Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Zakar v OCS Group UK Limited (ET/2416214/2018) the Employment Tribunal found that the failure to undertake a risk assessment, and subsequent termination of, a worker constituted discrimination.

The facts in Zakar v OCS Group UK Limited

Ms Zakar (the ‘Claimant’) obtained work at Manchester Airport working as a Customer Care Agent (‘CCA’) for OCS Group Limited (the ‘Respondent’) on a contract through an agency called Search Consultancy Limited.  Her role as a CCA involved looking after individuals who needed assistance on arrival at the airport because they had reduced mobility or a temporary impediment.  One of the personal characteristics listed in the job specification was ‘must be able to lift passengers in accordance with manual handling guidance’. The Claimant began work around 23 April 2018.  The role was initially for 8 weeks and she was told that normally she would be advised within those 8 weeks whether the Respondent wanted to keep her on as an permanent employee at the end of the contact.

On 20 May 2018 the Respondent was advised that the Claimant was pregnant and a risk assessment was undertaken.  The Claimant was assessed as being unable to continue in the CCA role and was transferred to work with the concierge team in order to be able to complete her shift. 

On her way home from work that day she received an e-mail from her agency which said that the Respondent had asked them to end her assignment with immediate effect.  The e-mail stated that this was because the outcome from the risk assessment was that she was unable to do her job and there were no other roles available.

The Claimant brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal (‘ET’) for pregnancy discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010.  She alleged that the Respondent had removed her from the CCA role because she was pregnant, had not transferred her to a concierge role and ended her contract because of her pregnancy.

The Respondent submitted that Schedule 22 of the of the Equality Act 2010 applied.  Schedule 22 offers a defence to a section 18 claim where it can be proven that an act is done for the purpose of protecting a pregnant worker.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The ET held that the Claimant had been discriminated against because she was pregnant.  They held that the Respondent had discriminated against the Claimant because of her pregnancy by removing her from the CCA role, not deeming the concierge role suitable and terminating her assignment.

The Respondent had failed to bring themselves within the provisions of Schedule 22 because they had not considered any alteration to the Claimant’s working conditions before dismissing her.  The ET held that implicit in the legislation designed to protect someone from a health and safety risk was the consideration of alternatives in term of tasks and/or full job roles.  It was clear from the Respondent’s evidence at the ET that they had completely failed to consider whether the CCA role could be changed to accommodate the Claimant’s pregnancy and/or whether a concierge role could have been made available to the Claimant rather than ending her contract.  Rather than dismissing the Claimant if the roles could not have been altered to accommodate her pregnancy, the Respondent should have afforded the Claimant leave until the risk to her and her babies health had ended.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms Zakar v OCS Group UK Limited

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case ‘The difficulty in this case for the Respondent was their complete failure to consider any flexibility in respect of the Claimant and her pregnancy and their having treated her differently to how they would have treated an actual employee in the same situation.  It therefore highlights the importance of understanding that agency workers are afforded the same protection as employees under discrimination legislation.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Ms Zakar v OCS Group UK Limited) (2416214/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

176 Reviews

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 days ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 3 days ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 3 days ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 4 days ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Got the job done swiftly without going too much in to detail.

Posted 1 week ago

Derek W

Redmans dealt with my case very efficiently and I was happy with the outcome.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Timely professional advice!

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very good service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was in contact with Chris and then worked with Caroline on an employment matter. I was very pleased with the service and professionalism throughout, and came away with satisfied with the outcome. Would happily recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Nikki

Received advice re employment law. Chris was very helpful and advised accordingly. Would happily recommend them and if ever I need help again, will not think twice before using them.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 months ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 months ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 months ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 months ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 2 months ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 2 months ago