Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Miss N Grant v Hunter Price International Ltd and Others: 2410479/2018 the Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant had been constructively dismissed, discriminated against and victimised after being subjected to intense pressure by employer.

The facts in Grant v Hunter Price International Ltd and Others

Miss Grant (the “Claimant”) commenced employment with Hunter Price International Ltd on 2 January 2014 as a Business Development Manager. The correct Respondents for the purpose of the Hearing were confirmed as Price Hunter International Ltd and the Managing Director, Mr Joshua Eden (the “Respondents). The Claimant was not provided with a contract of employment, job description or a statement of main terms of conditions by. The Respondent is the sister company of Hunter Price International Ltd that is engaged in the design, manufacture and supply of innovative products to retailers and distributors in the UK and abroad.  It also traded in clearance stock but in or around 2012 a decision was made to move the clearance business to a separate company Price Hunter International Limited, the Respondent Company.  

The Claimant worked as part of a small team of four staff. Her role involved making contact with companies across the UK and abroad with a view to purchasing stock and also visiting exhibitions, trade shows and shops to identify stock buying opportunities.  The role also had an element of sales attached to it and the claimant would offer the clearance stock to a small and relatively fixed customer base. In her letter of appointment it stated “The role will include contacting companies for potential purchasing of clearance stock, visiting various exhibitions for stock buying and keeping a database of all potential suppliers”.  The Claimant’s starting salary was £25,000 with commission of 0.5% on purchases.  This increased to a salary of £30,000 plus commission of 1% on sales and 0.75% on purchases.  The Claimant’s role was largely independent, and the Claimant was trusted to get on with her job and set her own tasks and work to her own schedule.

The Respondents were aware the Claimant had her own method of storing contacts such as excel spreadsheets, emails and business cards rather than using the company software package known as “ACT”. The Claimant’s system worked well on a large project (the Aldi contract) she worked on, and the Respondent did not raise any concerns over her working methods, and indeed the Claimant applied for, and was awarded,  a pay rise in recognition of her work of £5,000 plus commission.

The Claimant became under increased pressure in November-December 2017 to produce a master spreadsheet for contacts and the Respondents raised additional concerns about her timekeeping and team working, but no criticism was made about her actual work performance or methods.  There was no indication at this time that any disciplinary action was being considered by the Respondents. The Claimant informed the Respondents of her pregnancy on 14 December 2017.  Pressure increased on the Claimant to produce the list of supplier contents in a master database via a management instruction on 20 December 2017. She was given a 5pm deadline the next day to comply or disciplinary action would be instigated.

The Respondents carried out an investigation meeting in January 2018 to discuss the issue of the Claimant’s failure to produce a master spreadsheet, which they failed to send her an invite and conducted the meeting without her.  Around this time the Claimant’s union representative raised the issue of a risk assessment for the Claimant as part of her job role involved lifting heavy objects and sometimes travelling long distances to attend exhibitions. The risk assessment was not carried out. The disciplinary meeting was held on 19 January 2018 following a letter sent to the Claimant setting out allegations for gross misconduct including, continued refusal to comply with a legitimate and reasonable management instruction, loss of company information and property and breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.  At the disciplinary hearing the Claimant was confronted again with the whereabouts of the master spreadsheet which she again denied one existed but was happy to produce one if that was required.  The Respondents sought to reconvene at a further disciplinary meeting but the Claimant was concerned about the adverse impact this was having on her health generally and the impact the stress and anxiety was having on her unborn child. She submitted her resignation by email on 1 March 2018. The Claimant commenced early conciliation on 9 March 2018.

The Claimant lodged a claim at the Employment Tribunal (ET) raising a number of matters which included amongst other things unfair constructive dismissal, pregnancy discrimination, detriment suffered because of her pregnancy and victimisation based on the Respondent’s failure to pay outstanding commission.  

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The ET held in favour of the Claimant. They found her claims for constructive unfair dismissal were proven in the way the Respondent had handled the investigatory and disciplinary process, and that the conduct of the Respondent as a whole amounted to a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence – the Respondent had embarked on a course of behaviour that was likely to destroy the employment relationship leaving the Claimant little choice but to resign.

The ET found based on the facts, the Respondents had treated the Claimant less favourably because of her pregnancy – the proximity of the management instruction to the announcement of her pregnancy and the unrealistic timeframe that she was given to comply amounted to pregnancy discrimination.

Pregnancy and maternity discrimination

It is unlawful to discriminate against a person because they are pregnant or have taken (or are taking, or intend to take) a period of maternity leave (section 18 Equality Act 2020).

Read our guide on pregnancy discrimination

Finally, the claim for victimisation was also upheld by the Employment Tribunal – the actions of the Respondent in withholding her commission was found to amount to victimisation (see here for a guide to the law on victimisation). 

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Grant v Hunter Price International Ltd and Others

As the Tribunal pointed out the employer in this case embarked on a course of behaviour that involved failure to follow due process and fairness in its treatment of an employee, which was accelerated after being notified by her of her pregnancy.  The actions of the Respondents in withholding the commission that should have been paid along with her salary, was linked by the ET to the Claimant contacting ACAS rather than any contractual term, so were a clear detriment amounting to victimisation.

The liability judgment in the case of Miss N Grant v Hunter Price International Ltd and Others: 2410479/2018 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

195 Reviews

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 5 days ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Posted 1 month ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 2 months ago