Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

An order for disclosure is a fairly routine thing, or so one would be forgiven for thinking. However, when it comes to a disclosure order against a party or person outside of Great Britain, things get a little murkier. The Court of Appeal tried last year to make the waters a little clearer, in its hearing of an appeal covering this exact issue. The appeal was brought by a representative of Harvey Weinstein’s company, against whom a claim was issued in the Employment Tribunal (ET) by someone who says she was employed by the company. The Appellant is, and was at all material times, a resident and citizen of the United States.

The Rules

When looking at procedural issues, the first step is to consult the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (‘the Rules’). The relevant Rules are found at 29 and 31. Rule 29 deals with case management generally:

29. The Tribunal may at any stage of the proceedings, on its own initiative or on application, make a case management order. The particular powers identified in the following rules do not restrict that general power. […]

Rule 31 relates specifically to disclosure, and states:

31. The Tribunal may order any person in Great Britain to disclose documents or information to a party (by providing copies or otherwise) or to allow a party to inspect such material as might be ordered by a county court […]

The issue was whether the Tribunal was able to order disclosure from the Appellant, despite the Appellant’s apparent lack of nexus to Great Britain.

The varying decisions of the lower courts

Both the ET and the EAT decided that disclosure should be allowed, but for different reasons. In the ET, Employment Judge Tayler ruled that the answer to allowing disclosure was to be found in the second sentence of Rule 29: that none of the subsequent rules (including 31) could limit the general power of the Tribunal to make case management orders. As disclosure is a standard case management order, EJ Tayler reasoned, Rule 31 did not limit it.

In the EAT, Kerr J delivered the same result, but for a different reason. As he saw it, the power to make a disclosure order did come from Rule 31, but gave a strained and, to be blunt, acrobatic construction to the language of “in Great Britain” as meaning the location of the Tribunal, rather than the party.

The Court of Appeal

The same decision was reached in the Court of Appeal as in the two lower courts, but for yet another different reason. The Court of Appeal, it is clear from the judgment, wanted to cut out the judicial stretching which had had to happen below in order to reach the right conclusion. Lord Justice Underhill, giving the judgment of the Court, stated that he wanted to reach the conclusion by a “straightforward route”

This route was to explain that the power for disclosure did in fact come from Rule 29. Unlike EJ Tayler, however, Underhill LJ explained that Rule 31 simply did not apply to disclosure orders between parties, and was exclusively for orders against non-parties. As such, EJ Tayler’s judgment on Rule 31’s ability to limit Rule 29 did not apply, and nor did Kerr J’s judgment on whether Great Britain was in reference to the tribunal or the party.

The Court was keen to point out Rule 2, the overriding objective, to set parties on an equal footing. By allowing a party outside of Great Britain to avoid disclosure, no such equal footing could be said to be achieved.

Link to the judgment: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2021/26.html

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    312 Reviews

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 2 days ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 2 days ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Melanie M

    Very happy with the detailed advice provided from Redmans. They also helped me to secure a higher settlement than originally offered by my employer and were extremely diligent. I first spoke with Chris at relatively short notice and then Sacha dealt with my case. Would definitely recommend and use again in the future if needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans helped me with a work related issue, which was resolved quickly and professionally. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 month ago

    James F

    Great people, really friendly and professional helped with everything that I needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anusha S

    My case was handled by Sacha who was very thorough and helped me to achieve a good outcome with my employer. Sacha was very personal, professional and helped me during quite a stressful time, so I am hugely grateful to her and to Redmans. This was my first time engaging with a law firm so I wasn't sure what to expect but I can definitely say that it was a good experience overall and I ended up better off due to having the help of an experienced and proactive solicitor on my side.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Diane P

    So grateful that I contacted Redmans to deal with my Redundancy Agreement. Everything from the initial call to the completion of the matter was professional, efficient and effective. I was listened to, had everything explained simply and kept informed of every step. I received super advice and the costs were very competitive. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking similar help. First class service - thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Chris L

    It was a very efficient and effective service - Would recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Exceeded my expectations. Very professional and proactive. I highly recommend them.

    Posted 1 month ago