Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Giles v Geach and Jones t/a Cornelia Care Homes (ET/3100720/05) the Employment Tribunal held that Ms Giles’ employer had discriminated against her by imposing a requirement that she must work 25 hours per week in the office, awarding her almost £30,000 in compensation.

The facts in Giles v Geach and Jones t/a Cornelia Care Homes

Ms Giles worked for Cornelia Care Homes as a payroll clerk. She had young children and, at the commencement of her employment, worked 16 hours per week so that she could deal with her childcare responsibilities as well as her professional commitments. However, after a change to her duties she began working an additional 16 hours per week overtime, the bulk of the overtime work being undertaken from home.

In January 2005 Mr Geach approached Ms Giles and informed her that he wanted her to work full-time (35 hours per week) in the office from April 2005. Mr Geach gave no explanation as to why there needed to be a change in the working arrangements and there was no consultation on the proposed changes.

Ms Giles informed Mr Geach that she could work full-time if she was allowed to work part-time in the office and the rest of the time at home. The organisation did not reply to this request and Ms Giles subsequently handed in her notice of termination.

After Ms Giles handed in her notice of termination Cornelia Care Homes informed her that it could reduce the number of hours that she would have to work in the office to 25 hours per week, but that she must be in the office for that period of time each week. Ms Giles replied that she had previously been able to deal with queries herself by telephone or using her computer, and that she did not see why it was necessary to work 25 hours per week in the office. She submitted a flexible working request that she work 16 hours per week in the office, with the remainder to be worked at home, but this was rejected.

Ms Giles then sent a detailed grievance to the organisation complaining about the change in requirements and the lack of flexibility that the organisation was showing, but she received no response to this.

Ms Giles subsequently brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal for indirect sex discrimination.

The law relating to indirect sex discrimination

Under section 19 Equality Act 2010 indirect discrimination occurs if:

  • A policy, criterion or provision (“PCP”) is applied to B;
  • which is applied to persons with whom B does not share a protected characteristic; and
  • which puts persons with whom B shares the protected characteristic at a particular disadvantage as compared to persons who do not possess the protected characteristic; and
  • puts, or would put, B at that disadvantage; and
  • A cannot show that the PCP is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Employment Tribunal upheld Ms Giles’ claim for indirect sex discrimination, holding:

  • That Cornelia Care Homes had imposed a PCP that she could only retain her position if she worked 25 hours full-time in the office in a job-share and no less than 25 hours per week;
  • That Ms Giles had therefore been subjected to indirect sex discrimination; and
  • That the organisation’s defence of ‘objective justification’ was not successful as there was not a legitimate aim in imposing the requirement and the means used to achieve the aim were not proportionate

The Employment Tribunal awarded the Claimant £29,294.19 in compensation, comprised of:

  • Injury to feelings: £5,000;
  • Compensation for loss of earnings: £14,495.85;
  • Increase of 40% to reflect serious breach of statutory grievance procedure: £7,798.34; and
  • Aggravated damages: £2,000

Our solicitors’ views on Giles v Geach and Jones t/a Cornelia Care Homes

Chris Hadrill, specialist employment solicitor in the employment team at Redmans, commented on the case: “This case shows that employers should think carefully before imposing any form of requirement that employees must conform to particular requirements, as this could potentially result in a successful discrimination claim being brought in the Employment Tribunal (as was the case with this claim.”

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.80 Average

    320 Reviews

    Anonymous

    Efficient and quick service!

    Posted 2 days ago

    Karen B

    Quick response very helpful Issue raised dealt with very quickly

    Posted 5 days ago

    Carmen T

    Redmans give Great service and advice on reading contracts. They can explain all the solicitors jargon into words that you can understand. I received excellent service an I will use them again and again.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Very grateful for Mel’s efforts in handling my case from start to finish which I would have found very stressful without it. She was very professional, friendly and we had a positive outcome. Highly recommend.

    Posted 4 weeks ago

    Nalin W

    Mel Chin was my Legal Executive when I engaged the services of Redmans Solicitors to help with a redundancy matter. She was incredibly approachable and professional from start to finish. Specially I have to mention regarding prompt reply to all my email queries, It was super quick. I would thoroughly recommend Mel Chin. Many Thanks

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I'd highly recommend Redmans Solicitors. Mel was very helpful and assisted me throughout my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 1 month ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 2 months ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 2 months ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 2 months ago