Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case concerns allegations of (time-barred) professional negligence and breach of contract by a firm of solicitors in the 1980’s, and attempts by the Claimants to circumvent the limitation dates by pleading their case on the basis of fraud or breach of fiduciary duty (an approach that got short shrift).

The facts in Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

Musical Youth (of which there were five members) were a successful reggae band in the 1980’s. They released an extremely successful song called “Pass the Dutchie” in 1983 and broke up shortly afterwards. “Pass the Dutchie” was accepted to have been a cover of a Mighty Diamonds song called “Pass the Kouchie”, which was itself apparently derived from  a song by Jackie Mittoo called “Full Up”. However, it was established that Musical Youth’s “Pass the Dutchie” had sufficient originality to qualify for copyright protection under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988.

Mr Seddon (a partner in “Woolf Seddon”) acted as legal representatives on Musical Youth’s behalf, their retainer being signed with Musical Youth in 1982. A dispute arose in 1984 concerning who was to be credited for “Pass the Dutchie” and Woolf Seddon investigated. The rights holder for “Pass the Kouchie” in Europe were found to be two companies (“Peter A” and “Peter B”), who wished to issue proceedings against an American company (“Sparta Florida”) with the intention that “Pass the Dutchie” should be solely credited to “Peter A” and “Peter B” (“the two Peters”), not “Sparta Florida”. Woolf Seddon agreed to represent the two Peters on this basis and reached an agreement with Sparta Florida later that year (“the Sparta Florida Agreement”), an agreement that split the proceeds of royalties for “Pass the Dutchie” half and half between the two Peters, the monies for the two Peters to be received into Woolf Seddon’s client account. This was apparently on the basis that Woolf Seddon believed that copyright for “Pass the Dutchie” would not be owned by Musical Youth but by the party that owned the copyright in “Pass the Kouchie”.

Mr Seaton, one of the members of Musical Youth, later discovered the existence of this agreement and suspected that he may have not been paid royalties in “Pass the Dutchie” that he was entitled to. He therefore issued claims against Woolf Seddon (among others) on the basis that there was fundamental conflict of interest in Mr Seddon acting for both Musical Youth and the two Peters. Further, he was in breach of contract for failing to advise Musical Youth on their entitlement to copyright in “Pass the Dutchie” and had failed to account for and represent the interests of Musical Youth in the Sparta Florida Agreement. This would generally give rise to claims of professional negligence and breach of contract but for the fact that these claims would have long passed their limitation dates. The Claimants therefore sought to advance their case on the basis of fraudulent breach of fiduciary trust and making false representations.

The Claimants issued their claim in 2010. Woolf Seddon applied for summary judgment in the claim against them on the grounds that there was no legal basis for the existing claims and any other claims were time-barred.

The law relating to professional negligence and breach of contract

A professional adviser can face a claim based on his work through various means:

  • Breach of contract
  • Breach of duty of care (tort of negligence)
  • Breach of fiduciary duty
  • Breach of statutory duty

Generally, professional advisers will have a contract (also known as a “retainer”) with their clients. This is, in effect, a contract of employment and outlines the rights and duties of each party – the professional adviser and the client. Whether there has been a breach of contract will entail an examination of the express and implied terms of the contract.

However, there may be liability in tort for professional negligence as well as contract. Generally, both grounds (if they are within their respective limitation periods) are pleaded rather than in the alternative. Professional negligence would occur if the professional adviser breached their duty of care to their client by undertaking (or failing to undertake) certain actions. The standard of care expected is a relatively complicated issue and will not be covered in this article.

The limitation period for both contractual and tortious actions (in the main) is six years from the date of which the cause of action occurs.

The High Court’s judgment in Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

The High Court gave summary judgment to Woolf Seddon on the basis that it believed that the current proceedings were an attempt to transform a claim for professional negligence and breach of contract into fraud or dishonest breach of trust to avoid the problem that the claims were outside of their limitation date. The High Court further refused the Claimants permission to amend their Particulars of Claim to provide further particulars of the fraud allegedly committed by Woolf Seddon.

Our specialist dispute resolution & litigation solicitors’ views on Seaton & Ors v Seddon & Ors

This is an extremely complicated claim, arising from allegations of professional negligence and breach of contract committed by a firm of solicitors in the 1980s. Clients of professional advisers should be aware that there is a limitation on claims for professional negligence and breach of contract (if they don’t involve breach of fiduciary duty) and should be vigilant in determining whether their professional adviser has breached their duty of care towards them – or contract with them. Otherwise clients may find that they cannot pursue a remedy even though actionable loss has occurred.

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.77 Average

132 Reviews

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 1 month ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 9 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 10 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 11 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 11 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 11 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 11 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 11 months ago