Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

The facts in Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

Mr Leonard (“the Claimant”) was employed by the Scottish Prison Service (“the Respondent”) as a prison officer at Polmont Young Offenders’ Institution. On 7 June 2010 an incident occurred where an inmate was assaulted by another prison officer. The inmate complained of this prison officer’s conduct and the fact that although the Claimant had been situated in the hallway outside of the room where the assault occurred the Claimant had taken no steps to prevent the assault or report it. The Respondent conducted an investigation and concluded that although the Claimant’s behaviour was not pre-meditated it was sufficiently negligent to constitute gross misconduct. After a disciplinary hearing held on 1 February 2011 the Claimant was dismissed by letter on 16 February 2011.

The Claimant subsequently filed a complaint of unfair dismissal at the Employment Tribunal. The Employment Tribunal was held and its judgment registered on 22 February 2012. It concluded that the Respondent’s dismissal was because of the Claimant’s negligence in failing to undertake a series of required actions and was within the range of reasonable responses in the circumstances. Further, the fact that the Claimant had only been informed shortly prior to his disciplinary hearing of a number of the charges against him was not necessarily fatal to a finding of fair dismissal. The Claimant appealed on the grounds that the Respondent had erred in its application of Strouthos v London Underground Ltd, precedent for the principle that an employee should be given reasonable opportunity to respond to the charges against him (and that the employer should particularly not add in charges – especially those more serious in nature).

The law relating to gross misconduct, negligence and unfair dismissal

An employee with qualifying service has the right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996. To fairly dismiss an employee an employer must do two things:

  1. Make a decision to dismiss that is within the range of reasonable responses in the circumstances; and
  2. Conduct a fair procedure in deciding to dismiss the employee

If the employee’s conduct is sufficiently serious to breach their contract of employment then the employer may dismiss the employee for “gross misconduct”. If gross misconduct applies then the employer may terminate the contract of employment without notice. So, what can constitute gross misconduct? An act or a series of acts (if sufficiently serious) can be sufficient to justify a gross misconduct dismissal. Further, the conduct does not necessarily have to be an action on the part of the employee – it can equally be a failure to take a particular action. For example, if a nurse is supposed to undertake hourly rounds of her ward but falls asleep (and something happens to a patient in that time) then she has been negligent because of her failure to undertake a particular act. If this failure is particularly serious it can justify a finding of dismissal. However, as above, it must be sufficiently serious to justify dismissal and must be carried out in the correct manner.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

The Employment Appeal Tribunal rejected the Claimant’s appeal on the basis that it was misconceived. The EAT concluded that Strouthos v London Underground Ltd would apply if the reason for the dismissal was that the Claimant’s act was premeditated (as the Respondent had introduced fresh allegations of premeditation at a late date in the investigation). The Employment Tribunal had found that the actual reason for dismissal was the Claimant’s negligence, not the Claimant had acted in a premeditated fashion. The appeal was therefore misconceived and rejected.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on Leonard v Scottish Prison Service

This case shows that if Respondents conduct relatively thorough and fair investigations that it is difficult for Claimants to succeed in claims of unfair dismissal, even if there are elements of unfairness in the process.

Redmans are specialist employment solicitors based in Richmond, London.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

164 Reviews

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ricky D

Very satisfying to be assured of such attention and professionalism.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Excellent service - thankyou

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Efficient, timely and friendly support and advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ahmed S

They are always on hand when you need them and provide support even when its not necessary.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Nemen S

Wonderful experience.Chris was very responsive and provided an excellent service. A real professional who I would recommend to anyone

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Their guidance was clear and they provided me with all the information I required. Friendly yet professional

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris @ Redmans assisted me with an employment issue. Firstly, he was very proactive in coming back to my initial enquiry and then helped to clearly lay out the options that I had in relation to my position. He then assisted with the preparation of my case, which led to a very satisfactory outcome. I would highly recommend the quality of service & professionalism offered by Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Great service

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris was very effective and decisive in dealing with my matter. I felt guided, and the pressure to make decisions was taken off my shoulders; he knew what needed to be done and I was happy to follow his advice. The result of the legal dispute was a great success for me. He is also kind and personable. The only thing that I would say it could be improved, is the accuracy of cost estimation at the beginning: not many activites, that could not have been forseen had to take place, but costs went up more than double in the end. Overall very good and trustworthy. I would definately recommend and use Redmans services again.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 month ago