Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mackereth v (1) The Department for Work and Pensions (2) Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Ltd (ET/1304602/2018) an Employee’s discrimination claim’s failed in the Employment Tribunal when it held the right to manifest a religion or belief is subject to the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

The factual background in Mackereth v The Department for Work and Pensions & anor

Dr Mackereth (the ‘Claimant’) was a Christian.  The Claimant was recruited by Advanced Personnel Management Group (the ‘Second Respondent’) on 29 May 2018 to act as a Health and Disabilities Assessor for the Department for Work and Pensions (the ‘First Respondent’).  He was contracted to assess individuals on behalf of the First Respondent who were contemplating, undergoing or had undergone gender reassignment.

As part of his religious beliefs the Claimant did not believe that a person could change their gender at will.  He believed in the truth of the bible and, in particular, the truth of Genesis 1:27: ‘male and female He created them’.  He did not believe that “impersonating” the opposite sex could be beneficial to an individual’s welfare, or that society should accommodate and/or encourage anyone’s impersonation of the opposite sex.

As a result, he refused to refer to a client using the pronoun of their choice as required by the Second Respondent.  It was explained to him that this was a breach of the Second Respondent’s policy and would mean that he could not undertake customer-facing work, which was fundamental to his role.  The Claimant confirmed again that he would not be willing or able to comply with the Second Respondent’s policy and was consequently suspended and ultimately sacked. 

He brought various claims of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief in the Employment Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

There was no dispute in the ET that Christianity was a protected characteristic.  However, the Claimant attempted to argue that his beliefs were also protected as religious and/or philosophical beliefs under The Equality Act.  He argued that the pressure placed on him to renounce his belief, his suspension from work and summary dismissal were acts of harassment and less favourable treatment.

The Respondent’s argued that his particular beliefs in transgenderism were incompatible with human dignity and were in conflict with the fundamental human rights of transgender individuals and as a result were not protected as religious or philosophical beliefs under discrimination legislation.

The ET accepted that the Claimant did genuinely hold the religious beliefs he asserted (belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism) and that his right to hold those beliefs was protected. However, the right to manifest a religion or belief is subject to the protection of the rights and freedoms of others and the manner in which he chose to manifest those beliefs (refusing to refer to a transgender person by their chosen pronouns, titles or styles) would constitute unlawful discrimination or harassment under the Equality Act 2010.

The Claimant’s lack of belief that ‘impersonating the opposite sex’ might be beneficial for an individual’s welfare and/or that society should accommodate and/or encourage it, did not reach the necessary threshold for protection under employment law.

The ET also held that any person who refused to follow the policy would have been treated in the same way as Dr Mackereth.  Therefore, the treatment was not because of his beliefs and there was no less favourable treatment on religious grounds and no discrimination.  With regards to the Claimant’s claim of indirect discrimination, the ET held that even if the Second Respondent applied a provision, criteria or practice (‘PCP’) that put people with the Claimant’s beliefs at a disadvantage, the treatment would have been justified as a proportionate means of meeting the aim of promoting equality of opportunity.

Consequently, all of Dr Mackereth’s discrimination claims failed.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mr Mackereth v The Department for Work and Pensions & anor

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: ‘This case demonstrates the balancing act the Courts are required to do with regards to employee’ s rights to manifest their religion or belief whilst at the same time trying to protect the dignity of others.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr Mackereth v (1) The Department for Work and Pensions (2) Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Ltd (ET/1304602/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

124 Reviews

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 7 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service. It was a pleasure to work with Chris H, who is brilliant at what he does and very efficient. Their Senior Associate Rana T. is also very knowledgeable and resolves any queries speedily and efficiently. My issue could unfortunately not be resolved, but that was due to my employer and not the firm. Redmans however did all they could. I would definitely recommend them.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Very pleasant and quick to deal with. Mnay thanks.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Easy to get hold of. Quick.

Posted 9 months ago

Owen J

Very helpful, efficient service.

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

I am very lucky that I worked with Mr. Chris Hadrill and he managed my case very progressively with an analytical approach and trustfully. Of course with a very positive result. I strongly recommend Mr. Hadrill to any one seeking for a successful result from a highly qualified solicitor.

Posted 9 months ago

Kulbir S

Amazing, quick friendly service from Chris from the start and Caroline. They made me feel at ease during a difficult time, they understood and advised accordingly and I am really happy with the outcome of my case. Will always advise anyone who needs legal advice to contact Redmans, I’m so glad that I did and can confidently say I don’t think any other firm could have handled my case any better. Well done guys, wish you all the best and please keep doing what your doing, simply the best!

Posted 9 months ago

Mark A

Excellent service - rapid and “to the point” advice given to ensure meeting the target time frame

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Chris Hadrill kept me sane during the negotiations with my employer. He was courteous professional and he cared about doing the best he could for me. I will use Redmans again if ever I need an employment solicitor. Excellent service.

Posted 9 months ago

Muhammad Z

Awesome services. Professionals at their best .

Posted 9 months ago

Anonymous

Thanks for the advice and for negotiating a good outcome. Good to have the support at a very stressful time

Posted 9 months ago

Chloe F

My solicitor at Redmans was very helpful and efficient. Really pleased with the smooth service.

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Chris was absolutely excellent. Clear and concise, offering sound advice.

Posted 10 months ago

Tim O

Experienced and competent advisors

Posted 10 months ago

Rachel A

Quick and expert assistance. I would highly recommend Chris for any of your legal needs.

Posted 10 months ago

Joe S

I was very happy with the service provided by Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. I felt very comfortable discussing all matters with Chris and am very grateful for all the help and guidance I was given throughout the whole process. I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to friends and family!

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

I had a very good experience working with Chris Hadrill during a difficult and emotional time. This held true from the moment I spoke to him on the phone, to the end of the process. Overall, he was attentive, professional and highly supportive. He provided sound advice and clarity. It was the reviews that led me to Redmans! I was very happy to know they were all true. I highly recommend working with Redmans Solicitors. Thank-you to the entire team!

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Good service

Posted 10 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent professional service. Highly recommend.

Posted 10 months ago

Rob O

Very prompt response and I could not fault the service. My solicitor listened carefully to the details of my case and I felt very confident in the advice I was offered. All emails and work done on my behalf with my former employer was of the highest standard and Redmans helped take a lot of the stress out of the situation for me.

Posted 10 months ago