Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (ET/3200248/2019) the Employment Tribunal upheld an employee’s claim that she had been discriminated against after she was subjected to undue criticism and then dismissed subsequent to notifying her employer of the fact of her pregnancy.

The facts in Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited

Ms Jachacz (the ‘Claimant’) worked for Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (the ‘Respondent’) from 22 August 2018 making egg free cakes.  She found out she was pregnant in September 2018 and was advised by her work colleagues to tell a Mr Lenain who managed her which she did by way of a text message on 15 September.  Mr Lenain advised Mrs Wright, the owner of the Respondent, no later than 19 September 2018.

Within 5 days of discovering the Claimant was pregnant, Mrs Wright organised a probation review meeting with the Claimant without any prior notification.  She told the Claimant that she was not happy with the Claimant using her mobile phone at work, eating leftover sponge cake pieces and licking cream off her hands.  The Claimant apologised but stated that colleagues did the same.  At the end of the meeting she asked, ‘do I have my job still?’ and Mrs Wright answered ‘yes. You can go back to your task.  Meeting completed.  I will inform about my decision after the meeting notes have been reviewed’.  The meeting lasted no longer than 15 minutes.  The Claimant was visibly pregnant at the meeting. At no point during the course of the meeting did Mrs Wright indicate to the Claimant that she would lose or might lose her job.

Subsequent to that meeting Mrs Wright went on holiday and there was no contact between her and the Claimant until the Claimant was dismissed on the 12 October by way of a letter which stated that Mrs Wright was writing to confirm her decision following the meeting. It went on to state that that the Claimant had failed to follow the Respondent’s rules and procedures and failed to achieve performance targets.

The Claimant appealed the decision to dismiss her, but was not notified of the time of the appeal meeting so it went ahead in her absence.  The Claimant’s appeal was not upheld.

The Claimant brought a claim for discrimination on the basis that she was dismissed because of her pregnancy.

The law

Section 18 2 (A) of the Equality Act 2010 states that ‘A person (A) discriminates against a woman if, in the protected period in relation to a pregnancy of hers, A treats her unfavourably (a) because of her pregnancy.’

Subsection (2) does not apply if A can show that they did not contravene the provision.  A Claimant must establish on the balance of probabilities facts from which the ET ‘could in the absence of an adequate explanation’ find that the Respondent had discriminated.  This means that there must be a ‘prima facie case’ of discrimination, including less favourable treatment, than a comparator (actual or hypothetical) with circumstances materially the same as the Claimants and facts from which the ET can infer that the less favourable treatment was because of the protected characteristic.  If the Claimant is able to establish this, the Respondent must prove that the less favourable treatment was in no sense whatsoever because of the protected characteristic.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The ET upheld the Claimant’s claim that her dismissal constituted discrimination because of her pregnancy contrary to S18 of the Equality Act 2010.

They did not accept that the reasons given for the Claimant’s dismissal in the letter of 12 October were honest and accurate in light of the fact that Mrs Wright had been away for most of the time in between the meeting and the Claimant’s dismissal and as such was not in a position to monitor any improvement in the Claimant’s performance.  In addition, they noted that no performance targets had ever been set.  The Claimant had successfully established a prima facie case of discrimination and the onus had shifted to the Respondent to establish that on the balance of probabilities that the dismissal of the Claimant involved no discrimination at all.  As the ET did not accept the reasons provided for the Claimant’s dismissal they held that the reason for it was in fact her pregnancy. 

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms Prewett v Green King Services Limited

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case ‘This case demonstrates the importance of employers who make a decision to dismiss following a thorough and fair process, regardless of the employees length of service, so as to ensure they did not get caught out by employment legislation.’

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Ms Jachacz v Eggfree Cake Box Walthamstow Limited (ET/3200248/2019) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name

Your last name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.75 Average

193 Reviews

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Posted 2 weeks ago

submit

I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Marie D

very good service all digitalised

Posted 3 weeks ago

Philip H

Chris Hadrill handled my case with great accuracy and efficiency. Basically made it feel like a process without hassle. Doesn't try to expand the case just for greater fees. I value his professional advice highly.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Michael W

Professional, responsive and supportive - excellent service!

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was really happy with the service provided. I had to chase a couple of time but despite that, my matter was dealt with in a timely manor. I would use again in the future

Posted 4 weeks ago

Lee M

Superb service and always available

Posted 4 weeks ago

Jonathan S

I was very grateful for the support I received from Redmans during a very difficult period. Rana Tandon really got under the skin of my issue and understood what was important to me, steering me carefully and sensibly to an outcome I was very happy with. I would recommend Redmans to anyone else without any reservations whatsoever.

Posted 1 month ago

Mohamed A

Super helpful and efficient, trustworthy service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 1 month ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 month ago