Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

A case in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (Solomon v University of Hertfordshire) recently analysed what a fair contribution for an employer to offer in terms of an employee’s legal costs (for advice on a settlement agreement) would be.

The facts

Ms Solomon was dismissed from her employment with the University of Hertfordshire (“the University”) after concerns were raised regarding her timekeeping, sickness absence. and the quality of her work.

Ms Solomon subsequently brought claims in the Employment Tribunal for discrimination, harassment, and victimisation, based on the protected characteristics of discrimination, harassment and victimisation – in all, Ms Solomon pursued 38 separate allegations of discrimination.

Prior to the full merits hearing taking place, the University offered Ms Solomon £50,000 as a without prejudice settlement offer – the University confirmed that Ms Solomon would need to enter into a settlement agreement and that it would cover the cost of the advice on the agreement up to maximum of £500 plus VAT. Ms Solomon was pursuing the claim herself, and she said that enquired with solicitors as to the cost of receiving legal advice; however, she did not instruct a solicitor to advise her on the settlement agreement, and she said that she did not do so because she had been told that the cost of legal advice would be significantly greater than £500 plus VAT.

Ms Solomon rejected the offer of £50,000 and the case went to the full merits hearing, whereupon she lost her claims for discrimination but succeeded with her claim for unfair dismissal. The Employment Tribunal awarded her £1,900 in compensation.

The University made an application to the Employment Tribunal to recoup something of its £122,000 legal bill – it argued, among other reasons, that her refusal of the offer of £50,000 was particularly unreasonable conduct meriting an award of costs.

The Employment Tribunal found in the University’s favour on its application for costs, ordering that Ms Solomon pay a contribution of £20,000 towards its legal costs. The Employment Tribunal held that, among other things, it was unreasonable for Mrs Solomon to fail to take legal advice on the offer of the settlement agreement and, further, for her to turn the offer down.

Ms Solomon submitted an application to the Employment Appeal Tribunal against the award of costs (as well as on liability).

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal in respect of the costs application, holding that Mrs Solomon’s conduct may have been unreasonable, but it was not so unreasonable to warrant an award of costs against her (particularly given that she was a litigant in person).

Was the legal fee contribution for advice on the merits of the settlement agreement and on the claim reasonable?

The EAT also commented on the University’s offer to pay £500 plus VAT towards her legal fees: the EAT stated that it was clear that this fee was to advise Mrs Solomon on the terms and effect of the settlement agreement and that it was “wholly unrealistic” for the University to expect that the contribution of such a sum would be sufficient to allow a solicitor “to advise on the merits of settlement”.

Our solicitors’ comments on the case

Chris Hadrill, the partner in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that, among other things, Respondents must be realistic about the level of legal fees that they should pay in order to encourage a litigant-in-person to not only seek advice on the terms and effect of a settlement agreement but also on the merits of any claim – the latter issue will likely take a great deal more time and consideration, and my therefore warrant a higher cost contribution.”

Redmans’ full analysis of the case of Solomon v University of Hertfordshire & anor UKEAT/0258/18/DA can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

197 Reviews

Rosa B

Fabulous service all round.

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Redmans were quick to respond to my enquiry and dealt with my case professionally and personably. I received sound advice and was put at ease by Chris Hadrill, Partner.

Posted 3 days ago

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 1 week ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 1 month ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Posted 1 month ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 2 months ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 2 months ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 2 months ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 2 months ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 2 months ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 2 months ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago