Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd [UKEAT/0105/18/BA], Mr Ibrahim lost his appeal at the Employment Appeal Tribunal because there was no ‘public interest’ element to his whistleblowing claim. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal did find that the ‘legal obligations’ referred to in the whistleblowing legislation could include tortious and statutory duties.

The facts in Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd

The Claimant was an interpreter for HCA International Limited (“HCA”) at a private hospital.  In 2016 rumours were circulating amongst patients that the Claimant was responsible for breaches of patient confidentiality.  The Claimant asked for the rumours to be investigated in order for him to clear his name of any wrong-doing. The rumours were investigated and HCA rejected his complaint.  When he was later dismissed, he brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal for suffering a detriment for having made a protected disclosure (also known as ‘whistleblowing’) under s. 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the ‘ERA Act’).

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s whistleblowing claim on two grounds. Firstly, they held that a complaint that false rumours had been spread was not a disclosure of information showing a breach of a legal obligation as required by s.43B(1)(b) of the ERA Act. Secondly, they held that the Claimant’s complaint had not been made ‘in the public interest’ (as required by s.43(B)(1) of the ERA Act).  To satisfy the test contained in s.43(B)(1), an Employment Tribunal has to ask itself whether the worker believed that the disclosure they were making was in the public interest, and whether, if so, that belief was reasonable.  The Employment Tribunal held the Claimant’s disclosure had been made with a view to clearing his name and re-establishing his reputation, not in the public interest. Mr Ibrahim appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT held that the Employment Tribunal had erred in finding that the subject matter of the Claimant’s complaint did not come within s.43B(1)(b) (which refers to a breach of a ‘legal obligation’).  The EAT stated that a breach of a legal obligation could include tortious duties, such as defamation, and breaches of statutory duty, such as those contained in the Defamation Act 2013. The Claimant’s complaint was essentially that he was being defamed and, thus, the Employment Tribunal should have found that S.43B(1)(b) was satisfied.

However, they went on to dismiss the Claimant’s second ground of appeal and instead upheld the Employment Tribunal’s conclusion that the Claimant did not believe his complaint raised a public interest issue for the purpose of S.43(B)(1), and so it was not protected.  This conclusion was based on a finding of fact that the Claimant did not have a subjective belief in the public interest element of his disclosure.  The Claimant’s appeal was therefore dismissed.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “This case demonstrates that the requirement that a disclosure is made ‘in the public interest’ is fundamental to the success of any whistleblowing claim.  Whether a disclosure was made ‘in the public interest’ is for a tribunal to decide having considered the facts of the case, but this case makes it clear that the disclosure must be concerned with more than just a breach of an individual worker’s contract of employment for it to be covered by whistleblowing legislation.” 

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd UKEAT/0105/18/BA can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Contact us

    Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

    T: 020 3397 3603
    E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
    W: www.redmans.co.uk

    Testimonials

    4.76 Average

    235 Reviews

    Paul O

    Chris & Rana guided me through a redundancy discussion. Prompt & patient assistance with the documents & meetings. Clear advice & fast responses regarding negotiations. Would definitely recommend & would use again without hesitation.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Outstanding, efficient service. Thank you so much!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Jaswant S

    Very very happy with the good service I got Thank you so much for your help

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Mel and Chris were fantastic and supportive throughout! 1000% recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Emma D

    Good responsive service

    Posted 1 month ago

    Mike T

    Good efficient service.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Brenda G

    Very professional and helpful

    Posted 1 month ago

    Charles A

    Chris Hadrill was recommended to me when I found myself in need of a solicitor at very short notice. He contacted me almost immediately to arrange a call. Chris handled my case in a professional and timely manner and kept me notified throughout. Chris inspired confidence and made me feel I was being cared for. If ever I'm in need of legal representation, I would not hesitate to contact Chris. And will gladly recommend him to family and friends.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Rosalind R

    I was very happy with the service that I received from Redmans Solicitors. They were able to advise me accordingly with regards to my employment matter and stay within the agreed costing.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Karl B

    Caroline and Chris were so helpful and friendly. Couldn't of asked for a better service.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Dimitrios P

    Excellent, professional service, in time and within the expected value.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Barbara K

    Everything quickly and fairly. Very professional. Thank you.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Sabrina J

    I received a efficient professional service during the whole process of liasing between myself and my former employer to getting all forms signed and receiving my redundancy payment in full in the summer of this year.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I received legal advice on a redundancy settlement agreement from Redmans Solicitors and was very impressed by the quality of their service. Chris Hadrill is highly experienced in settlement matters and was especially understanding of the particulars of my case, going out of his way to ensure that it was resolved quickly and with the utmost professionalism. I have no hesitation in recommending Redmans to anyone in need of employment advice and settlement resolution.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service, with full explanations of everything needed. Both Chris and Mel answered all emails very promptly and were personable and efficient.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I would like to thank Chris Hadrill, in particular who handled my case, for all his hard work, expertise and dedication. He listened with empathy and offered suitable advice, which made me feel valued and confident through a difficult time. I would highly recommend Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. Thank you.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Yann G

    Yann Guezennec / Chris Hadrill - Thanks for the detailed, informed and professional advice for my settlement. When comprise is the rule I felt we could have been maybe a bit more aggressive from the start. However an acceptable outcome considering the situation. Thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Valentina D

    Great service from Mel, she was very good at explaining every part of the settlement agreement and very efficient dealing with the HR team. Very professional team, I would definitely use them again in future if the opportunity came up.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Olaf S

    I was very happy with the service that I have received. Thank You Regards

    Posted 2 months ago

    Rebecca A

    I had a wonderful solicitor called Caroline who was so helpful and gave me all the information I need and explained everything in detail so I was crystal clear. Would highly recommend if you are in need of a solicitor!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Gareth J

    Very efficient, helpful and pragmatic support from Caroline. Happy to work with my requirements / suggestions but also made some very good points which helped to achieve a higher settlement amount. Would highly recommend Caroline and Chris.

    Posted 2 months ago