Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This interesting and timely case decided by the highest court, appears to draw a line under the extent to which a litigant can invoke his/her right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In the case of R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and anor [2018] 1 WLR 4079, the Supreme Court dismissed a work-seeker’s appeal against the inclusion on an enhanced criminal records certificate (ECRC) of the fact that he had been acquitted on a charge of rape. The Court held that a High Court judge had been entitled to find that the ECRC, issued in relation to his applicarion to work as a teacher, did not breach the individual’s right to a private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Indeed, reference to the rape acquittal was reasonable, proportionate and no more than necessary to secure the objective of protecting young and vulnerable persons.

The facts in R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police

R, a qualified teacher, was charged with the rape of a 17-year-old woman while he was working as a taxi driver in 2009. A jury found him not guilty and he was acquitted. He applied for a number of teaching jobs, which required an ECRC under S.113B of the Police Act 1997. The ECRC issued included details of the allegation against him and the fact that he had been acquitted. R appealed under the police complaints procedure. R lost his appeal on the basis that the alleged incident was recent and of a very serious nature, and that the potential risk to vulnerable people outweighed the effect of disclosure, on R’s human rights. R applied to the High Court for judicial review. He argued, among other things, that his right to privacy under Article 8 ECHR had been breached.

The decision of the High Court

The High Court rejected R’s challenge. It accepted that Article 8 was engaged but found that the interference with R’s private life was proportionate under Article 8(2). The disclosure was ‘no more than was necessary to meet the pressing social need for children and vulnerable adults to be protected’.

The decision of the Supreme Court in  R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and anor [2018] 1 WLR 4079

The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal that the inclusion of the information on the ECRC could not be justified unless the officers were in a position to form a positive view of likely guilt, which required them to undertake a detailed analysis of the evidence at the trial. The High Court was entitled to accept the Chief Constable’s view that the information included in the ECRC was ‘not lacking substance’ and that the allegations ‘might be true’. It was relevant that the information about the charge and acquittal was a matter of public record and that it be brought to a potential employer’s attention.

Lord Carnwath, delivering the judgement, did indicate that there was no clear guidance as to what weight should be given to an acquittal in different circumstances, that there existed a lack of information about how an ECRC is to be treated by a potential employer and that an adverse ECRC was likely, as expressed by a police officer in a previous case, to be a ‘killer blow’ for an application to a sensitive post. In Lord Carnwath’s view, ‘careful thought needs to be given to the value in practice of disclosing allegations which have been tested in court and have led to an acquittal’.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police

Caroline Lewis, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “Police forces can now reveal whether individuals have been acquitted of criminal charges when issuing information for enhanced record checks. In principle, in issuing an ECRC, even acquittal by a criminal court following a full trial can be said to imply no more than that the charge has not been proved beyond reasonable doubt. In principle, it leaves open the possibility that the allegation was true and this could have devastating effects for job applicants who have to produce an ECRC”.

The decision of the Supreme Court decision in R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police and anor [2018] UKSC 47 can be found here

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

124 Reviews

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 7 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 9 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 9 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 9 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 9 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 9 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Chris was absolutely excellent. Clear and concise, offering sound advice.

Posted 10 months ago

Tim O

Experienced and competent advisors

Posted 10 months ago

Rachel A

Quick and expert assistance. I would highly recommend Chris for any of your legal needs.

Posted 10 months ago

Joe S

I was very happy with the service provided by Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. I felt very comfortable discussing all matters with Chris and am very grateful for all the help and guidance I was given throughout the whole process. I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to friends and family!

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

I had a very good experience working with Chris Hadrill during a difficult and emotional time. This held true from the moment I spoke to him on the phone, to the end of the process. Overall, he was attentive, professional and highly supportive. He provided sound advice and clarity. It was the reviews that led me to Redmans! I was very happy to know they were all true. I highly recommend working with Redmans Solicitors. Thank-you to the entire team!

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Good service

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service. Highly recommend.

Posted 10 months ago

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 10 months ago