Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (1600788/2019) the Employment Tribunal held that the dismissing employer had had a ‘closed mind’ as to whether there was any option other than dismissal, and therefore upheld the employee’s Employment Tribunal claim for unfair dismissal.

The facts of the case

Mrs Lovelady (the ‘Claimant’) was a beauty therapist and hairdresser who worked for Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (the ‘Respondent’).  She was employed from 23 March 2016 and had a period of maternity leave from February 2018 to 6 November 2018.

The Respondent was a sole trader and small employer.  She did not have any formal policies and procedures in place to deal with things like disciplinaries.  Two of the Claimant’s colleagues made it known to the Respondent that they found the Claimant to be intimidating, unfairly critical and reported that she ‘was offensive in her tone and attitude’.  At least two costumers also complained about her inappropriate conversations which ‘mainly consisted of vulgar toilet talk and discussions of a sexual nature’.

The Respondent spoke to the Claimant on at least three occasions informally about her behaviour towards her colleagues and what was considered to be inappropriate behaviour in front of customers, however there was no formal or informal warnings issued.

Upon returning from maternity leave the Claimant was upset about a reduction in her hours.  A work colleague of the Claimant’s complained that she was exerting pressure on them to reduce their hours so she could do more.  Things came to a head when the Respondent went on holiday for a week.  One of the Claimant’s colleagues sent a WhatsApp message to the Respondent complaining about the Claimant’s behaviour saying she had been ‘a bit of a bully this week’.  The Respondent replied to say she was ‘not pleased’ and that she was upset with the Claimant about her behaviour.

Upon her return the Respondent met with the Claimant on 11 February 2019 and then wrote to her advising her that she would be suspended pending an investigation into gross misconduct.  She then sent the Claimant the results of the investigation on 15 February 2019 and invited her to a meeting on 18 February.  In that letter the Respondent failed to give the Claimant dates of the alleged incidents, exact words spoken, or the conduct complained of. The letter stated at the end that ‘a decision as to whether there is reason to continue to disciplinary proceedings will be made after the meeting’.

The Respondent investigated the allegations and interviewed staff.  Her husband was present at the interviews.  A meeting was held on the 18th February, but again the Claimant was not provided with any evidence or substantive details as to the allegations she was facing and at the end of the meeting was advised that the Respondent and her husband would now decide whether or not she was to be dismissed.  The Claimant was shocked about this as she had not understood that her job was at risk.

The Respondent wrote to the Claimant on 19 February 2019 advising her that she was being summarily dismissed because of the allegations.  She was advised of her right to appeal and the Claimant did appeal, but late.  The Respondent was also the appeal’s officer and refused to accept the Claimant’s late appeal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The ET held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed.  They found that the Respondent had already made up her mind about the Claimant and the allegations as evidenced by the WhatsApp message she sent, and this was unfair to the Claimant.  She also failed to follow a fair, transparent and objective disciplinary procedure. She was in effect the investigation officer, dismissing officer and appeals officer.  She did not give any consideration to the appointment of an outsider or third-party investigator or disciplinary hearing chairperson.   Whilst the summary dismissal of an employee who was bullying and intimidating colleagues was potentially within the band of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer, here the Respondent has simply taken sides and reached a conclusion without a thorough and fair investigation, consideration of any defence or mitigating circumstances.  She had also failed consider options short of summary dismissal.

The ET went on to limit the Claimant’s award to four weeks which they considered to be the period it would have taken to dismiss the Claimant fairly.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: ‘This case demonstrates the difficulty small businesses can have in following a fair dismissal procedure where the business is owner operated.  The importance of taking proper legal advice and considering alternative options such as outsourcing investigations or appeals cannot be underestimated.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (1600788/2019) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Contact us

    Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

    T: 020 3397 3603
    E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
    W: www.redmans.co.uk

    Testimonials

    4.78 Average

    265 Reviews

    Alison M

    Very happy with the advice I received

    Posted 1 day ago

    Margaret A

    I found everything about the company to be extremely professional and efficient. During my initial contact with Chris, he listened well and was reassuring, so I felt confident that my case would be well handled. Caroline was excellent at explaining all the legal points and answering my questions, as well as being very supportive and understanding throughout the process. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Sanja K

    Very efficient and professional service.

    Posted 1 day ago

    Anonymous

    I found the advice I was given by Redmans Solicitors to be clear and useful and found the solicitor on my case to be both knowledgeable and approachable.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Karen T

    Great service. Thank you.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service from Chris & Mel Chin. The best outcome was achieved from the redundancy process. They were extremely thorough, listened carefully and acted swiftly on my behalf. I highly recommend Redmans Solicitors

    Posted 1 week ago

    Shanine M

    Excellent service, thank you so much!

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    I found Caroline and Chris very Helpful and provided excellent service. Caroline especially provided great legal advice and made me feel at ease with the whole process. I would highly recommend them. Thank you!

    Posted 1 week ago

    Gayle B

    Excellent company very professional would definitely recommend

    Posted 1 week ago

    Alex K

    Redmans provided an excellent service, timely and effective. Will definitely recommend.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    Great job done on my employment law

    Posted 1 week ago

    Dominica S

    Caroline & Chris were very prompt and efficient.Very happy with the service and will definitely recommend Redmans Solicitor to everyone !

    Posted 1 week ago

    Sandra K

    If you are looking for a group of solicitors who are Professional, Caring and on point, then look no futher than Redmans. I was literally hand held through out my case. Can not find fault with this company, very happy with the result and the service i received. Would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Anonymous

    I found dealing with Redmans a pleasure. I got to speak to someone quickly, the advice was profferred promplty and the service was not 'pushy'. In addition, the administration was excellent. What more could you ask for?

    Posted 1 week ago

    ALISDAIR L

    Redmans did a brilliant job regarding my redundancy agreement. I miss read an extra charge which wasnt the case so doing a new review to clarify. I would recommend Redmans for any employment law issues you may have.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Christos G

    Great legal advice and quick correspondence. Very supportive and helpful through the entire process. Thank you Redmans!

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Chris Hadrill advised me on a redundancy settlement agreement. He was very responsive, easy to deal with and gave me good advice at a stressful time.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Zara M

    Rana at Redmans gave me support and confidence I needed to ensure a wrong, was put right. I couldn’t recommend enough.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Stuart T

    Chris provided an excellent service, he was efficient and friendly and I had no doubt when recommending him to my colleagues

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Anonymous

    Excellent service, prompt responses. Chris Hadrill provided excellent and efficient service.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jane M

    Wonderful solicitors who really listen to you and who are there to offer expert legal advice but they also have a personal touch and you really feel supported both from a legal aspect but also from a personal aspect. They really listen .

    Posted 2 weeks ago