Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Two unions recently made applications in the High Court to attempt to stop Nexus, which operates the Tyne and Wear Metro, from bringing its claim against them, in Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive t/a Nexus v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers [2021] EWHC 1388 (Ch)

Factual background

The dispute related to an agreement made between the Claimant (Nexus) and the Defendants (the trade unions) regarding pay structure (the Letter Agreement). The Letter Agreement had been put under the microscope in previous proceedings (the Anderson proceedings), in which a group of employees to Nexus to the ET claiming underpayment. Their argument was that, according to the correct construction of the Letter Agreement, they were entitled to have their shift allowance calculated in reference to the pay as affected by the Letter Agreement. The ET agreed, as did the EAT, and the decision was finally upheld in the Court of Appeal.

The new proceedings

The Claimants brought a claim to rectify the Letter Agreement, which would essentially result in the shift allowance being calculated from the basic pay amount, rather than the adjusted Letter Agreement amount. The Defendants submitted that the Claimant should be estopped from doing so, and also applied for summary judgment.

Estoppel

The legal principles relevant to cause of action estoppel were laid out in Lord Sumption’s judgment in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46:

“Once a cause of action has been held to exist or not to exist, that outcome may not be challenged by either party in subsequent proceedings. This is “cause of action estoppel”.”

The Defendants argued that the Claimant was trying to challenge the outcome of the Anderson proceedings, and also that the Claimant should have raised the issue of mistake in those proceedings. The High Court disagreed with the Defendants, saying that the Anderson proceedings were concerned with the defendants’ members’ claims under their individual employment contracts as a matter of the construction of those contracts. The rectification claim was not concerned to challenge the Court of Appeal’s determination of the proper construction of those contracts, but that the contracts should be rectified because of common or unilateral mistake.

Summary judgment

The Defendants claimed that the new proceedings were an abuse of process, a legal principle which “precludes a party from raising in subsequent proceedings matters which were not, but could and should have been raised in the earlier ones”.

The defendants submitted that the rectification claim is an abuse of process on the ground that it amounts to a collateral attack on the Anderson judgment. The High Court, however, ruled that the rectification claim was not and could not have been made in the Anderson proceedings. The rectification claim did not involve a re-litigation of the construction of the Letter Agreement and did not constitute a collateral attack on the Anderson judgment.

The Defendants also made submissions that the Letter Agreement was not a legally binding contract, and therefore could not be rectified by the court. The High Court rejected this argument, too. Finally, the Defendants argued that the claim was unsustainable by reason of laches, which involves delay coupled with some form of relevant prejudice to the defendant. The Court ruled this argument was without merit.

Link to judgment: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2021/1388.html

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    320 Reviews

    Anonymous

    Efficient and quick service!

    Posted 2 days ago

    Karen B

    Quick response very helpful Issue raised dealt with very quickly

    Posted 5 days ago

    Carmen T

    Redmans give Great service and advice on reading contracts. They can explain all the solicitors jargon into words that you can understand. I received excellent service an I will use them again and again.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Very grateful for Mel’s efforts in handling my case from start to finish which I would have found very stressful without it. She was very professional, friendly and we had a positive outcome. Highly recommend.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Nalin W

    Mel Chin was my Legal Executive when I engaged the services of Redmans Solicitors to help with a redundancy matter. She was incredibly approachable and professional from start to finish. Specially I have to mention regarding prompt reply to all my email queries, It was super quick. I would thoroughly recommend Mel Chin. Many Thanks

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I'd highly recommend Redmans Solicitors. Mel was very helpful and assisted me throughout my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 1 month ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 months ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 2 months ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 2 months ago