mel’s efforts in handling my case from start to finish which I would have found very stressful without it. She was very professional, friendly and we had a positive outcome. Highly recommend.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Nalin W

    Mel Chin was my Legal Executive when I engaged the services of Redmans Solicitors to help with a redundancy matter. She was incredibly approachable and professional from start to finish. Specially I have to mention regarding prompt reply to all my email queries, It was super quick. I would thoroughly recommend Mel Chin. Many Thanks

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I'd highly recommend Redmans Solicitors. Mel was very helpful and assisted me throughout my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 1 month ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 months ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 2 months ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 2 months ago