Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Martin v Lancehawk Ltd (t/a European Telecom Solutions) UKEAT/0525/03/2203 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) upheld the decision of the Employment Tribunal that the dismissal of a female employee by her male boss after a sexual relationship between them ended was not direct sex discrimination.

The facts

Alexandra Martin commenced employment with Lancehawk Limited in April 2001. In July 2001 Mrs Martin, who was married at the time to man named ‘Steve’, began an affair with Mr Lovering, managing director of Lancehawk Limited (“Lancehawk”) and in a relationship with a woman named Gillian. The fact of the affair was known by other members of staff at Lancehawk.

By October 2002 some problems with the affair were starting to emerge and on 18 October 2002 Mrs Martin resolved that she should tell her husband Steve about the affair. She did so and Steve was upset. On 21 October 2002 Mrs Martin had a conversation with a colleague, Mrs Crookes in the Lancehawk kitchen, and informed Mrs Crookes that she had told Steve of the affair and that he was coming to the workplace that day to confront her about it. Mrs Crookes relayed this information to Mr Lovering, and Mr Lovering was upset as Mrs Martin had previously assured him she was not going to tell Steve of the affair. The affair came to an end on 21 October 2002 and Mrs Martin was dismissed shortly after on allegations that her actions had caused a breakdown in the trust and confidence that had previously existed between the parties (there were some allegations made that Mrs Martin had searched Mr Lovering’s desk and that she had threatened to cause harm to the business).

Mrs Martin brought claims to the Employment Tribunal of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and direct sex discrimination.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal found that the reason for Mrs Martin’s dismissal was because Mr Lovering thought that Mrs Martin had lied to him and because of the contents of the conversation that she had had with Mrs Crookes, and not for any other reason. The Tribunal found that Mrs Martin’s claim for unfair dismissal succeeded, principally because there had been no investigation carried out into the allegations of misconduct put to Mrs Martin.

The Tribunal, however, dismissed Mrs Martin’s claim for direct sex discrimination as it found that she had not been treated less favourably because of her gender.

Mrs Martin appealed the Tribunal’s finding on sex discrimination.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT rejected Mrs Martin’s appeal, holding that the Tribunal had properly applied the law on sex discrimination (under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975, at the time) as, principally, the correct comparator in the circumstances would have been a male employee with whom Mr Lovering had had a sexual relationship, and the Tribunal (nor the EAT) would have had any reason to believe that the male employee would have been treated more favourably in such circumstances. Equally, the EAT rejected Mrs Martin’s argument that the Tribunal should have applied a “but for” test (i.e. that, ‘but for’ the fact that Mrs Martin was a woman, she would not have been dismissed), holding that the correct test regarding causation was the ‘reason why’ an employee had been treated in a particular fashion.

Our comment on the case

This case is one of a number of cases (see our article earlier this week) that the EAT has had to rule on regarding the correct causation and comparator tests to be applied in cases of direct sex discrimination, and renders it difficult for employees to succeed with claims of direct sex discrimination if they have been dismissed because of the breakdown in a relationship with a colleague. However, depending on the circumstances the employee may be able to bring claims of sexual harassment, gender-related harassment and/or victimisation in the same circumstances.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

194 Reviews

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 23 hours ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 4 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago