Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

This case in the Employment Appeal Tribunal concerns the application of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (“TUPE”) to a business transfer where the transferee (the acquiring company) hasn’t specified that TUPE applies to the transfer.

The facts in Gabriel v Peninsula Business Services Ltd & Anor

Ms Gabriel (“the Claimant”) commenced employment with Peninsula Business Services (“the First Respondent”) in March 2007. In January 2007 the First Respondent had purchased the shares of a company called Qudos Consulting Ltd and changed its name to QDOS Taxwise Ltd. In December 2007 the Claimant started working in the First Respondent’s Taxwise department. She remained employed with the First Respondent.

On 26 February 2009 the First Respondent notified its employees by email that were working in the Taxwise department that QDOS Taxwise Ltd had changed its name to Taxwise Services Ltd (“the Second Respondent”) and that from 1 April 2009 the trade and assets of the Taxwise business would transfer to the Second Respondent. The Claimant did not receive this email. She was therefore unaware that her employment had transferred. She remained on her existing terms and conditions and did not receive any notification that the identity of her employer had changed. However, her payslip did change to identify the Second Respondent as her employer and she received a P60 indicating that her employment had changed.

The Claimant argued at the Employment Tribunal that Peninsula had not argued that TUPE applied at the time of the transfer or afterwards. Her contract of employment could therefore not have automatically transferred to the Second Respondent. The Employment Tribunal rejected this argument and stated that TUPE did in fact apply and the Claimant had therefore transferred to the Second Respondent. The Claimant appealed on the grounds that:

–          Neither of the Respondents had stated that TUPE applied to the transfer of the Claimant’s contract of employment. In the absence of statutory guidance the position relied on was therefore that of common law – the House of Lords’ decision in Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Colleries Ltd (1940)

The law relating to the transfer of employment

If TUPE applies to the transfer of an employee’s contract of employment from a transferor business to a transferee business then under TUPE the transferee assumes all assets and liabilities of the transferring business. This includes the contract of employment of employees of the transferor. However, the transferor must inform its employees that TUPE applies to the transfer of their employment. If the transferor fails to do so then TUPE will not necessarily apply to the transfer and the employee’s contract of employment may not transfer automatically to the transferee.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s decision in Gabriel v Peninsula Business Services Ltd & Anor

The Employment Appeal Tribunal considered that TUPE did not apply in this instance. The fallback position was therefore to consider the binding decision of the House of Lords in Nokes v Doncaster Amalgamated Colleries Ltd. In Nokes the House of Lords considered that the contract of employment of an employee cannot be automatically transferred to another employer without his or her consent. The Claimant had not consented to the transfer and her employment therefore remained with Peninsula Business Services.

Our specialist employment lawyers’ thoughts on Gabriel v Peninsula Business Services Ltd & Anor

Our guidance for employers in this case would be:

  • In the appropriate circumstances make sure that you inform all employees subject to the transfer that the transfer of their employment will be subject to TUPE
  • Make sure that all employees have been informed. This is crucial. Failure to inform may mean that TUPE does not apply to that employee’s transfer.
  • To dot the I’s and cross the t’s make sure that employees either have a clause in their contract giving explicit consent to any potential transfer or make sure that all employees consent to the transfer

Our guidance for employees in this case would be:

  • Check your contract of employment to determine what your rights and obligations in the case of a TUPE transfer are
  • Carefully consider your position if you’re informed that you’re going to be subjected to a TUPE transfer. It is advisable to obtain specialist employment law advice.

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk


4.75 Average

195 Reviews

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 5 days ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago


Posted 1 month ago


I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago


Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago


Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago


I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago


efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 2 months ago


Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 2 months ago