Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

There has been much litigation in recent years relating to parental leave of various sorts, whether that be Maternity Leave (ML), Paternity Leave, Adoption Leave (AL), or Shared Parental Leave (ShPL). The recent case of Mr B Price v Powys County Council UKEAT/0133/20/LA (V) heard by the EAT related to the final two, AL and ShPL.


The Claimant wanted to take ShPL on the birth of his new baby. He was informed that he would only be entitled to an amount equal to that of statutory maternity pay. He brought a claim in the ET for direct discrimination.

For there to be direct discrimination established, a Claimant must show that a person, because of the Claimant’s protected characteristic, treats the Claimant less favourably than others. This requires the use of a comparator. The Claimant in this case alleged that he was being discriminated against on the basis of his sex, and used two comparators: a female worker on ML, and a female worker on AL. The Tribunal rejected the ML element of the claim because of the fact that ML’s intended purposes go beyond that of merely providing childcare (which was the intended purpose of ShPL), and therefore was materially different. The question which remained for the Tribunal was whether AL was materially different to ShPL. It concluded that it was, and the Claimant appealed to the EAT

Differences in leave

The first ground of appeal related to the provision of parental leave itself: namely that the purpose of ShPL was to allow for the provision of childcare, and that AL should be regarded in the same way. The EAT rejected this ground on the basis that AL extended well beyond childcare alone; e.g. as AL could commence before placement of the child, the purpose would be “to enable the adoptive parents to prepare both themselves and their environment for the placement of the child.”

Differences between Claimant and comparator

There were four factors set out by the Tribunal which the EAT concluded were correct in differentiating a claimant on ShPL to a female comparator on AL. They were:

  • AL could commence before a child’s placement, whereas ShPL could not

The EAT considered this difference not immaterial, as AL is about more than just the facilitation of child-care. There could, of course, be no question of taking ShPL at such an early stage when there is no child to look after.

  • AL is an immediate entitlement, whereas ShPL is not

ShPL can commence at any time during the child’s first year, whereas AL commences, at latest, on the date of the child’s placement. That, according to the EAT, is a material difference underlining the need for an adopter to have time at the commencement of the placement to prepare and maintain a safe and stable environment for the child and to develop a parental bond

  • ShPL can only be taken with the partner’s agreement to give up AL

The Claimant argued that at the point of electing which adoptive parent is to be the adopter for the purposes of the PALR, the partner who is not elected is giving up an entitlement. However, the EAT ruled that, at the point at which that election is made, neither partner has any entitlement to forego.

  • ShPL must be taken within 52 weeks of the placement and that within the period it could be “dipped in and out”.

By contrast, ordinary AL may be taken by the adopter in a continuous period of up to 26 weeks commencing no later than the date of placement of the child. Such leave is consistent with the purposes described which, in the view of the EAT, extend beyond childcare.

Our lawyers’ views on the case of Mr B Price v Powys County Council UKEAT/0133/20/LA (V)

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment team, commented on the case as follows: “This case again shows that adoption leave, or other forms of leave, cannot be compared directly to maternity leave when creating comparators for discrimination claims.”

Link to judgment: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/606448fae90e074e4d4ceb51/Mr_B_Price_v_Powys_County_Council_UKEAT_0133_20_LA__V_.pdf

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry


    4.80 Average

    312 Reviews


    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 day ago


    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 2 days ago


    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 2 days ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 weeks ago


    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Melanie M

    Very happy with the detailed advice provided from Redmans. They also helped me to secure a higher settlement than originally offered by my employer and were extremely diligent. I first spoke with Chris at relatively short notice and then Sacha dealt with my case. Would definitely recommend and use again in the future if needed.

    Posted 1 month ago


    Redmans helped me with a work related issue, which was resolved quickly and professionally. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 month ago

    James F

    Great people, really friendly and professional helped with everything that I needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anusha S

    My case was handled by Sacha who was very thorough and helped me to achieve a good outcome with my employer. Sacha was very personal, professional and helped me during quite a stressful time, so I am hugely grateful to her and to Redmans. This was my first time engaging with a law firm so I wasn't sure what to expect but I can definitely say that it was a good experience overall and I ended up better off due to having the help of an experienced and proactive solicitor on my side.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Diane P

    So grateful that I contacted Redmans to deal with my Redundancy Agreement. Everything from the initial call to the completion of the matter was professional, efficient and effective. I was listened to, had everything explained simply and kept informed of every step. I received super advice and the costs were very competitive. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking similar help. First class service - thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Chris L

    It was a very efficient and effective service - Would recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago


    Exceeded my expectations. Very professional and proactive. I highly recommend them.

    Posted 1 month ago