Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mackereth v (1) The Department for Work and Pensions (2) Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Ltd (ET/1304602/2018) an Employee’s discrimination claim’s failed in the Employment Tribunal when it held the right to manifest a religion or belief is subject to the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

The factual background in Mackereth v The Department for Work and Pensions & anor

Dr Mackereth (the ‘Claimant’) was a Christian.  The Claimant was recruited by Advanced Personnel Management Group (the ‘Second Respondent’) on 29 May 2018 to act as a Health and Disabilities Assessor for the Department for Work and Pensions (the ‘First Respondent’).  He was contracted to assess individuals on behalf of the First Respondent who were contemplating, undergoing or had undergone gender reassignment.

As part of his religious beliefs the Claimant did not believe that a person could change their gender at will.  He believed in the truth of the bible and, in particular, the truth of Genesis 1:27: ‘male and female He created them’.  He did not believe that “impersonating” the opposite sex could be beneficial to an individual’s welfare, or that society should accommodate and/or encourage anyone’s impersonation of the opposite sex.

As a result, he refused to refer to a client using the pronoun of their choice as required by the Second Respondent.  It was explained to him that this was a breach of the Second Respondent’s policy and would mean that he could not undertake customer-facing work, which was fundamental to his role.  The Claimant confirmed again that he would not be willing or able to comply with the Second Respondent’s policy and was consequently suspended and ultimately sacked. 

He brought various claims of discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief in the Employment Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

There was no dispute in the ET that Christianity was a protected characteristic.  However, the Claimant attempted to argue that his beliefs were also protected as religious and/or philosophical beliefs under The Equality Act.  He argued that the pressure placed on him to renounce his belief, his suspension from work and summary dismissal were acts of harassment and less favourable treatment.

The Respondent’s argued that his particular beliefs in transgenderism were incompatible with human dignity and were in conflict with the fundamental human rights of transgender individuals and as a result were not protected as religious or philosophical beliefs under discrimination legislation.

The ET accepted that the Claimant did genuinely hold the religious beliefs he asserted (belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism) and that his right to hold those beliefs was protected. However, the right to manifest a religion or belief is subject to the protection of the rights and freedoms of others and the manner in which he chose to manifest those beliefs (refusing to refer to a transgender person by their chosen pronouns, titles or styles) would constitute unlawful discrimination or harassment under the Equality Act 2010.

The Claimant’s lack of belief that ‘impersonating the opposite sex’ might be beneficial for an individual’s welfare and/or that society should accommodate and/or encourage it, did not reach the necessary threshold for protection under employment law.

The ET also held that any person who refused to follow the policy would have been treated in the same way as Dr Mackereth.  Therefore, the treatment was not because of his beliefs and there was no less favourable treatment on religious grounds and no discrimination.  With regards to the Claimant’s claim of indirect discrimination, the ET held that even if the Second Respondent applied a provision, criteria or practice (‘PCP’) that put people with the Claimant’s beliefs at a disadvantage, the treatment would have been justified as a proportionate means of meeting the aim of promoting equality of opportunity.

Consequently, all of Dr Mackereth’s discrimination claims failed.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mr Mackereth v The Department for Work and Pensions & anor

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: ‘This case demonstrates the balancing act the Courts are required to do with regards to employee’ s rights to manifest their religion or belief whilst at the same time trying to protect the dignity of others.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mr Mackereth v (1) The Department for Work and Pensions (2) Advanced Personnel Management Group (UK) Ltd (ET/1304602/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

164 Reviews

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ricky D

Very satisfying to be assured of such attention and professionalism.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Excellent service - thankyou

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Efficient, timely and friendly support and advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ahmed S

They are always on hand when you need them and provide support even when its not necessary.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Nemen S

Wonderful experience.Chris was very responsive and provided an excellent service. A real professional who I would recommend to anyone

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Their guidance was clear and they provided me with all the information I required. Friendly yet professional

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris @ Redmans assisted me with an employment issue. Firstly, he was very proactive in coming back to my initial enquiry and then helped to clearly lay out the options that I had in relation to my position. He then assisted with the preparation of my case, which led to a very satisfactory outcome. I would highly recommend the quality of service & professionalism offered by Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Great service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris was very effective and decisive in dealing with my matter. I felt guided, and the pressure to make decisions was taken off my shoulders; he knew what needed to be done and I was happy to follow his advice. The result of the legal dispute was a great success for me. He is also kind and personable. The only thing that I would say it could be improved, is the accuracy of cost estimation at the beginning: not many activites, that could not have been forseen had to take place, but costs went up more than double in the end. Overall very good and trustworthy. I would definately recommend and use Redmans services again.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 month ago