Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Lancaster and Duke Ltd v Wileman [2018] UKEAT 0256_17_040 the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) held that in situations where an employee is ‘guilty’ of gross misconduct the ‘Effective Date of Termination’ (“EDT”) should not be extended by the statutory minimum notice period (for the purposes of calculating the employee’s length of continuous service).

The factual background of Lancaster and Duke Ltd v Wileman

Ms Wileman commenced employment with Lancaster and Duke Ltd (“Lancaster”) on 22 September 2014. She was judged as being a capable worker, if occasionally rude and aggressive, and she had a combative relationship with one of Lancaster’s directors.

On 20 September 2016 Ms Wileman was summarily dismissed on allegations of gross misconduct – no process was carried out before the dismissal, the allegations put to her were vague, and she was not given a right of appeal against the decision. Ms Wileman subsequently submitted a claim for unfair dismissal to the Employment Tribunal.

The Employment Tribunal upheld Ms Wileman’s claim for unfair dismissal, holding, as a preliminary point, that under section 97(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (“ERA 1996”) where the employer dismisses an employee with less than the minimum required period of statutory notice the EDT is deemed to be the date on which the statutory period of notice would have expired. As at 20 September 2016 Ms Wileman would have been statutorily entitled to one weeks’ notice of termination, which would have expired on 27 September 2016. The Employment Tribunal therefore concluded that the correct EDT was 27 September 2016 and that Ms Wileman consequently had over two years’ continuous service, entitling her to bring a claim for unfair dismissal.

Lancaster appealed against the decision of the Employment Tribunal, arguing that section 86(6) ERA 1996 meant that, as Ms Wileman had been accused of gross misconduct, she was not therefore entitled to a period of statutory notice (and the EDT should therefore not be extended).

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

The EAT upheld Lancaster’s appeal, holding that section 86(6) ERA 1996 operated so as to eliminate an employee’s entitlement to statutory notice if they were ‘guilty’ of gross misconduct. The EAT held that the fact that the Employment Tribunal had not made a specific finding in its judgment as to whether Ms Wileman was guilty of gross misconduct as a matter of common law meant that his issue would have to be dealt with as a preliminary issue (in order to determine whether section 86(6) ERA 1996 was in fact engaged or not). This issue was therefore remitted to the Employment Tribunal.

Our solicitors’ comments on Lancaster & Duke Ltd v Wileman

Chris Hadrill, a specialist employment solicitor at Redmans, commented on the case: “This Employment Appeal Tribunal decision clarifies an important issue of law that had not been specifically dealt with before by the appeal courts. In cases where there is less than two years’ continuous employment and allegations of gross misconduct are made, employees should check to see what statutory period of notice they’re entitled to (in order to determine whether they can bring a claim for unfair dismissal or not)”.

The full decision of the EAT in Lancaster & Duke Ltd v Wileman [2018] UKEAT 0256_17_0407 can be found here

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.78 Average

138 Reviews

Richard O

Chris at Redmans is my go-to legal expert when it comes to employee-related matters. His depth of knowledge, experience and considered approach to problems and their solutions is highly valuable. I cannot recommend Redmans highly enough.

Posted 1 day ago

Rory Y

They provide me with timely and clear advice!

Posted 1 day ago

Steven C

Redmans handled my settlement with my employer quickly, decisively and to a standard that I was very happy with. I would in similar circumstances contract them again

Posted 1 day ago

Deepthi K

Transparent. Clear communication. Prompt reply’s. Saves lot of time. Very satisfied.

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

Chris and Sacha did a fantastic job and negotiated a significant better settlement agreement

Posted 1 day ago

Dino D

I did get a very swift and god service from Redmans

Posted 1 day ago

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 1 month ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 1 month ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 1 month ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 9 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 11 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 11 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 11 months ago