Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Sex discrimination at work – a quick guide

You have the right not to be discriminated against at work because of your sex – a brief guide to your rights are laid out below

Table of contents

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination occurs when you are treated poorly in the workplace because you are ale or female.

The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because

  • You are (or are not) a particular sex.
  • Someone thinks you are the opposite sex. This is known as discrimination by perception.
  • You are connected to someone of a particular sex. This is known as discrimination by association.

In the Equality Act sex can mean either male or female, or a group of people like men or boys, or women or girls.

There are a variety of types of discrimination that can occur in the workplace, including:

  1. Direct sex discrimination
  2. Indirect sex discrimination
  3. Harassment related to your sex
  4. Sexual harassment
  5. Victimisation

A brief guide to these types of discrimination is detailed below.

Back to contents

Examples of sex discrimination

Below are some examples of situations in which you may be subject to sex discrimination:

  • Your employer gives a promotion to an equally-qualified male colleague because of her sex rather than because of his skills and/or qualifications – this would constitute direct sex discrimination
  • Your employer decides to change shift patterns for staff so that they finish at 5 pm instead of 3pm. Female employees with caring responsibilities could be at a disadvantage if the new shift pattern means they cannot collect their children from school or childcare – this would constitute indirect sex discrimination
  • One of your managers makes comments that there is no point promoting women because they “go off to have children”. Even though he doesn’t direct these comments at a particular female colleague of yours, one of your colleagues is very upset by this and worries about her career. This could constitute sex-related harassment
  • One of your colleagues puts a pornographic screen saver on his computer. You see this and are offended. This could constitute sexual harassment
  • You complain that you have witnessed a colleague being sexually harassed at work by your line manager. Your line manager finds out about your complaint and gives you a poor appraisal because of your complaint, rather than because of your actual performance. This could constitute victimisation

Back to contents

Case study – Collinson v Dr Michie & Others (t/a Blacketts Medical Practice) ET/2501780/2018

In the case of Collinson v Dr Michie & Others (t/a Blacketts Medical Practice ET/2501780/2018 the Employment Tribunal held that an employee’s associative disability discrimination claim succeeded when her employer insisted she be available to cover sickness absences at short notice because they were worried about her having to care for her disabled twin

Our analysis of the case can be found here

The Employment Tribunal’s judgment can be found here


Employment Tribunal cases involving sex discrimination

Direct sex discrimination

In Smith v Rees ET/2501040/12, a tribunal found that the treatment of a female employee was less favourable. The employee, a waitress, was given a blouse to wear which she felt was too low, too tight, and showed too much cleavage. She told her employer that she would not be comfortable wearing the blouse and the employer accused her of being a “prude”. She was dismissed, and an employment tribunal upheld her discrimination claim. It concluded that a male employee would not have been required to wear a uniform like that, and that therefore the waitress had been treated less favourably on the grounds of her sex.

Indirect sex discrimination

In Faulkner v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary UKEAT/0505/05, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a policy at Hampshire Police Force that police officers in a personal relationship should not work together as supervisor and subordinate was indirect discrimination, but that the policy was objectively justified – it was a proportionate way of meeting the need to manage the risk that undue influence or favouritism would affect the integrity of one or both of the partners in the relationship, or would be perceived to do so

Harassment related to sex

In Nathwani v University of the Arts London ET/2201741/11, an Employment Tribunal held that a female colleague’s behaviour relating to a past relationship between them could amount to conduct “related to” an employee’s sex. In this case Ms Nathwani complained of harassment in relation to the behaviour of her line manager after their personal, sexual relationship had ended. Her former lover’s behaviour included his continued statements about his feelings for the claimant, speaking to M Nathwani’s colleagues about his feelings towards her, and treating her in a “cold manner”. The Employment Tribunal held that Ms Nathwani’s colleague’s behaviour amounted to unwanted conduct relating to Ms Nathwani’s sex. The manager would not have had similar feelings for a man, and nor would he have expressed himself in such a way to a man.

Sexual harassment

In Vickers v Hill Biscuits Ltd & Mr Ravenscroft ET/2405509/2016 the Employment Tribunal held that a manager writing “Lisa it’s your birthday, I bet you’re thrilled to bits, but not as much as I would be if I could feel your TxxS!!!” constituted sexual harassment and awarded the claimant £10,000 in compensation.

Victimisation

In Martin v Devonshires Solicitors UKEAT/0086/10 an employee brought multiple false grievances in good faith, but mistakenly due to her mental illness. The EAT found her subsequent dismissal to be fair and not unlawful victimisation. Features of the complaints which led to the employer’s decision to dismiss, including their serious nature, the number of complaints made, the employee’s failure to accept they were as a result of her mental illness and the time and internal resources taken up dealing with them, were “properly separable” from the protected acts

Back to contents

Direct sex discrimination

Direct sex discrimination occurs when you are treated less favourably than your colleagues because you are male or female. To establish direct discrimination, you must show that you have been treated less favourably in some way than your employer has treated a real comparator, or would treat a hypothetical comparator.

The definition of direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 is:

A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others.s.13 Equality Act 2010

Example

A female worker’s appraisal duties are withdrawn while her male colleagues at the same grade continue to carry out appraisals. Although she was not demoted and did not suffer any financial disadvantage, she feels demeaned in the eyes of those she managed and in the eyes of her colleagues. The removal of her appraisal duties may be treating her less favourably than her male colleagues. If the less favourable treatment is because of her sex, this o iwould amount to direct discrimination

Back to contents

Indirect sex discrimination

Under the Equality Act 2010, indirect discrimination occurs when:

(1) A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a provision, criterion or practice is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s if –  (a) A applies, or would apply, it to persons with whom B does not share the characteristic (b) it puts, or would put, persons with whom B shares the characteristic at a particular disadvantage when compared with persons with whom B does not share it, (c) it puts, or would put, B at that disadvantage, and (d) A cannot show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aims.19 Equality Act 2010
Example
A bus company adopts a policy that all female drivers must re-sit their theory and practical tests every five years to retain their category D licence. Such a policy would amount to direct discrimination because of sex. In contrast, another bus company adopts a policy that drivers on two particular routes must re-sit the theory test. Although this provision is apparently neutral, it turns out that the drivers on these two routes are nearly all women. This could amount to indirect sex discrimination unless the policy can be objectively justified

 

Back to contents

Speak to one of our expert employment solicitors about your case

If you think that you’ve been subjected to disability discrimination in the workplace then call one of our expert employment solicitors for a free consultation to discuss a potential Employment Tribunal claim today

phone-contact020 3397 3603

email-contact enquiries@redmans.co.uk

Harassment related to sex at work

You are protected against being harassed at work for a reason related to your sex. You may be able to take action about this.

“Harassment” occurs under s.26(1) of the Equality Act 2010 when:

(1) A person (A) harasses another (B) if –  (a) A engage in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, and  (b) the conduct has the purpose or effect of –  (i) violating B’s dignity, or (ii) creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for Bs.26(1) Equality Act 2010

You can therefore make a claim for harassment related to sex if, for example, you are male and one of your colleagues makes an offensive remark at women at work which violates your dignity or humiliates you.

Example

A female worker has a relationship with her male manager. On seeing her with another male colleague, the manager suspects she is having an affair. As a result, the manager makes her working life difficult by continually criticising her work in an offensive manner. The behaviour is not because of the sex of the female worker, but because of the suspected affair which is related to her sex. This could amount to harassment related to sex

Back to contents

Sexual harassment at work

Sexual harassment is defined under s.26(2) of the Equality Act 2010 as follows:

(2 )A also harasses B if—
(a) A engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, and
(b) the conduct has the purpose or effect referred to in subsection (1)(b)s.26(2) Equality Act 2010

The purpose or effect referred to in s.27(1)(b) is conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating your worker’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive  environment for you.

Conduct of “a sexual nature” covers a variety of different types of conduct, including verbal, non-verbal and/or physical contact, which occur in the course of employment. What is “in the course of employment” can sometimes be a grey area – if you’re sexually harassed whilst sitting at your desk in your workplace then it is pretty clear that this is in the course of employment. However, some examples are less clear-cut – what if you’re sexually harassed by a colleague on an evening out with work-mates, for instance? Each case very much depends on its particular facts and circumstances and you should seek expert employment law advice if you think you have been sexually harassed at work.

Example

Male members of staff download pornographic images on to their computers in an office where a woman works. She may make a claim for harassment if she is aware that the images are being downloaded and the effect of this is to create a hostile and humiliating environment for her. In this situation, it is irrelevant that the male members of staff did not have the purpose of upsetting the woman, and that they merely considered the downloading of images as ‘having a laugh’.

Back to contents

Victimisation

It is unlawful for you to be victimized because you have done a “protected act” (i.e. because you have complained of discrimination in any way).

Victimization is defined under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010:

(1) A person (A) victimises another person (B) if A subjects B to a detriment because— (a) B does a protected act, or (b) A believes that B has done, or may do, a protected act. (2) Each of the following is a protected act— (a) bringing proceedings under this Act; (b) giving evidence or information in connection with proceedings under this Act; (c) doing any other thing for the purposes of or in connection with this Act; (d) making an allegation (whether or not express) that A or another person has contravened this Act.s.27 Equality Act 2010

If you are subjected to any detriment because you have brought a claim for sex discrimination (or any other form of discrimination) under the Equality Act 2010, because you have given evidence in any claim for discrimination or, for example, you have made an allegation that your employer has breached the Equality Act 2010, then you may be able to make a claim for victimization to the Employment Tribunal.

Example

A grocery shop worker resigns after making a sexual harassment complaint against the owner. Several weeks later, she tries to make a purchase at the shop but is refused service by the owner because of her complaint. This could amount to victimisation.

Back to contents

The relationship between sex discrimination and pregnancy and maternity discrimination

The Equality Act 2010 states that “special treatment afforded to a woman in connection with pregnancy or childbirth” must generally be disregarded for the purposes of direct sex discrimination. A man cannot therefore normally claim that he has suffered sex discrimination because he has not been accorded the same special treatment as a pregnant woman.

Example

A man who is given a warning for being repeatedly late to work in the mornings alleges that he has been treated less favourably than a pregnant woman who has also been repeatedly late for work, but who was not given a warning. The man cannot compare himself to the pregnant woman, because her lateness is related to her morning sickness. The correct comparator in his case would be a non-pregnant woman who was also late for work

Back to contents

Action you can take if you think that you’re being discriminated against because of your sex

If you think that you are being discriminated against because of your sex then you should take action as soon as possible. Below are some examples of what you can do:

  • Inform your line manager that you believe that you are being discriminated against. Make sure that you put a complaint in writing (preferably by email so that there is a time and date stamp on the complaint and you can prove that it has been sent to the relevant person) and keep a copy. If you think that it is your line manager who is discriminating against you then make a complaint so someone else in a position of authority in your organisation.
  • Make a formal complaint (known as a “grievance”) to your HR department and also keep a copy of this
  • Obtain specialist advice from a qualified person – you can either consult a lawyer directly or make an appointment with the Citizens Advice Bureau to obtain initial advice
  • Collect evidence of the incidents that you think are discriminatory. An important thing to do is to keep a diary of all of the incidents of discrimination that you think that you have suffered and to record exactly who was involved and what happened. Try and obtain any witness evidence that you can from colleagues who have seen or heard things. Keep any letters, emails, minutes of meetings etc. that you think are relevant.

Back to contents

Speak to one of our expert employment solicitors about your case

If you think that you’ve been subjected to disability discrimination in the workplace then call one of our expert employment solicitors for a free consultation to discuss a potential Employment Tribunal claim today

phone-contact020 3397 3603

email-contact enquiries@redmans.co.uk

Making an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination

If you want to make an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination then you must do the following:

  • Make your claim within three months of the last date of discrimination (this is also known as the “limitation date”). The last date of discrimination can often be difficult to pinpoint so you must be extremely careful that you do not fall outside of the three-month period
  • Gather enough evidence to allow you to prove your case in the Tribunal – this includes both documentary evidence and, if applicable, witness evidence.

It’s important to note that (unlike, for example, unfair dismissal claims) you don’t need to have worked for your employer for any particular length of time to make a claim for sex discrimination – you have the right to do this from “day one”.

Until June 2017 you may have had to pay a fee to issue your claim for discrimination (or for a hearing in relation to such) unless you qualified for a fee remission. This rule no longer applies.

Back to contents

What can you do if you’re victimized for making a complaint of sex discrimination?

If you do any of the acts listed below (known as a “protected act”) and are then subjected to any form of detriment or dismissal because you have done so then you may be able to make a claim for “victimization” under the Equality Act. A protected act can include:

  • Making or threatening to make an informal or formal complaint about sex discrimination within your organisation
  • Helping a colleague to make a complaint or helping them with their Employment Tribunal claim regarding sex discrimination
  • Making or threatening to make an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination

Back to contents

Call Redmans today to discuss your employment law matter

Call Redmans on 020 3397 3603 or email us at enquiries@redmans.co.uk to discuss your employment law matter.

Alternatively, you can call Chris Hadrill, the partner responsible for the employment department, on 020 3397 3601 or email him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk.

Call us

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.79 Average

    273 Reviews

    Mark M

    I found Redmans very easy to work with. Mel was very responsive, her advice led to an improved settlement. . Recommended.!

    Posted 2 days ago

    Anonymous

    Fantastic service. I would recommend Redmans to anyone who needed a Solicitor. The communication was second to none and consistent clear guidance was given.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Anonymous

    Everyone I dealt with at Redmans were professional, empathetic & always responded promptly and helped make the transition as smooth & efficient as possible for me. If you need legal advice, don’t hesitate & contact the team.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was incredibly helpful and professional. Timely and accurate advice at a time I most needed it. I was extremely impressed and grateful.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Sue W

    The people at Redmans talk to you with respect and make you feel like they take your situation personal. They clearly care and are extremely professional. I have recommended Redmans to many people.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans Solicitors were consistently prompt, efficient and professional from the start of my reaching out to them for support in relation to contentious negotiations of an employment matter that continued for almost two months resulting in a positive settlement agreement. Chris Hadrill was diligent, thorough, empathetic and objective in his advice and guidance, showing deep and broad knowledge of the law and legal processes plus extensive practical experience in handling complex matters, resulting in clear and pragmatic advice in ambiguous circumstances that resulted in a very good outcome. I fully recommend Chris Hadrill and Redmans Solicitors! I have made this review anonymous purely because of the confidentiality obligations in the settlement agreement concluded.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Michelle W

    Redmans solicitors provided legal support and advice for a settlement agreement. Excellent customer service, very professional. The senior associate solicitor kept me updated throughout the process, showed empathy and the agreement was signed-off / completed within the agreed timeline.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Mark W

    Redmans Solicitors were extremely professional and helpful! Chris Hadrill handled my case and was an amazing help! His guidance, advice and understanding to my redundancy settlement were always clear, concise and very helpful and I am very grateful to him, and glad I found Redmans to help with my settlement. I highly recommend them!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Alison M

    Very happy with the advice I received

    Posted 2 months ago

    Margaret A

    I found everything about the company to be extremely professional and efficient. During my initial contact with Chris, he listened well and was reassuring, so I felt confident that my case would be well handled. Caroline was excellent at explaining all the legal points and answering my questions, as well as being very supportive and understanding throughout the process. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sanja K

    Very efficient and professional service.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I found the advice I was given by Redmans Solicitors to be clear and useful and found the solicitor on my case to be both knowledgeable and approachable.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Karen T

    Great service. Thank you.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service from Chris & Mel Chin. The best outcome was achieved from the redundancy process. They were extremely thorough, listened carefully and acted swiftly on my behalf. I highly recommend Redmans Solicitors

    Posted 2 months ago

    Shanine M

    Excellent service, thank you so much!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I found Caroline and Chris very Helpful and provided excellent service. Caroline especially provided great legal advice and made me feel at ease with the whole process. I would highly recommend them. Thank you!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Gayle B

    Excellent company very professional would definitely recommend

    Posted 2 months ago

    Alex K

    Redmans provided an excellent service, timely and effective. Will definitely recommend.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Great job done on my employment law

    Posted 2 months ago

    Dominica S

    Caroline & Chris were very prompt and efficient.Very happy with the service and will definitely recommend Redmans Solicitor to everyone !

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sandra K

    If you are looking for a group of solicitors who are Professional, Caring and on point, then look no futher than Redmans. I was literally hand held through out my case. Can not find fault with this company, very happy with the result and the service i received. Would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 2 months ago