Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This post examines the objectives of employee who want to leave their current employer and set up a new business in the context of UK employment law and contract law. It mainly focuses on how employees can get into trouble and what steps they should take.

The employee’s objectives:

  1. Set up and run competing business
  2. Avoid being sued

If you want to leave your current job and set up a competing business there are a number of contractual and employment law issues which may involve you in litigation in the future. Therefore the first thing to do is check your contract of employment – what are the express terms of your contract? Particularly, are there any restrictive covenants which prohibit you from engaging in certain actions for a limited period of time after your contract of employment terminates? Common restrictive covenants are:

  • Non-compete clauses
  • Garden leave clauses
  • Non-solicitation clauses

Restrictive covenants are prima facie void as they are in restraint of trade. However, the courts recognise that employers have a right to protect their commercial interests when their employees leave, especially if the employees have been party to especially sensitive information or have been exposed to particular clients. An employer can therefore utilise common commercial law restrictive covenants if it can show that:

  • It has a legitimate proprietary interest that it is appropriate to protect; and
  • The protection sought is no more than is reasonable having regard to the interest of the parties and the public interest

Non-compete clauses seek to prevent employees from engaging in a particular trade or offering particular services that would compete with their former employer after the termination of their contract. It is generally deemed unreasonable for a non-compete clause to last for longer than 12 months post-termination. The non-compete clause may limit the prohibition of competition to a specific geographic area, such as the City of London. The less restrictive the non-compete clause, the more reasonable it will be likely to be (as is the case with all restrictive covenants) in commercial law terms.

Garden leave clauses seek to prevent employees from resuming employment immediately but forces the employee to serve out their notice period away from the office. This serves two potential purposes – it protects the commercial interests of the employer and it prevents a competitor from engaging the employee and using the information that the employee has. This serves to protect the employer’s information and its goodwill with its clients.

Non-solicitation clauses seek to prevent an employee from “soliciting” the clients of their former employer after they have left employment. Employees are therefore generally prevented from contacting clients that they had business dealings with at their previous employer in the (normally) 24 months prior to the termination of the contract of employment. The length of the non-solicitation period is normally up to 12 months but sometimes as little as 3 months.

As well as being subject to any express restrictive covenants in (or annexed to) the contract of employment, employees also have a number of implied duties towards their employer, such as the duty to maintain confidentiality relating to trade secrets. How the line is drawn between what is a trade secret and what has is normal commercial information can sometimes be difficult to draw but employees should be wary as to what information they divulge to any person after they leave employment – the watchword is always “less said soonest mended”.

Should you receive a letter from your previous employer asserting that you are in breach of contract (because, for example, you’re competing with your employer) you should seek specialist legal advice. It’s better to be prepared than risk being caught out when it comes to litigation. However, there is a big difference between receiving a pre-claim letter and actually having proceedings issued against you – in a lot of cases the matter never gets as far as litigation but is either settled or the employer loses interest in enforcing the contract.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

176 Reviews

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 3 days ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Got the job done swiftly without going too much in to detail.

Posted 1 week ago

Derek W

Redmans dealt with my case very efficiently and I was happy with the outcome.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Timely professional advice!

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very good service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was in contact with Chris and then worked with Caroline on an employment matter. I was very pleased with the service and professionalism throughout, and came away with satisfied with the outcome. Would happily recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Nikki

Received advice re employment law. Chris was very helpful and advised accordingly. Would happily recommend them and if ever I need help again, will not think twice before using them.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 months ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 months ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 months ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 months ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 2 months ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 2 months ago