Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others: 2423941/2017, the Employment Tribunal held that a member of bar staff was dismissed because of her pregnancy, rather than because she was redundant or because she had engaged in misconduct.

The facts in Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others

Ms Barnes started working at Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd t/a The Wiend Bar (“the Bar”) in November 2015 as assistant manager. Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas were two of the four directors of the Bar and the majority shareholders, each having a 45% shareholding; Mr Douglas also assumed personal responsibility for the lease of the Bar premises and funded the refurbishment costs.

The Bar was originally projected to turn over up to £11,000 per week, but was only achieving approx £6,000 per week instead. As time went on Mr Douglas and Mr Clayton decided to cut costs, cancelling the Sky subscription and ordering staff to keep a close eye on costs.

In May 2016 an employee was dismissed as ‘redundant’ because a customer made a complaint about her.

By March 2017 Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas were considering making Ms Barnes redundant in order to improve profitability; however, Mr Clayton persuaded Mr Douglas that they should not make Ms Barnes redundant – this was in part because Mr Clayton was due to get married shortly, and he wished for Ms Barnes to cover his shifts at the Bar whilst he was on honeymoon.

In May 2017 the Bar employed two new staff on a part-time basis.

On 20 June 2017 Ms Barnes sent Mr Clayton a message with a picture of a positive pregnancy test. She also sent a message jokingly asking what she should do next given the fact that she was pregnant. Mr Clayton replied “laughing” and he then messaged her “gonna push you downstairs”.

On 25 June 2017 Mr Clayton informed Mr Douglas of Ms Barnes’ pregnancy.

On 29 June 2017 Mr Douglas was asked by a third party whether the Bar would be closing soon, as they had attended the Bar recently and there had not been much stock on show. On 30 June 2018 Mr Douglas attended the Bar and found that there was very little stock on the premises. He spoke to Mr Clayton who blamed Ms Barnes for the lack of stock, as she had allegedly overslept and missed a delivery.

On 6 July 2017 Mr Douglas had a telephone conversation with Ms Barnes – in this conversation he informed her that he believed that she was to blame for the lock of stock at the Bar; he also informed her that the Bar was in financial difficulties and that they could not afford to pay her any more.

On 10 July 2017 Mr Douglas sent Ms Barnes a letter confirming that she was being dismissed for various reasons, including that the business was in financial difficulties and that he felt that she was responsible for the lack of stock.

On 26 October 2017 the Bar went into creditors’ voluntary liquidation.

Ms Barnes subsequently made claims in the Employment Tribunal, alleging:

  • That Mr Clayton’s texts on 20 June 2017 constituted unfavourable treatment because she was pregnant;
  • That Mr Douglas’ conduct on 6 July 2017 constituted unfavourable treatment because she was pregnant; and
  • That she had been dismissed because she was pregnant

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Employment Tribunal held that the conduct of Mr Clayton and Mr Douglas on, respectively, 20 June 2017 and 6 July 2017 did not constitute pregnancy discrimination – Mr Clayton’s conduct on 20 June 2017 was, the Tribunal found, part of a joke with Ms Barnes and was not serious, and it found that Mr Douglas’ conduct on 6 July 2017 constituted part of his act to dismiss her and therefore not a separate act to that of the dismissal.

The Employment Tribunal did find, however, that the reason for Ms Barnes’ dismissal was because of her pregnancy, and therefore found her dismissal to be an act of discrimination and automatically unfair. The Tribunal found that Ms Barnes would not have been dismissed at the beginning of July 2017 and that there was a significant causal connection between the timing of her announcement of her pregnancy and her dismissal; there was not a redundancy situation that existed at any time and Mr Douglas also, the Tribunal found, acted ‘in haste’ once he was told that Ms Barnes was pregnant.

The Employment Tribunal ordered a remedy hearing be held on a separate date.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others

Chris Hadrill, the partner in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “Once employers are aware that an employee is pregnant they should take great care to ensure that any action taken against the pregnant employee is reasoned, justified, and fair, otherwise they may face a claim of pregnancy discrimination as in this case – act in haste, repent at leisure.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Ms K Barnes v Douglas Leisure (North West) Ltd T/a The Wiend Bar (in Liquidation) and others: 2423941/2017 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

195 Reviews

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 5 days ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Posted 1 month ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 2 months ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 2 months ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 2 months ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 2 months ago