Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Sesay v The Whitepost Healthcare Group ET/2304345/2018 the Employment Tribunal awarded costs against a claimant after she refused to withdraw her claim after it had been settled.

The facts in Sesay v The Whitepost Healthcare Group

Mrs Sesay (“the Claimant”) brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal against The Whitepost Healthcare Group (“the Respondent”) for constructive dismissal. She instructed solicitors to represent her.

On 5 February 2019 the Employment Tribunal was notified that the claim had been settled via an ACAS-conciliated COT3 settlement agreement.

On 14 March 2019 the Claimant informed the Employment Tribunal that her solicitors had not had authority to settle the claim on her behalf, and asking for her claim to be reconsidered.

At the preliminary hearing to reconsider the decision of the Employment Tribunal (to dismiss the claim) the Claimant gave evidence that on 5 February 2019 she had received a telephone call from her solicitors early in the morning whilst she was in the USA; this call woke her up and she was informed of the terms of a COT3 settlement agreement that had been sent to her solicitors. At that point the Claimant informed her solicitors that she agreed to the terms offered, but later that day she decided that she did not in fact agree to the terms. She had understood that she could go into her solicitors’ offices when she returned to the UK to sign the agreement.

On 9 February 2019 the Claimant returned to the UK and on 13 February 2019 she emailed her solicitors to confirm that she did not wish to sign the COT3 settlement agreement. At that point she was informed that her solicitors had in fact signed the COT3 settlement agreement on her behalf on 5 February 2019.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant had given authority to her solicitors on 5 February 2019 that she wished to sign the settlement agreement, and that it had only been later that she had changed her mind. The Employment Tribunal therefore held that the Claimant’s solicitors had actual authority to enter into the COT3 settlement agreement on 5 February 2019.

The Employment Tribunal also concluded that the Claimant’s solicitors also had ostensible (or apparent) authority to enter into the settlement agreement: the Claimant had signed a form of authority, the Claimant’s solicitors had been negotiating the terms of the settlement agreement for a lengthy period of time, and it was reasonable for the Respondent to assume that the Claimant’s solicitors had authority to act on the Claimant’s behalf.

The Employment Tribunal rejected the Claimant’s application for reconsideration on the basis that:

  1. ACAS had ‘taken action’ to settle the claim under sections 18A to 18C of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, and that the claim had therefore been validly settled under section 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; and
  2. The Claimant’s solicitors had actual or apparent authority to enter into the COT3 settlement agreement on the Claimant’s behalf

The Employment Tribunal also ordered the Claimant to pay £1,000 towards the Respondent’s costs for the hearing.

Our solicitors’ comments on Sesay v The Whitepost Healthcare Group

Chris Hadrill, partner in the employment department at Redmans, commented on the case: “It is difficult not to have sympathy with the Claimant in this case, but it should serve as a warning to other Employment Tribunal users that you should be careful about informing your solicitors that you agree to the terms of settlement – if you do so then you may be unable to change your mind at a later date.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in the case of Sesay v The Whitepost Healthcare Group ET/2304345/2018 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name

Your last name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 3 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 3 weeks ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 4 weeks ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago