Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mr Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd [UKEAT/0105/18/BA], Mr Ibrahim lost his appeal at the Employment Appeal Tribunal because there was no ‘public interest’ element to his whistleblowing claim. However, the Employment Appeal Tribunal did find that the ‘legal obligations’ referred to in the whistleblowing legislation could include tortious and statutory duties.

The facts in Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd

The Claimant was an interpreter for HCA International Limited (“HCA”) at a private hospital.  In 2016 rumours were circulating amongst patients that the Claimant was responsible for breaches of patient confidentiality.  The Claimant asked for the rumours to be investigated in order for him to clear his name of any wrong-doing. The rumours were investigated and HCA rejected his complaint.  When he was later dismissed, he brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal for suffering a detriment for having made a protected disclosure (also known as ‘whistleblowing’) under s. 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the ‘ERA Act’).

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s whistleblowing claim on two grounds. Firstly, they held that a complaint that false rumours had been spread was not a disclosure of information showing a breach of a legal obligation as required by s.43B(1)(b) of the ERA Act. Secondly, they held that the Claimant’s complaint had not been made ‘in the public interest’ (as required by s.43(B)(1) of the ERA Act).  To satisfy the test contained in s.43(B)(1), an Employment Tribunal has to ask itself whether the worker believed that the disclosure they were making was in the public interest, and whether, if so, that belief was reasonable.  The Employment Tribunal held the Claimant’s disclosure had been made with a view to clearing his name and re-establishing his reputation, not in the public interest. Mr Ibrahim appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT held that the Employment Tribunal had erred in finding that the subject matter of the Claimant’s complaint did not come within s.43B(1)(b) (which refers to a breach of a ‘legal obligation’).  The EAT stated that a breach of a legal obligation could include tortious duties, such as defamation, and breaches of statutory duty, such as those contained in the Defamation Act 2013. The Claimant’s complaint was essentially that he was being defamed and, thus, the Employment Tribunal should have found that S.43B(1)(b) was satisfied.

However, they went on to dismiss the Claimant’s second ground of appeal and instead upheld the Employment Tribunal’s conclusion that the Claimant did not believe his complaint raised a public interest issue for the purpose of S.43(B)(1), and so it was not protected.  This conclusion was based on a finding of fact that the Claimant did not have a subjective belief in the public interest element of his disclosure.  The Claimant’s appeal was therefore dismissed.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “This case demonstrates that the requirement that a disclosure is made ‘in the public interest’ is fundamental to the success of any whistleblowing claim.  Whether a disclosure was made ‘in the public interest’ is for a tribunal to decide having considered the facts of the case, but this case makes it clear that the disclosure must be concerned with more than just a breach of an individual worker’s contract of employment for it to be covered by whistleblowing legislation.” 

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Ibrahim v HCA International Ltd UKEAT/0105/18/BA can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.81 Average

    314 Reviews

    Anonymous

    I'd highly recommend Redmans Solicitors. Mel was very helpful and assisted me throughout my case.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 6 days ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 1 week ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Melanie M

    Very happy with the detailed advice provided from Redmans. They also helped me to secure a higher settlement than originally offered by my employer and were extremely diligent. I first spoke with Chris at relatively short notice and then Sacha dealt with my case. Would definitely recommend and use again in the future if needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans helped me with a work related issue, which was resolved quickly and professionally. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 month ago

    James F

    Great people, really friendly and professional helped with everything that I needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anusha S

    My case was handled by Sacha who was very thorough and helped me to achieve a good outcome with my employer. Sacha was very personal, professional and helped me during quite a stressful time, so I am hugely grateful to her and to Redmans. This was my first time engaging with a law firm so I wasn't sure what to expect but I can definitely say that it was a good experience overall and I ended up better off due to having the help of an experienced and proactive solicitor on my side.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Diane P

    So grateful that I contacted Redmans to deal with my Redundancy Agreement. Everything from the initial call to the completion of the matter was professional, efficient and effective. I was listened to, had everything explained simply and kept informed of every step. I received super advice and the costs were very competitive. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking similar help. First class service - thank you

    Posted 1 month ago