Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

MoJThe director of a law firm (A) and A’s law firm (C) has been ordered by an Employment Tribunal to pay a former employee (B) £20,000 after it was found that A had sexually harassed B and discriminated against B because of B’s gender.

The solicitor, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, was ordered (together with A’s firm) by an Employment Tribunal to pay £20,000 to a former paralegal at the law firm (which also cannot be identified), after A subjected B to a number of sexually-explicit and implicit comments and then sacked B.

After being sacked, the former paralegal made an Employment Tribunal claim for sexual harassment and sex discrimination, alleging that they had been fired from their job for refusing A’s sexual advances. B told the Employment Tribunal at a hearing earlier this year that the following had occurred during the course of their employment:

  • That A had asked B for photographs of B and asked B whether they were “spoken for” before B took the job at A’s firm
  • That A had told B that there were double showers in the office and asked B to marry A
  • That A had “indundated” B with text messages and had asked B to go to the cinema with A
  • That on one occasion A had told the paralegal that A was putting a double bed in the office of A’s firm for a “chill-out area out of hours”
  • That A had commented on B’s figure, telling B that B was “stocky”

B also gave evidence that B had told A that B had a partner – although this was not true – to prevent A from making further sexual advances towards B. Shortly after B told him this, however, A fired her, telling B that A could not pay B because of a problem with the cash flow of the business.

A denied making the any of the alleged comments to A’s former paralegal and claimed that A had made B redundant. However, the Employment Tribunal ruled in B’s favour in respect of B’s claims for sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Employment Judge Katherine Ross stated in the judgment: “There was a clear course of conduct where A, the owner of the business, engaged in unwanted sexual conduct. The claimant had continually rejected A’s advances. B avoided being alone with A. We are satisfied that the true reason for the claimant’s dismissal was because of B’s rejection of A’s conduct.”

A and A’s law firm were jointly ordered to pay compensation to the former paralegal as result of the sexual harassment, including £14,000 for injury to feelings, £4,000 in aggravated damages, and loss of earnings of £2,111.

The case is the subject of a Restricted Reporting Order and no details of the identity of any of the parties to the case can therefore be revealed.

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans Solicitors, commented on the case: “It is absolutely unacceptable for any worker to be subjected to unwanted comments of a sexual nature by colleagues and A has had a sizeable award made against A and A’s firm because A has done so. Businesses should take allegations of sexual harassment in the workplace extremely seriously and should have policies and procedures in place to ensure that any complaints of sexual harassment are dealt with efficiently and fairly.”

It is believed that A is appealing the judgment of the Employment Tribunal.

UPDATE (08/09/2014): Please note that the original version of this article identified the parties to this litigation. It has subsequently been brought to our attention that a Restricted Reporting Order was in place which was intended to prevent identification of either the claimant or the respondents. This article has therefore been updated to obscure the identification of the parties. Redmans apologises for any inconvenience or distress that has been caused to either of the parties.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 3 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 4 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago