Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (ET/3200248/2019) the Employment Tribunal upheld an employee’s claim that she had been discriminated against after she was subjected to undue criticism and then dismissed subsequent to notifying her employer of the fact of her pregnancy.

The facts in Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited

Ms Jachacz (the ‘Claimant’) worked for Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (the ‘Respondent’) from 22 August 2018 making egg free cakes.  She found out she was pregnant in September 2018 and was advised by her work colleagues to tell a Mr Lenain who managed her which she did by way of a text message on 15 September.  Mr Lenain advised Mrs Wright, the owner of the Respondent, no later than 19 September 2018.

Within 5 days of discovering the Claimant was pregnant, Mrs Wright organised a probation review meeting with the Claimant without any prior notification.  She told the Claimant that she was not happy with the Claimant using her mobile phone at work, eating leftover sponge cake pieces and licking cream off her hands.  The Claimant apologised but stated that colleagues did the same.  At the end of the meeting she asked, ‘do I have my job still?’ and Mrs Wright answered ‘yes. You can go back to your task.  Meeting completed.  I will inform about my decision after the meeting notes have been reviewed’.  The meeting lasted no longer than 15 minutes.  The Claimant was visibly pregnant at the meeting. At no point during the course of the meeting did Mrs Wright indicate to the Claimant that she would lose or might lose her job.

Subsequent to that meeting Mrs Wright went on holiday and there was no contact between her and the Claimant until the Claimant was dismissed on the 12 October by way of a letter which stated that Mrs Wright was writing to confirm her decision following the meeting. It went on to state that that the Claimant had failed to follow the Respondent’s rules and procedures and failed to achieve performance targets.

The Claimant appealed the decision to dismiss her, but was not notified of the time of the appeal meeting so it went ahead in her absence.  The Claimant’s appeal was not upheld.

The Claimant brought a claim for discrimination on the basis that she was dismissed because of her pregnancy.

The law

Section 18 2 (A) of the Equality Act 2010 states that ‘A person (A) discriminates against a woman if, in the protected period in relation to a pregnancy of hers, A treats her unfavourably (a) because of her pregnancy.’

Subsection (2) does not apply if A can show that they did not contravene the provision.  A Claimant must establish on the balance of probabilities facts from which the ET ‘could in the absence of an adequate explanation’ find that the Respondent had discriminated.  This means that there must be a ‘prima facie case’ of discrimination, including less favourable treatment, than a comparator (actual or hypothetical) with circumstances materially the same as the Claimants and facts from which the ET can infer that the less favourable treatment was because of the protected characteristic.  If the Claimant is able to establish this, the Respondent must prove that the less favourable treatment was in no sense whatsoever because of the protected characteristic.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The ET upheld the Claimant’s claim that her dismissal constituted discrimination because of her pregnancy contrary to S18 of the Equality Act 2010.

They did not accept that the reasons given for the Claimant’s dismissal in the letter of 12 October were honest and accurate in light of the fact that Mrs Wright had been away for most of the time in between the meeting and the Claimant’s dismissal and as such was not in a position to monitor any improvement in the Claimant’s performance.  In addition, they noted that no performance targets had ever been set.  The Claimant had successfully established a prima facie case of discrimination and the onus had shifted to the Respondent to establish that on the balance of probabilities that the dismissal of the Claimant involved no discrimination at all.  As the ET did not accept the reasons provided for the Claimant’s dismissal they held that the reason for it was in fact her pregnancy. 

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case ‘This case demonstrates the importance of employers who make a decision to dismiss following a thorough and fair process, regardless of the employees length of service, so as to ensure they did not get caught out by employment legislation.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Ms Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (ET/3200248/2019) can be found here.


Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Contact us

    Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

    T: 020 3397 3603
    E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
    W: www.redmans.co.uk


    4.78 Average

    262 Reviews


    I found the advice I was given by Redmans Solicitors to be clear and useful and found the solicitor on my case to be both knowledgeable and approachable.

    Posted 2 days ago

    Karen T

    Great service. Thank you.

    Posted 3 days ago


    Excellent service from Chris & Mel Chin. The best outcome was achieved from the redundancy process. They were extremely thorough, listened carefully and acted swiftly on my behalf. I highly recommend Redmans Solicitors

    Posted 4 days ago

    Shanine M

    Excellent service, thank you so much!

    Posted 5 days ago


    I found Caroline and Chris very Helpful and provided excellent service. Caroline especially provided great legal advice and made me feel at ease with the whole process. I would highly recommend them. Thank you!

    Posted 6 days ago

    Gayle B

    Excellent company very professional would definitely recommend

    Posted 1 week ago

    Alex K

    Redmans provided an excellent service, timely and effective. Will definitely recommend.

    Posted 1 week ago


    Great job done on my employment law

    Posted 1 week ago

    Dominica S

    Caroline & Chris were very prompt and efficient.Very happy with the service and will definitely recommend Redmans Solicitor to everyone !

    Posted 1 week ago

    Sandra K

    If you are looking for a group of solicitors who are Professional, Caring and on point, then look no futher than Redmans. I was literally hand held through out my case. Can not find fault with this company, very happy with the result and the service i received. Would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 1 week ago


    I found dealing with Redmans a pleasure. I got to speak to someone quickly, the advice was profferred promplty and the service was not 'pushy'. In addition, the administration was excellent. What more could you ask for?

    Posted 1 week ago


    Redmans did a brilliant job regarding my redundancy agreement. I miss read an extra charge which wasnt the case so doing a new review to clarify. I would recommend Redmans for any employment law issues you may have.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Christos G

    Great legal advice and quick correspondence. Very supportive and helpful through the entire process. Thank you Redmans!

    Posted 1 week ago


    Chris Hadrill advised me on a redundancy settlement agreement. He was very responsive, easy to deal with and gave me good advice at a stressful time.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Zara M

    Rana at Redmans gave me support and confidence I needed to ensure a wrong, was put right. I couldn’t recommend enough.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Stuart T

    Chris provided an excellent service, he was efficient and friendly and I had no doubt when recommending him to my colleagues

    Posted 2 weeks ago


    Excellent service, prompt responses. Chris Hadrill provided excellent and efficient service.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jane M

    Wonderful solicitors who really listen to you and who are there to offer expert legal advice but they also have a personal touch and you really feel supported both from a legal aspect but also from a personal aspect. They really listen .

    Posted 2 weeks ago


    They dealt with my case professional and swiftly. The advise was helpful and enabled me to make the right decisions in my case.

    Posted 2 weeks ago


    I have received a great legal advice from Redmans on a very short notice. I’d highly recommend them.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Michael D

    Excellent, efficient advice - the whole matter was concluded with minimum fuss and an excellent outcome.

    Posted 2 weeks ago