Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In today’s article we’re going to look at the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in F v Cleveland Policy Authority.

The facts in F v Cleveland Police Authority

The Claimant was employed by Cleveland Police Authority in February 2004 as a civilian worker. She was dismissed in February 2010 on allegations of misconduct.

She subsequently made a claim to the Employment Tribunal on the grounds of unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustment, and victimisation. A Pre-Hearing Review (“PHR”) was subsequently held before a full Employment Tribunal panel. The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s claims relating to disability discrimination on the basis that she had not provided sufficient medical evidence to the Tribunal (she had not provided medical notes as requested) and that the Tribunal doubted her credibility as a witness.

The Claimant appealed the decision of the Employment Tribunal and sought to adduce new evidence of her disability at the appeal.

The law

The law relating to proving disability discrimination

Under the Equality Act 2010 (and under the previous Disability Discrimination Act 1995, under which F v Cleveland Police Authority was pleaded) the Claimant must prove on the balance of probabilities that he or she is disabled, and is therefore entitled to claim under the various disability discrimination provisions (such as direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments etc.).

To prove on the balance of probabilities that they’re disabled, the Claimant must therefore show that:

  • he or she is mentally or physically impaired
  • their employer knew of their disability or that their disability is likely to be an advantage
  • the impairment affects the worker’s participation in professional life on a daily or frequent basis
  • the effect of the disability is substantial (more than trivial or that the worker has been medically advised not to carry out the work);
  • they could have carried out the work but for the impairment; and
  • the disability is long term (more than 12 months in duration or for the rest of the worker’s life)

The law relating to seeking to present new evidence at the appeal stage

Claimants can seek to adduce new evidence at the Employment Tribunal under the principle in Ladd v Marshall. This principles states that new evidence is adducible if:

  1. The evidence in question could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence on the behalf of the Claimant for use at an Employment Tribunal hearing; and
  2. The evidence is relevant and would have an important influence on the outcome of the hearing; and
  3. The evidence is credible

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the Claimant’s appeal under Ladd v Marshall principles (explained below). Although the Employment Appeal Tribunal noted the findings of the Employment Tribunal relating to the credibility of the Claimant, it considered the appeal well-founded. It found that:

  1. The Claimant was prevented from obtaining the necessary evidence because of the fault of her GP surgery and had been reasonably diligent in trying to obtain the information; and
  2. The evidence relating to her medical notes was relevant to determining whether the Claimant was disabled for the purpose of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995; and
  3. The medical notes were credible evidence

The case was therefore remitted to the Employment Tribunal.

Practical tips

  1. Make sure that you’ve got all evidence prepared for the Employment Tribunal
  2. If you can’t get all the necessary evidence, attempt to get the Hearing postponed – giving good reasons
  3. If you can’t get the Hearing postponed, make it clear to the Employment Tribunal that you’ve made reasonable attempts to get hold of the necessary evidence, that the evidence is important, and that the evidence is relevant

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.78 Average

143 Reviews

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Extremely efficient. Mel made a difficult situation bearable and gave good clear guidance thoughout.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Thanks Chris and Sacha I was reassured throughout the process and a happy outcome

Posted 2 weeks ago

Edward F

Good and clear employment advice

Posted 2 weeks ago

Richard O

Chris at Redmans is my go-to legal expert when it comes to employee-related matters. His depth of knowledge, experience and considered approach to problems and their solutions is highly valuable. I cannot recommend Redmans highly enough.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Rory Y

They provide me with timely and clear advice!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Steven C

Redmans handled my settlement with my employer quickly, decisively and to a standard that I was very happy with. I would in similar circumstances contract them again

Posted 3 weeks ago

Deepthi K

Transparent. Clear communication. Prompt reply’s. Saves lot of time. Very satisfied.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris and Sacha did a fantastic job and negotiated a significant better settlement agreement

Posted 3 weeks ago

Dino D

I did get a very swift and god service from Redmans

Posted 3 weeks ago

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 2 months ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 10 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 11 months ago