Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Sex discrimination at work – a quick guide

You have the right not to be discriminated against at work because of your sex – a brief guide to your rights are laid out below

Table of contents

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination occurs when you are treated poorly in the workplace because you are ale or female.

The Equality Act 2010 says you must not be discriminated against because

  • You are (or are not) a particular sex.
  • Someone thinks you are the opposite sex. This is known as discrimination by perception.
  • You are connected to someone of a particular sex. This is known as discrimination by association.

In the Equality Act sex can mean either male or female, or a group of people like men or boys, or women or girls.

There are a variety of types of discrimination that can occur in the workplace, including:

  1. Direct sex discrimination
  2. Indirect sex discrimination
  3. Harassment related to your sex
  4. Sexual harassment
  5. Victimisation

A brief guide to these types of discrimination is detailed below.

Back to contents

Examples of sex discrimination

Below are some examples of situations in which you may be subject to sex discrimination:

  • Your employer gives a promotion to an equally-qualified male colleague because of her sex rather than because of his skills and/or qualifications – this would constitute direct sex discrimination
  • Your employer decides to change shift patterns for staff so that they finish at 5 pm instead of 3pm. Female employees with caring responsibilities could be at a disadvantage if the new shift pattern means they cannot collect their children from school or childcare – this would constitute indirect sex discrimination
  • One of your managers makes comments that there is no point promoting women because they “go off to have children”. Even though he doesn’t direct these comments at a particular female colleague of yours, one of your colleagues is very upset by this and worries about her career. This could constitute sex-related harassment
  • One of your colleagues puts a pornographic screen saver on his computer. You see this and are offended. This could constitute sexual harassment
  • You complain that you have witnessed a colleague being sexually harassed at work by your line manager. Your line manager finds out about your complaint and gives you a poor appraisal because of your complaint, rather than because of your actual performance. This could constitute victimisation

Back to contents

Employment Tribunal cases involving sex discrimination

Direct sex discrimination

In Smith v Rees ET/2501040/12, a tribunal found that the treatment of a female employee was less favourable. The employee, a waitress, was given a blouse to wear which she felt was too low, too tight, and showed too much cleavage. She told her employer that she would not be comfortable wearing the blouse and the employer accused her of being a “prude”. She was dismissed, and an employment tribunal upheld her discrimination claim. It concluded that a male employee would not have been required to wear a uniform like that, and that therefore the waitress had been treated less favourably on the grounds of her sex.

Indirect sex discrimination

In Faulkner v Chief Constable of Hampshire Constabulary UKEAT/0505/05, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that a policy at Hampshire Police Force that police officers in a personal relationship should not work together as supervisor and subordinate was indirect discrimination, but that the policy was objectively justified – it was a proportionate way of meeting the need to manage the risk that undue influence or favouritism would affect the integrity of one or both of the partners in the relationship, or would be perceived to do so

Harassment related to sex

In Nathwani v University of the Arts London ET/2201741/11, an Employment Tribunal held that a female colleague’s behaviour relating to a past relationship between them could amount to conduct “related to” an employee’s sex. In this case Ms Nathwani complained of harassment in relation to the behaviour of her line manager after their personal, sexual relationship had ended. Her former lover’s behaviour included his continued statements about his feelings for the claimant, speaking to M Nathwani’s colleagues about his feelings towards her, and treating her in a “cold manner”. The Employment Tribunal held that Ms Nathwani’s colleague’s behaviour amounted to unwanted conduct relating to Ms Nathwani’s sex. The manager would not have had similar feelings for a man, and nor would he have expressed himself in such a way to a man.

Sexual harassment

In Vickers v Hill Biscuits Ltd & Mr Ravenscroft ET/2405509/2016 the Employment Tribunal held that a manager writing “Lisa it’s your birthday, I bet you’re thrilled to bits, but not as much as I would be if I could feel your TxxS!!!” constituted sexual harassment and awarded the claimant £10,000 in compensation.


In Martin v Devonshires Solicitors UKEAT/0086/10 an employee brought multiple false grievances in good faith, but mistakenly due to her mental illness. The EAT found her subsequent dismissal to be fair and not unlawful victimisation. Features of the complaints which led to the employer’s decision to dismiss, including their serious nature, the number of complaints made, the employee’s failure to accept they were as a result of her mental illness and the time and internal resources taken up dealing with them, were “properly separable” from the protected acts

Back to contents

Direct sex discrimination

Direct sex discrimination occurs when you are treated less favourably than your colleagues because you are male or female. To establish direct discrimination, you must show that you have been treated less favourably in some way than your employer has treated a real comparator, or would treat a hypothetical comparator.

The definition of direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 is:

A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if, because of a protected characteristic, A treats B less favourably than A treats or would treat others.s.13 Equality Act 2010


A female worker’s appraisal duties are withdrawn while her male colleagues at the same grade continue to carry out appraisals. Although she was not demoted and did not suffer any financial disadvantage, she feels demeaned in the eyes of those she managed and in the eyes of her colleagues. The removal of her appraisal duties may be treating her less favourably than her male colleagues. If the less favourable treatment is because of her sex, this o iwould amount to direct discrimination

Back to contents

Indirect sex discrimination

Under the Equality Act 2010, indirect discrimination occurs when:

(1) A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a provision, criterion or practice is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s if –  (a) A applies, or would apply, it to persons with whom B does not share the characteristic (b) it puts, or would put, persons with whom B shares the characteristic at a particular disadvantage when compared with persons with whom B does not share it, (c) it puts, or would put, B at that disadvantage, and (d) A cannot show it to be a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aims.19 Equality Act 2010
A bus company adopts a policy that all female drivers must re-sit their theory and practical tests every five years to retain their category D licence. Such a policy would amount to direct discrimination because of sex. In contrast, another bus company adopts a policy that drivers on two particular routes must re-sit the theory test. Although this provision is apparently neutral, it turns out that the drivers on these two routes are nearly all women. This could amount to indirect sex discrimination unless the policy can be objectively justified

Back to contents

Harassment related to sex at work

You are protected against being harassed at work for a reason related to your sex. You may be able to take action about this.

“Harassment” occurs under s.26(1) of the Equality Act 2010 when:

(1) A person (A) harasses another (B) if –  (a) A engage in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, and  (b) the conduct has the purpose or effect of –  (i) violating B’s dignity, or (ii) creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for Bs.26(1) Equality Act 2010

You can therefore make a claim for harassment related to sex if, for example, you are male and one of your colleagues makes an offensive remark at women at work which violates your dignity or humiliates you.


A female worker has a relationship with her male manager. On seeing her with another male colleague, the manager suspects she is having an affair. As a result, the manager makes her working life difficult by continually criticising her work in an offensive manner. The behaviour is not because of the sex of the female worker, but because of the suspected affair which is related to her sex. This could amount to harassment related to sex

Back to contents

Sexual harassment at work

Sexual harassment is defined under s.26(2) of the Equality Act 2010 as follows:

(2 )A also harasses B if—
(a) A engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual nature, and
(b) the conduct has the purpose or effect referred to in subsection (1)(b)s.26(2) Equality Act 2010

The purpose or effect referred to in s.27(1)(b) is conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating your worker’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive  environment for you.

Conduct of “a sexual nature” covers a variety of different types of conduct, including verbal, non-verbal and/or physical contact, which occur in the course of employment. What is “in the course of employment” can sometimes be a grey area – if you’re sexually harassed whilst sitting at your desk in your workplace then it is pretty clear that this is in the course of employment. However, some examples are less clear-cut – what if you’re sexually harassed by a colleague on an evening out with work-mates, for instance? Each case very much depends on its particular facts and circumstances and you should seek expert employment law advice if you think you have been sexually harassed at work.


Male members of staff download pornographic images on to their computers in an office where a woman works. She may make a claim for harassment if she is aware that the images are being downloaded and the effect of this is to create a hostile and humiliating environment for her. In this situation, it is irrelevant that the male members of staff did not have the purpose of upsetting the woman, and that they merely considered the downloading of images as ‘having a laugh’.

Back to contents


It is unlawful for you to be victimized because you have done a “protected act” (i.e. because you have complained of discrimination in any way).

Victimization is defined under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010:

(1) A person (A) victimises another person (B) if A subjects B to a detriment because— (a) B does a protected act, or (b) A believes that B has done, or may do, a protected act. (2) Each of the following is a protected act— (a) bringing proceedings under this Act; (b) giving evidence or information in connection with proceedings under this Act; (c) doing any other thing for the purposes of or in connection with this Act; (d) making an allegation (whether or not express) that A or another person has contravened this Act.s.27 Equality Act 2010

If you are subjected to any detriment because you have brought a claim for sex discrimination (or any other form of discrimination) under the Equality Act 2010, because you have given evidence in any claim for discrimination or, for example, you have made an allegation that your employer has breached the Equality Act 2010, then you may be able to make a claim for victimization to the Employment Tribunal.


A grocery shop worker resigns after making a sexual harassment complaint against the owner. Several weeks later, she tries to make a purchase at the shop but is refused service by the owner because of her complaint. This could amount to victimisation.

Back to contents

The relationship between sex discrimination and pregnancy and maternity discrimination

The Equality Act 2010 states that “special treatment afforded to a woman in connection with pregnancy or childbirth” must generally be disregarded for the purposes of direct sex discrimination. A man cannot therefore normally claim that he has suffered sex discrimination because he has not been accorded the same special treatment as a pregnant woman.


A man who is given a warning for being repeatedly late to work in the mornings alleges that he has been treated less favourably than a pregnant woman who has also been repeatedly late for work, but who was not given a warning. The man cannot compare himself to the pregnant woman, because her lateness is related to her morning sickness. The correct comparator in his case would be a non-pregnant woman who was also late for work

Back to contents

Action you can take if you think that you’re being discriminated against because of your sex

If you think that you are being discriminated against because of your sex then you should take action as soon as possible. Below are some examples of what you can do:

  • Inform your line manager that you believe that you are being discriminated against. Make sure that you put a complaint in writing (preferably by email so that there is a time and date stamp on the complaint and you can prove that it has been sent to the relevant person) and keep a copy. If you think that it is your line manager who is discriminating against you then make a complaint so someone else in a position of authority in your organisation.
  • Make a formal complaint (known as a “grievance”) to your HR department and also keep a copy of this
  • Obtain specialist advice from a qualified person – you can either consult a lawyer directly or make an appointment with the Citizens Advice Bureau to obtain initial advice
  • Collect evidence of the incidents that you think are discriminatory. An important thing to do is to keep a diary of all of the incidents of discrimination that you think that you have suffered and to record exactly who was involved and what happened. Try and obtain any witness evidence that you can from colleagues who have seen or heard things. Keep any letters, emails, minutes of meetings etc. that you think are relevant.

Back to contents

Making an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination

If you want to make an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination then you must do the following:

  • Make your claim within three months of the last date of discrimination (this is also known as the “limitation date”). The last date of discrimination can often be difficult to pinpoint so you must be extremely careful that you do not fall outside of the three-month period
  • Gather enough evidence to allow you to prove your case in the Tribunal – this includes both documentary evidence and, if applicable, witness evidence.

It’s important to note that (unlike, for example, unfair dismissal claims) you don’t need to have worked for your employer for any particular length of time to make a claim for sex discrimination – you have the right to do this from “day one”.

Until June 2017 you may have had to pay a fee to issue your claim for discrimination (or for a hearing in relation to such) unless you qualified for a fee remission. This rule no longer applies.

Back to contents

What can you do if you’re victimized for making a complaint of sex discrimination?

If you do any of the acts listed below (known as a “protected act”) and are then subjected to any form of detriment or dismissal because you have done so then you may be able to make a claim for “victimization” under the Equality Act. A protected act can include:

  • Making or threatening to make an informal or formal complaint about sex discrimination within your organisation
  • Helping a colleague to make a complaint or helping them with their Employment Tribunal claim regarding sex discrimination
  • Making or threatening to make an Employment Tribunal claim for sex discrimination

Back to contents

Call Redmans today to discuss your employment law matter

Call Redmans on 020 3397 3603 or email us at enquiries@redmans.co.uk to discuss your employment law matter.

Alternatively, you can call Chris Hadrill, the partner responsible for the employment department, on 020 3397 3601 or email him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk.

Call us
Chris Hadrill
Name: Chris Hadrill
Position: Partner
Email: chadrill@redmans.co.uk
Telephone: 020 3397 3601
View Chris' profile

Disability discrimination

Our guide explains that you can't be discriminated against because you are disabled. It covers rights your right to have reasonable adjustments made to the workplace to compensate your disability, your right not to be treated less favourably because you are disabled, and your right not to be subjected to a detriment as a consequence of your disability. It also includes a guide to what action you can potentially take if you believe that you are being discriminated against because you are disabled.

Basic rights at work

Rights at work includes the right to time off work, your contract of employment, your rights regarding health and safety, regarding trade unions, discrimination, harassment, bullying, harassment, victimization, and whistleblowing

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk


4.76 Average

204 Reviews


Excellent advice and customer service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Aneet G

I would definitely recommend Redmans. Very impressed with service provided. They were extremely proactive in handling my case which made things easier for me. Provided sound advice and resolution. Special credit for this goes to Chris who dealt with my case with great determination and consideration.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Fern M

Very efficient and friendly

Posted 4 weeks ago

Neville S

A professional and friendly service, which I would highly recommend.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Daniel T

Extremely helpful and made a bad situation much more manageable. Where other solicitors seemed disinterested in my situation Redmans immediately made me feel like it was a team effort to achieve a more favourable outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Paul T

Excellent, quick and informative. Chris was a real star and gave me confidence during the uncertainty if a redundancy settlement.

Posted 1 month ago

Marina E

Felt in very capable hands was listened to and given excellent advice. Would not hesitate to recomend and use again if needed.

Posted 1 month ago

Rosa B

Fabulous service all round.

Posted 1 month ago


Redmans were quick to respond to my enquiry and dealt with my case professionally and personably. I received sound advice and was put at ease by Chris Hadrill, Partner.

Posted 1 month ago

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 2 months ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 months ago


Posted 3 months ago


I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 months ago


Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 months ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 months ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 months ago


Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 months ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 months ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 months ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 3 months ago