Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Miss C Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd (ET/1600412/2018) the Employment Tribunal upheld an employee’s claims for disability discrimination, constructive unfair dismissal, and victimisation after her employer failed to carry out the recommendations of an occupational health report.

The facts in Miss C Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd.

Miss C Robinson (the ‘Claimant’) was employed as an Information Advice and Assistance Worker by the Mind Monmouthshire (the ‘Respondent’) in its Abergavenny office until 7th December 2017.  She had also worked prior to this for the Respondent on a fixed term contract as a Community Outreach Worker from 23rd February 2016 which formed part of continuous employment.  The Claimant had a disability, Complex Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

In August 2016 the Claimant overheard and saw two managers and other members of staff imitating people with physical disabilities. The Claimant was upset, shocked and offended by what she heard.  She first raised her concerns over this behaviour in September 2016 at team meetings but did not want to raise a formal grievance/complaint due to her previous traumatic experience of pursuing a grievance working for a former employer.  She also raised a “protected disclosure” (also known as “whistleblowing”) regarding the incident. No attempt was made to resolve the issue and further similar incidents occurred involving offensive banter. 

The Claimant was successful in her application for the job role of Information, Advice and Assistance Worker and started her new post on 16 January 2017.  In March 2017 the Claimant started to develop symptoms of dissociation and suicidal thoughts and was referred for counselling. In April 2017 she was diagnosed with recurrent depressive disorder and on the 11th April she was prescribed antidepressant medication and diazepam. 

The Claimant was referred for an Occupational Health (OH) Assessment on 27th June 2017. The diagnosis provided by the OH Assessment was that the Claimant suffered from anxiety and depression, on top of a long-standing history of complex post-traumatic stress disorder. The Claimant stated that following her reporting of the mimicking incident in the summer of 2016 she felt that she had been “sent to Coventry” (meaning ostracised) by many of her colleagues; she stated she felt even more ostracised on return to the new role. The OH physician’s recommendations included that she be allowed to work in alternative work location or roles, that she be given a mentor to support her, and also that the Respondent should carry out a risk assessment for work-related stress.  The Respondent had actual knowledge of the Claimant’s disability from the OH Report.  The Respondent failed to carry out these recommendations.

The Claimant referred to the mimicking incident at a capability meeting she attended in July as well as a more recent incident of unacceptable behaviour involving staff laughing raucously and swearing in the background whilst she was trying to talk someone down from jumping.  She was advised to raise a grievance, which she was hesitant to do given her working environment and current state of health but submitted a grievance on 28 July 2017 as advised. The Claimant’s grievance complaint (regarding bullying and harassment she argued she was subjected to for raising her complaints) was not upheld, nor her appeal against the decision.  

On 30th November 2017 a friend and colleague contacting her after being concerned that the Respondent had made enquiries with her as a third party regarding the Claimant. This affected her trust in the Respondent and she resigned from her employment by issuing a letter on 1st December 2017 after a panic attack. She then presented a claim to the tribunal on 12th March 2018 for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination and whistleblowing (public interest disclosure detriment and dismissal).

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant was disabled, and that the Respondent knew of the Claimant’s disability from the date of the production of the OH report.

The Employment Tribunal found that the Respondent’s treatment of her in failing to escalate the harassment incident in August 2016 to its disciplinary procedure left her in a situation where she was obliged to work in an environment where there was frequent offensive ‘banter’ and language.  The Employment Tribunal upheld the Claimant’s complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and victimisation.

Failure to make reasonable adjustments

The Tribunal held that the Respondent had operated a PCP of requiring the Claimant to work alongside the staffed referred to as the ‘housing team’. The Tribunal further held that the Respondent had failed in its duty to make reasonable adjustments by failing to carry out the recommendations in the OH report (of exploring mediation and other ‘restorative solutions’) – it did “too little too late”.

Victimisation

The Employment Tribunal held that the Claimant’s complaint that she had witnessed members of staff mimicking a disabled person was a ‘protected disclosure’ (for the purposes of a whistleblowing claim) and a ‘protected act’ (for the purposes of a victimisation claim).

The Employment Tribunal held that there was an “inextricable relationship” between the complaint that the Claimant had made, the Respondent’s failure to deal with this complaint, and her resignation. The principal reason for the Claimant’s resignation was that she had made the protected disclosure and the Employment Tribunal therefore upheld the claims for automatic unfair dismissal and victimisation.

Constructive dismissal

The Employment Tribunal held that the Respondent’s conduct led to her resignation and that the chain of events that occurred since August 2016 amounted to a breach of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence.

The Employment Tribunal held that the case should be listed for a telephone preliminary hearing so that directions for a remedies hearing could be set. 

Our lawyers’ views on the case

This case is an interesting example of a catalogue of failures by an employer leading to a final incident acting as a ‘last straw’ leaving the employee little option but to resign. The decision to force the employee to go through the stress of a grievance procedure despite being aware of her disability, the failure to implement reasonable adjustments, as well as contacting third parties outside of the organisation to discuss her activities, all formed part of a chain of events that amounted to a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence she was owed as an employee.

The Employment Tribunal judgment in Miss C Robinson v Mind Monmouthshire Ltd (ET/1600412/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Contact us

    Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

    T: 020 3397 3603
    E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
    W: www.redmans.co.uk

    Testimonials

    4.78 Average

    265 Reviews

    Alison M

    Very happy with the advice I received

    Posted 13 hours ago

    Margaret A

    I found everything about the company to be extremely professional and efficient. During my initial contact with Chris, he listened well and was reassuring, so I felt confident that my case would be well handled. Caroline was excellent at explaining all the legal points and answering my questions, as well as being very supportive and understanding throughout the process. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 13 hours ago

    Sanja K

    Very efficient and professional service.

    Posted 14 hours ago

    Anonymous

    I found the advice I was given by Redmans Solicitors to be clear and useful and found the solicitor on my case to be both knowledgeable and approachable.

    Posted 5 days ago

    Karen T

    Great service. Thank you.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service from Chris & Mel Chin. The best outcome was achieved from the redundancy process. They were extremely thorough, listened carefully and acted swiftly on my behalf. I highly recommend Redmans Solicitors

    Posted 1 week ago

    Shanine M

    Excellent service, thank you so much!

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    I found Caroline and Chris very Helpful and provided excellent service. Caroline especially provided great legal advice and made me feel at ease with the whole process. I would highly recommend them. Thank you!

    Posted 1 week ago

    Gayle B

    Excellent company very professional would definitely recommend

    Posted 1 week ago

    Alex K

    Redmans provided an excellent service, timely and effective. Will definitely recommend.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Great job done on my employment law

    Posted 1 week ago

    Dominica S

    Caroline & Chris were very prompt and efficient.Very happy with the service and will definitely recommend Redmans Solicitor to everyone !

    Posted 1 week ago

    Sandra K

    If you are looking for a group of solicitors who are Professional, Caring and on point, then look no futher than Redmans. I was literally hand held through out my case. Can not find fault with this company, very happy with the result and the service i received. Would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    I found dealing with Redmans a pleasure. I got to speak to someone quickly, the advice was profferred promplty and the service was not 'pushy'. In addition, the administration was excellent. What more could you ask for?

    Posted 1 week ago

    ALISDAIR L

    Redmans did a brilliant job regarding my redundancy agreement. I miss read an extra charge which wasnt the case so doing a new review to clarify. I would recommend Redmans for any employment law issues you may have.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Christos G

    Great legal advice and quick correspondence. Very supportive and helpful through the entire process. Thank you Redmans!

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Chris Hadrill advised me on a redundancy settlement agreement. He was very responsive, easy to deal with and gave me good advice at a stressful time.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Zara M

    Rana at Redmans gave me support and confidence I needed to ensure a wrong, was put right. I couldn’t recommend enough.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Stuart T

    Chris provided an excellent service, he was efficient and friendly and I had no doubt when recommending him to my colleagues

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service, prompt responses. Chris Hadrill provided excellent and efficient service.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jane M

    Wonderful solicitors who really listen to you and who are there to offer expert legal advice but they also have a personal touch and you really feel supported both from a legal aspect but also from a personal aspect. They really listen .

    Posted 2 weeks ago