Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Lewis v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd – ET3300540/2019 the Employment Tribunal held that the failure to investigate an allegation that one colleague had called another a “fucking disgusting wog” amounted to race-related harassment.

The facts in Lancelot Lewis v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd

Mr Lancelot Lewis (the “Claimant”) commenced employment with Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (“the Respondent”) on 14 March 2005 and had been a Grade 8 Signaller since October 2006, working at at Marston Vale Signal Centre since March 2015. The Claimant identified as Black British and relied on colour as the aspect of race to form his protected characteristic.  

On 24 July 2018 the Claimant was involved in a serious near-miss incident: the Claimant gave permission to a member of the public to cross the railway line when he ought not to have done as a train was approaching the crossing.  The member of the public had stopped when she saw the train go past and then contacted the signal box, advising the Claimant that a train has passed in front of her. The Claimant apologised to the member of the public for his error and allowed the member of the public to then cross safely.

The Respondent had in place a procedure whereby the Claimant should have reported ‘near-miss’ incidents to Operations Control and/or to his colleague by the end of his shift. He did not do so. The husband of the member of the public who had been wrongly instructed to cross the line by the Claimant contacted the Respondent to report the incident and make a formal complaint, and the Claimant was then removed from safety-critical duties (which is a standard procedure to avoid the risk of further such incidents).

A disciplinary hearing was arranged with the Claiamnt and took place on 20 May 2019. The Claimant did not dispute breaching the Respondent’s policies and procedures, but stated he was in shock and his failure to report the incident was out of character. His union representative also stated at that meeting that the Claimant was at the time working with a colleague (a Mr Cattini) who he did not trust, and against whom he had taken out a grievance previously. The Claimant suggested that this caused him to be hesitant to report the near-miss to his colleague, and further argued that he had been treated more severely than other signalling staff (quoting examples).

The Respondent issued the Claimant with a final written warning dated 5 June 2019, lasting 12 months – this was due to the seriousness of the incident, the potentially fatal consequences of it, and because signallers should reasonably be aware that incidents of such a kind should be reported.  The failure of the Claimant’s to notify Operations Control and his Local Operations Manager immediately had meant that no remedial action could be taken which could have involved protecting the Claimant’s own well being.

The Claimant appealed on three grounds. These were:

  1. On the interpretation of facts of the original hearing;
  2. The severity of the punishment; and
  3. His feeling that he had been treated unfairly due to race.

The Respondent was surprised at the reference to being treated unfairly due to his race as this had not been raised at the disciplinary hearing.

The Claimant’s appeal hearing took place on 16 October 2019 but the Respondent rejected the appeal, upholding the original decision. The Respondent did not take the Claimant’s relationship with Mr Cattini into consideration.

It subsequently transpired that another member of staff (Hayley Giles) had in a statement referred to a grievance against Mr Cattini, as well as to racist and derogatory comments Ms Giles stated that Mr Cattini had made (in particular, an allegation that Mr Cattini had stated to Ms Giles that the Claimant was a fucking disgusting wog.) The Claimant was made aware of Ms Giles’ statement in due course and on 19 November 2018 the Claimant raised a grievance.  He argued in his grievance that he had been treated differently in the way he had been disciplined to a number of other Signalling staff, and the use of racist language used by Mr Cattini about him (relying on Ms Giles’ statement containing the relevant words).

The Respondent undertook an investigation into the Claimant’s grievance but, for various reasons, failed to investigate the specific complaint that Mr Cattini had referred to the Claimant as a “fucking disgusting wog”.

The Claimant subsequently submitted a claim to the Employment Tribunal complaining that he had been subjected to direct race discrimination and race-related harassment.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal found that the following conduct amounted to race-related harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010:

  • That the Respondent failed to investigate the allegation that Mr Cattini described the Claimant as a “fucking disgusting wog”, when the issue was first raised by the Claimant; and
  • That the Respondent should have investigated the allegation rather Mr Cattini’s conduct when the grievance brought by the Claimant was investigated

The Employment Tribunal found that Mr Cattini had not in fact used the words alleged, but that the Respondent’s failure to deal with the Claimant’s complaint amounted to race-related harassment.

The other claims regarding different treatment in the way the disciplinary action was instigated when compared with comparators were not well founded were dismissed.

The Employment Judge did not deal with remedy in this particular judgment (it is expected that there will be a further hearing to determine remedy).

Our lawyers’ views on Lancelot Lewis v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd

Stephen Norton, a legal adviser at Redmans, commented on the case: “In this case the ET accepted the employers need to discipline the employee for failure to follow safety procedures and found no evidence of him facing different treatment from named comparators in this respect.  However, the failure not to investigate the allegations of racism where an employee has been the victim of alleged racist language or abuse as the ET stated raises the “justifiable expectation that his employer will investigate such matters with appropriate rigour.”

The liability judgment in the case of Lewis v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd – ET3300540/2019 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    330 Reviews

    Arabella B

    I am so grateful to Caroline Lewis at Redmans Solicitor’s for helping me with my Unfair Dismissal Case. I was seriously impressed how easy Redmans made the whole case, and am very happy with my Settlement. I have recommended your firm to at least 5 people in the last 3 months.. Thank you Caroline and everyone at Redmans. You are Brilliant .

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    Highly professional and efficient service.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Tanya T

    I had the pleasure of Chris and Sacha’s experience with a work matter. They made me feel at ease with the process and explained everything thoroughly. Would happily recommend Redmans especially Chris and use them if needed I’m the future. Thank you!

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    I used the services of Redmans solicitors and was a quick outstanding service I engaged them in a settlement agreement after been made redundant extremely professional at all that was done and would definetly use them again

    Posted 1 day ago

    Adrian A

    Spot on support, enough to get the matter at hand sorted. No beating around the bush, no nonsense - got the job done and we all moved on.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Mark Q

    Five Stars I was most impressed by the attention, courtesy, speed and above all, professionalism in dealing with my Settlement Agreement. I would certainly have no problem in recommending this firm to anyone in need of their services.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Ade A

    I was surprisingly impressed by how Redmans Solicitors handle my case. From the moment I call them to the absolute end of my case, they always look after my best interest.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Malcolm P

    they were there when others were not

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service all the way through from start to finish. Really great support and guidance from the team, they secured the offer that I wanted. I can't recommend Redmans highly enough and will be sure to use their services again should the need arise.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Efficient and quick service!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Karen B

    Quick response very helpful Issue raised dealt with very quickly

    Posted 1 month ago

    Carmen T

    Redmans give Great service and advice on reading contracts. They can explain all the solicitors jargon into words that you can understand. I received excellent service an I will use them again and again.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Very grateful for Mel’s efforts in handling my case from start to finish which I would have found very stressful without it. She was very professional, friendly and we had a positive outcome. Highly recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Nalin W

    Mel Chin was my Legal Executive when I engaged the services of Redmans Solicitors to help with a redundancy matter. She was incredibly approachable and professional from start to finish. Specially I have to mention regarding prompt reply to all my email queries, It was super quick. I would thoroughly recommend Mel Chin. Many Thanks

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I'd highly recommend Redmans Solicitors. Mel was very helpful and assisted me throughout my case.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 2 months ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 3 months ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 3 months ago