Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In today’s post we’re going to look at an issue which has received quite a lot of “air time” in the press recently – protected disclosures, confidentiality (or – as they’ve been termed – “gagging clauses”) and compromise agreements. We’ll have a brief look at the various issues involved, in particular by examining:

  1. What is a compromise agreement?
  2. What is a protected disclosure?
  3. Why all the fuss recently about protected disclosures and compromise agreements?
  4. Doesn’t s.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cover this?

What is a compromise agreement?

First off, a definition of a “compromise agreement”. A compromise agreement is a contract which is regulated by statute. This contract allows for the settling of Employment Tribunal proceedings and/or waiving the employee’s rights to make a claim to the Employment Tribunal in return for the receipt of some benefit to the employee. This benefit can be financial such as a sum of money) and/or non-financial (such as the promise to give an agreed reference to a future employer). There are specific rules regarding what constitutes a valid compromise agreement but we won’t cover these here.

What is a protected disclosure?

Under the ERA 1996 an employee has the right not to be dismissed or subjected to a detriment because they’ve made a protected disclosure. A “protected disclosure” is defined by s.43 of the Act – it is:

  • The disclosure of information which (in the reasonable belief of the worker) shows that one of the following has been, is being or is likely to be committed: a criminal offence, a failure to comply with a legal obligation, a miscarriage of justice, the endangering of the health or safety of any individual or the damaging of the environment;
  • Disclosed to the employer or some other responsible person, a lawyer or a Minister of the Crown; and
  • Made in good faith, with reasonable belief that the information is substantially true and is not for reasons connected to personal gain

Why all the fuss recently about protected disclosures and compromise agreements?

The recent media coverage of compromise agreements and “gagging orders” (more commonly referred to as confidentiality clauses) was spurred by Gary Walker (A former NHS Trust chief executive) breaking cover last week regarding a compromise agreement he had signed in April 2011 which stopped him from disclosing information relating to his employment with his employer’s consent. This, he stated, meant that he wasn’t allowed to disclose information to the media regarding potential malpractice at the NHS Trust that he worked for. Stephen Dorrell then weighed into the dispute, writing to Jeremy Hunt (current Health Secretary) that confidentiality clauses shouldn’t stop employees from highlighting patient safety concerns. Mr Hunt, in return, responded by confirming the same.

Doesn’t s.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 cover this?

In light of the above, it would be expected that there had been a legislative oversight regarding the potential for employers to stop employees making protected disclosures after a compromise agreement has been signed. But has there? S.43j of the Employment Rights Act 1996 would suggest not. Under s.43j:

(1) Any provision in an agreement to which this section applies is void in so far as it purports to preclude the worker from making a protected disclosure.

(2)This section applies to any agreement between a worker and his employer (whether a worker’s contract or not), including an agreement to refrain from instituting or continuing any proceedings under this Act or any proceedings for breach of contract.

There does not therefore seem to be any bar to a “worker” making a protected disclosure regarding their termination – any provision attempting to stop the worker doing so is void and unenforceable. The only unfortunate part of this is that “worker” isn’t defined under the Act – there’s some ambiguity as to whether an ex-employee can still be a “worker”. This would therefore mean that if an employee had signed a compromise agreement (that hadn’t resulted in the termination of their employment) and subsequently made a protected disclosure then their position would be protected. Again, the only sticking point is as to whether a former employee enjoys the same protection. Storm in a teacup, anyone?

Redmans Solicitors offer expert legal advice from employment law solicitors and settlement agreement solicitors.

logo_website

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 3 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 3 weeks ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago