Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (1600788/2019) the Employment Tribunal held that the dismissing employer had had a ‘closed mind’ as to whether there was any option other than dismissal, and therefore upheld the employee’s Employment Tribunal claim for unfair dismissal.

The facts of the case

Mrs Lovelady (the ‘Claimant’) was a beauty therapist and hairdresser who worked for Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (the ‘Respondent’).  She was employed from 23 March 2016 and had a period of maternity leave from February 2018 to 6 November 2018.

The Respondent was a sole trader and small employer.  She did not have any formal policies and procedures in place to deal with things like disciplinaries.  Two of the Claimant’s colleagues made it known to the Respondent that they found the Claimant to be intimidating, unfairly critical and reported that she ‘was offensive in her tone and attitude’.  At least two costumers also complained about her inappropriate conversations which ‘mainly consisted of vulgar toilet talk and discussions of a sexual nature’.

The Respondent spoke to the Claimant on at least three occasions informally about her behaviour towards her colleagues and what was considered to be inappropriate behaviour in front of customers, however there was no formal or informal warnings issued.

Upon returning from maternity leave the Claimant was upset about a reduction in her hours.  A work colleague of the Claimant’s complained that she was exerting pressure on them to reduce their hours so she could do more.  Things came to a head when the Respondent went on holiday for a week.  One of the Claimant’s colleagues sent a WhatsApp message to the Respondent complaining about the Claimant’s behaviour saying she had been ‘a bit of a bully this week’.  The Respondent replied to say she was ‘not pleased’ and that she was upset with the Claimant about her behaviour.

Upon her return the Respondent met with the Claimant on 11 February 2019 and then wrote to her advising her that she would be suspended pending an investigation into gross misconduct.  She then sent the Claimant the results of the investigation on 15 February 2019 and invited her to a meeting on 18 February.  In that letter the Respondent failed to give the Claimant dates of the alleged incidents, exact words spoken, or the conduct complained of. The letter stated at the end that ‘a decision as to whether there is reason to continue to disciplinary proceedings will be made after the meeting’.

The Respondent investigated the allegations and interviewed staff.  Her husband was present at the interviews.  A meeting was held on the 18th February, but again the Claimant was not provided with any evidence or substantive details as to the allegations she was facing and at the end of the meeting was advised that the Respondent and her husband would now decide whether or not she was to be dismissed.  The Claimant was shocked about this as she had not understood that her job was at risk.

The Respondent wrote to the Claimant on 19 February 2019 advising her that she was being summarily dismissed because of the allegations.  She was advised of her right to appeal and the Claimant did appeal, but late.  The Respondent was also the appeal’s officer and refused to accept the Claimant’s late appeal.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The ET held that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed.  They found that the Respondent had already made up her mind about the Claimant and the allegations as evidenced by the WhatsApp message she sent, and this was unfair to the Claimant.  She also failed to follow a fair, transparent and objective disciplinary procedure. She was in effect the investigation officer, dismissing officer and appeals officer.  She did not give any consideration to the appointment of an outsider or third-party investigator or disciplinary hearing chairperson.   Whilst the summary dismissal of an employee who was bullying and intimidating colleagues was potentially within the band of reasonable responses of a reasonable employer, here the Respondent has simply taken sides and reached a conclusion without a thorough and fair investigation, consideration of any defence or mitigating circumstances.  She had also failed consider options short of summary dismissal.

The ET went on to limit the Claimant’s award to four weeks which they considered to be the period it would have taken to dismiss the Claimant fairly.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: ‘This case demonstrates the difficulty small businesses can have in following a fair dismissal procedure where the business is owner operated.  The importance of taking proper legal advice and considering alternative options such as outsourcing investigations or appeals cannot be underestimated.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs Lovelady v Mrs Fowler trading as Daniel James (1600788/2019) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

194 Reviews

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 23 hours ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 4 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 1 month ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 1 month ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 1 month ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 1 month ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 1 month ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 1 month ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 1 month ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 1 month ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 1 month ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago