Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Lofty v Hamis t/a First Café the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) held that a (“pre-cancerous”) form of cancer which was contained in skin layers and had not yet spread to other parts of the body constituted cancer for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010, and therefore a deemed disability.

The factual background of Lofty v Hamis t/a First Café

Ms Lofty worked as a cafe assistant. In or about summer of 2014 she became aware of a ‘blemish’ on her left cheek; after a biopsy in March 2015 the blemish was diagnosed as ‘lentigo maligna’ (a “pre-cancerous lesion which could result in lesion malignant melanoma (skin cancer)”). She underwent further surgery to remove the cancerous cells in April 2015 and subsequently 3 September 2015. This resulted her for being signed off work sick from 17 August 2015 for four weeks for “…surgery for Lentigo Maligna”. By mid-September 2015 she was informed that her latest biopsy was free of any form of possible cancer, but she continued to be signed off work until 17 December 2015 (for subsequent skin grafts and extreme anxiety).

Whilst Ms Lofty was signed off work sick it sought to undertake a review of her attendance. This led to her employment being terminated on 7 December 2015 due to her conduct in failing to attend meetings to discuss her continued absence from work.

Ms Lofty brought  claims to the Employment Tribunal for unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from disability (section 15 Equality Act 2010). For the purposes of the discrimination claim she contended that she had a deemed disability (cancer) and that she was therefore a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

Unfair dismissal

The Employment Tribunal held that Ms Lofty had been dismissed for a potentially fair reason but that her dismissal had been procedurally unfair – it therefore upheld her claim for unfair dismissal.

Disability discrimination

The Employment Tribunal considered evidence from Ms Lofty’s GP that her condition was a “pre-cancerous” condition and that ‘Lentigo Maligna’ is one of the earliest stages of a skin cancer called melanoma (with the cancer cells not having had the opportunity to spread anywhere else in the body).

The Employment Tribunal held that Ms Lofty’s condition did not amount to a disability as her condition was “pre-cancerous” and did not constitute cancer; she therefore did not have a ‘deemed disability’. The Tribunal went on to hold that her condition did not qualify as a disability for the purposes of section 6 Equality Act 2010.

Ms Lofty appealed against the decision of the Employment Tribunal in respect of its decision that she did not have cancer.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT held that the Tribunal had failed to properly analyse the medical evidence provided by Ms Lofty to the Employment Tribunal. The EAT held that on the evidence before it the Tribunal could have only come to one conclusion: that Ms Lofty had cancer and therefore a deemed disability (as it had been established that there were cancerous cells within Ms Lofty’s skin, albeit that they had not spread to other parts of Ms Lofty’s body yet).

The EAT upheld Ms Lofty’s appeal and substituted a finding that she had met the definition of having a condition deemed to be a disability for the purposes of section 6 of Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010.

Our solicitors’ comments on Lofty v Hamis t/a First Café

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case demonstrates that an Employment Tribunal should not generally engage in nuanced analysis of whether a cancerous, or pre-cancerous, condition, whether minor or major in nature, is a disability. Any form of cancerous condition will almost always constitute a deemed disability under the Equality Act 2010.”

The transcript of the EAT’s decision in Lofty v Hamis t/a First Café can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

199 Reviews

Paul T

Excellent, quick and informative. Chris was a real star and gave me confidence during the uncertainty if a redundancy settlement.

Posted 5 hours ago

Marina E

Felt in very capable hands was listened to and given excellent advice. Would not hesitate to recomend and use again if needed.

Posted 6 hours ago

Rosa B

Fabulous service all round.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Redmans were quick to respond to my enquiry and dealt with my case professionally and personably. I received sound advice and was put at ease by Chris Hadrill, Partner.

Posted 1 week ago

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 1 month ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Posted 2 months ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 2 months ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 2 months ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 2 months ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 2 months ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 2 months ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 2 months ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 2 months ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 2 months ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago