Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In today’s article we’re going to look at the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment in F v Cleveland Policy Authority.

The facts in F v Cleveland Police Authority

The Claimant was employed by Cleveland Police Authority in February 2004 as a civilian worker. She was dismissed in February 2010 on allegations of misconduct.

She subsequently made a claim to the Employment Tribunal on the grounds of unfair dismissal, direct disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustment, and victimisation. A Pre-Hearing Review (“PHR”) was subsequently held before a full Employment Tribunal panel. The Employment Tribunal dismissed the Claimant’s claims relating to disability discrimination on the basis that she had not provided sufficient medical evidence to the Tribunal (she had not provided medical notes as requested) and that the Tribunal doubted her credibility as a witness.

The Claimant appealed the decision of the Employment Tribunal and sought to adduce new evidence of her disability at the appeal.

The law

The law relating to proving disability discrimination

Under the Equality Act 2010 (and under the previous Disability Discrimination Act 1995, under which F v Cleveland Police Authority was pleaded) the Claimant must prove on the balance of probabilities that he or she is disabled, and is therefore entitled to claim under the various disability discrimination provisions (such as direct disability discrimination, indirect disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments etc.).

To prove on the balance of probabilities that they’re disabled, the Claimant must therefore show that:

  • he or she is mentally or physically impaired
  • their employer knew of their disability or that their disability is likely to be an advantage
  • the impairment affects the worker’s participation in professional life on a daily or frequent basis
  • the effect of the disability is substantial (more than trivial or that the worker has been medically advised not to carry out the work);
  • they could have carried out the work but for the impairment; and
  • the disability is long term (more than 12 months in duration or for the rest of the worker’s life)

The law relating to seeking to present new evidence at the appeal stage

Claimants can seek to adduce new evidence at the Employment Tribunal under the principle in Ladd v Marshall. This principles states that new evidence is adducible if:

  1. The evidence in question could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence on the behalf of the Claimant for use at an Employment Tribunal hearing; and
  2. The evidence is relevant and would have an important influence on the outcome of the hearing; and
  3. The evidence is credible

The Employment Appeal Tribunal’s judgment

The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the Claimant’s appeal under Ladd v Marshall principles (explained below). Although the Employment Appeal Tribunal noted the findings of the Employment Tribunal relating to the credibility of the Claimant, it considered the appeal well-founded. It found that:

  1. The Claimant was prevented from obtaining the necessary evidence because of the fault of her GP surgery and had been reasonably diligent in trying to obtain the information; and
  2. The evidence relating to her medical notes was relevant to determining whether the Claimant was disabled for the purpose of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995; and
  3. The medical notes were credible evidence

The case was therefore remitted to the Employment Tribunal.

Practical tips

  1. Make sure that you’ve got all evidence prepared for the Employment Tribunal
  2. If you can’t get all the necessary evidence, attempt to get the Hearing postponed – giving good reasons
  3. If you can’t get the Hearing postponed, make it clear to the Employment Tribunal that you’ve made reasonable attempts to get hold of the necessary evidence, that the evidence is important, and that the evidence is relevant

About Chris Hadrill

Chris is a specialist employment lawyer at Redmans. He specialises in contentious and non-contentious employment matters, including breach of contract claims, compromise agreements and Employment Tribunal cases. He writes on employment law matters on a variety of websites, including Direct 2 Lawyers, Lawontheweb.co.uk, LegalVoice, the Justice Gap and his own blog. Contact Chris by emailing him at chadrill@redmans.co.uk

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

172 Reviews

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 5 days ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 5 days ago

Anonymous

Got the job done swiftly without going too much in to detail.

Posted 6 days ago

Derek W

Redmans dealt with my case very efficiently and I was happy with the outcome.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Timely professional advice!

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very good service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was in contact with Chris and then worked with Caroline on an employment matter. I was very pleased with the service and professionalism throughout, and came away with satisfied with the outcome. Would happily recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Nikki

Received advice re employment law. Chris was very helpful and advised accordingly. Would happily recommend them and if ever I need help again, will not think twice before using them.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 months ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 months ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 months ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 months ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 2 months ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 2 months ago

Ricky D

Very satisfying to be assured of such attention and professionalism.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service - thankyou

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Efficient, timely and friendly support and advice

Posted 2 months ago