Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

A former magistrate brought two cases to the Court of Appeal recently, following espousal of views relating to same-sex marriage. The first of those (Page v Lord Chancellor &amp & Anor [2021] EWCA Civ 254) involved his removal from the magistracy by the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice.

The factual background

Richard Page had sat as a magistrate since 1999. He initially decided on criminal matters, but was in due course appointed to the family panel. Mr Page is a Christian; he interpreted those beliefs to mean that a same-sex couple should not be able to adopt a child as it was not in the child’s best interests. This was thrown into sharp focus when, at an unopposed adoption application, Mr Page communicated these views to the rest of the bench, refusing to sign the order which the court made.

Mr Page was found guilty of judicial misconduct, was reprimanded, and had to attend remedial training. However, this was not the end of the matter. A few months later, he gave interviews to a number of newspapers and appeared on BBC Breakfast talking about his reprimand. During the BBC interview, he said:

“My responsibility as a magistrate, as I saw it, was to do what I considered best for the child and my feeling was therefore that it would be better if it was a man and a woman who were the adopted parents.”

Following further discussion and panels, he was removed from office, having been once again found guilty of judicial misconduct.

The victimisation claim

Mr Page brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal, alleging that he had been subject to victimisation as a result of his speaking out about what he perceived to be discrimination based on his Christian beliefs. The relevant section of the Equality Act 2010 states that a person if subject to victimisation if she does a protected act, and is subject to a detriment because of that. The protected act claimed by Mr Page in this case was making an allegation that the Equality Act had been broken by reprimanding him. He claimed this was made during his BBC Breakfast interview.

As such, there were two consideration for the Tribunal:

  1. Whether Mr Page’s words had constituted an allegation of discrimination; and
  2. Whether the second round of disciplinary actions were because of that allegation.

The Tribunal decided to allow Mr Page to rely on the broadcast as a whole, rather than just his own words, to constitute the allegation he claimed to have made. However, despite this, they dismissed his claim

The appeal

Following an in-depth analysis of the Tribunal’s decision-making process, the Court of Appeal, through Underhill V-P’s leading judgment, concluded that Mr Page was not dismissed because he had complained about having been discriminatorily disciplined. The reason he had been dismissed was solely that he had made it clear that in the context of adoption he was not prepared to discharge his functions as a magistrate according to the law and the evidence (and had not acknowledged that his stance was mistaken).

In his supplement to Underhill V-P’s judgment, Jackson LJ gave a summation of the position of the court on magistrates who hold religious beliefs, which I reproduce in full as a matter of importance:

“Our system of justice owes a great debt to those who, like [Mr Page], give so much time and commitment when they sit as magistrates.  The fact that the magistracy contains individuals with differing backgrounds and beliefs is one of its strengths.  But once a private individual takes on a judicial role, he is subject to the same obligations as any other judge.  In this case [Mr Page] is not a victim.  He was not dismissed for complaining about his treatment but because he had shown himself incapable of honouring his undertaking, [..], to act as a magistrate in a way that was free from bias.”

Jackson LJ

Our lawyers’ views on the case of Page v Lord Chancellor &amp & Anor

Chris Hadrill, Partner in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that employees or officers (and, in particular, those holding public offices) will be expected to conduct themselves in a manner where, without large exception, they prioritise the requirement to undertake their roles professionally and impartially over any other extrinsic motivations.”

Link to judgment: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/254.html

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    312 Reviews

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 2 days ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 2 days ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Melanie M

    Very happy with the detailed advice provided from Redmans. They also helped me to secure a higher settlement than originally offered by my employer and were extremely diligent. I first spoke with Chris at relatively short notice and then Sacha dealt with my case. Would definitely recommend and use again in the future if needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans helped me with a work related issue, which was resolved quickly and professionally. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 month ago

    James F

    Great people, really friendly and professional helped with everything that I needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anusha S

    My case was handled by Sacha who was very thorough and helped me to achieve a good outcome with my employer. Sacha was very personal, professional and helped me during quite a stressful time, so I am hugely grateful to her and to Redmans. This was my first time engaging with a law firm so I wasn't sure what to expect but I can definitely say that it was a good experience overall and I ended up better off due to having the help of an experienced and proactive solicitor on my side.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Diane P

    So grateful that I contacted Redmans to deal with my Redundancy Agreement. Everything from the initial call to the completion of the matter was professional, efficient and effective. I was listened to, had everything explained simply and kept informed of every step. I received super advice and the costs were very competitive. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking similar help. First class service - thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Chris L

    It was a very efficient and effective service - Would recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Exceeded my expectations. Very professional and proactive. I highly recommend them.

    Posted 1 month ago