Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Trust UKEAT/0247/18/JOJ the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) considered whether the Employment Tribunal had been correct to dismiss an employee’s direct discrimination and harassment claims.

The facts in Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Trust

Mr Colleridge Bessong (the ‘Claimant’) was a mental health nurse working for Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (the ‘Respondent’) in a secure residential unit for men sectioned under the Mental Health Act. The Claimant was a black African.  He was subjected to a serious assault by a patient accompanied by racist abuse which included the patient calling him a “f***ing black” and stating, ‘I’m going to stab you now’. The patient had a history of racist behaviour towards black members of staff. The Respondent made a record of the assault, but an incident report form made no mention of the racist abuse.

The Claimant then raised a grievance about the incident the following month, stating that hate crimes were being committed against staff on a daily basis and were going unpunished by the Respondent. He also alleged that the Respondent had failed to safeguard black staff members as a result of its inadequate incident reporting systems.

The Claimant’s grievance was not upheld, and he went on to make claims in the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) of direct and indirect race discrimination and racial harassment.

Employment Tribunal

The ET did not uphold the Claimant’s claims of harassment and direct discrimination because the Respondent’s failings (not ensuring that all incidents of racial abuse were reported by employees) were not themselves related to race.  However, it did hold the Respondent liable for indirect discrimination. 

It found that the failure to create a culture in which all racist incidents were formally reported contributed to an environment in which racial abuse from patients was more likely to occur. A perception had formed amongst many black staff that reporting every single racist incident was pointless.  The ET held that the failure to create a culture in which all such incidents were formally reported contributed to an environment in which racial abuse from patients was more likely to occur.

The Claimant appealed the ET’s decision to not uphold his direct discrimination and harassment claims to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the ‘EAT’).

Employment Appeal Tribunal

The Claimant’s appeal to the EAT focussed on the following points:

  • In interpreting section 26(1) of the EqA 2010 to require that an employer’s action or inaction must itself be related to race in a complaint of third-party harassment.
  • In holding that he was not entitled to rely directly on the EU Race Directive.

The EAT upheld the ET decision that the Respondent was not liable for harassment under s.26 EqA. It was not enough that the harassment related to race. The Respondent’s action or inaction had to be related to race and on the facts of this case it was not.

The EAT also considered whether the EU Race Directive requires Member States to outlaw third-party harassment where the harassment was foreseeable and preventable, without a requirement that the employer’s failures were themselves “related to” race.  It held that this could not be the case as, if it were, the impact would be to create a situation of strict liability for employers whereby they would be liable for acts of third-party harassment, irrespective of any motivational element relating to race on its part. 

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Trust UKEAT/0247/18/JOJ

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comments on the case: “Previously under section 40 of the EqA 2010 there were provisions in place to make employers liable for third party harassment.  Their removal in 2013 was controversial at the time and the need for protection for employees has been highlighted by the MeToo movement which has uncovered the extent of harassment in the workplace.  The Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Women and Equalities Select Committee have both called repeatedly for third-party harassment provisions to be reinstated in the EqA 2010 and a government consultation on whether new third-party harassment provisions should be introduced has just been completed so watch this space.’

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Bessong v Pennine Care NHS Trust UKEAT/0247/18/JOJ can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

194 Reviews

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 23 hours ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 4 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago