Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited (ET/3201703/2018), the Employment Tribunal upheld the Claimant’s claims for maternity leave discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal after her employer delayed increasing her pay and giving her a new contract until she returned from maternity leave.

The facts in Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited

Mr Amin (the ‘Claimant’) was a nursery nurse.  She worked for Calvary Pre-School Limited, (the ‘Respondent’) from 23 February 2015 as an apprentice but employed under a contract of employment. Ms Bailey was the manager of the nursery for the Respondent.

In early 2017 Ms Bailey told the Claimant that when she completed her apprenticeship, she would be given a new contract of employment and an increased salary.  In or around June 2017 the Claimant informed the Respondent that she was pregnant.  She then completed her apprenticeship course on 28 June 2017.  The Claimant immediately informed the Respondent that she had completed her course and asked to be given her new contract of employment with the increased rate of pay.  The Respondent informed the Claimant that they would not be able to provide either until she provided evidence of having completed the course.  The Respondent received an e-mail from the course assessor confirming that the Claimant had completed the course, but despite this the Claimant was informed that no changes would be made until a copy of the actual certificate were provided.

As a result, the Claimant worked from 29 June to 9 November 2017 (when she went on maternity leave), under her apprenticeship contract, even though her apprenticeship had finished on 28 June 2017. The Claimant finally received the certificate on 4 September 2017 and e-mailed it to Ms Bailey.  At the same time, she gave notice of her intention to go on maternity leave from 10 November 2017 to 25 June 2018.  The Claimant again asked for a pay rise and to be put on a new contract and the Respondent again refused.  Ms Bailey advised the Claimant that numbers in the nursery were down and that they could not afford to employ the Claimant on new terms until she returned from maternity leave

The Claimant was dissatisfied with this decision and on 14 September 2017 Ms Bailey wrote to the Claimant offering her a new contract from the date she returned from maternity leave, despite the fact that the Claimant still had two months before she was due to go on maternity leave.  Then at a meeting on 15 September 2017 to discuss the Claimant’s complaints, Ms Bailey said words to the effect of ‘your brain does not function properly because you are pregnant.

The Claimant took maternity leave and returned to work on 28 June 2018.  The Respondent had failed to apply for a DBS for the Claimant and so she was unable to work the last few days in June and into July and then the nursery was closed for the summer.  The Claimant was given a new contract with increased pay, which was signed on 13 July 2018, but for the month of July the Respondent paid the Claimant holiday pay calculated using a SMP rate based on the old contract.

Upon the Claimant’s return to work in September 2018 the Claimant resigned.  In her resignation letter she referred to having been discriminated against because she was pregnant and had taken maternity leave and her belief that all of the issues regarding pay and the change of contract would have been dealt with more smoothly and efficiently had she not done so.

The Claimant went on to make claims in the ET for pregnancy and maternity discrimination, constructive unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Claimant’s claims succeeded.  The ET held that, on the balance of probabilities, there were no financial difficulties which could justify not putting the Claimant on a new contract until she returned form maternity leave.  They further held that the Respondent took advantage of the fact that the Claimant was going on maternity leave to save money by delaying the start of her permanent contract until after she returned and that this was an act of unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy and maternity discrimination. They also held that the remarks made by Ms Bailey constituted unfavourable treatment because of the pregnancy.

With regards to the Claimant’s holiday pay, the Respondent was unable to provide any justification as to why the Claimant had been paid at the SMP rate for July and August and held that they had done so to save the business money.  The ET also upheld that Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages from the point at which the new contract superseded the old contract (13 July 2018) as she was underpaid from that time.

Finally, the Claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal succeeded as the Claimant’s continued failure to pay the Claimant the sums due under the 2018 contract was a repudiatory breach of contract which entitled the Claimant to resign.

The Employment Tribunal listed a remedy hearing to take place on 5 November 2019.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “This case is a clear example of an employer treating an employee differently from the moment she announces her pregnancy and attempting to use the employee’s maternity leave to their financial advantage. A pregnant employee’s right to avail themselves of maternity leave and not suffer a detriment as a result is enshrined in law employers should make sure they have a solid understanding of a pregnant employee’s rights so as to not fall foul of the law.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited (ET/3201703/2018) can be found here.


Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your first name (required)

Your last name (required)

Your email (required)

Your telephone number (required)

Brief details of your enquiry

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk


4.77 Average

205 Reviews

Gary P

All good advice, prompt and efficient

Posted 6 hours ago


Excellent advice and customer service.

Posted 1 month ago

Aneet G

I would definitely recommend Redmans. Very impressed with service provided. They were extremely proactive in handling my case which made things easier for me. Provided sound advice and resolution. Special credit for this goes to Chris who dealt with my case with great determination and consideration.

Posted 1 month ago

Fern M

Very efficient and friendly

Posted 1 month ago

Neville S

A professional and friendly service, which I would highly recommend.

Posted 1 month ago

Daniel T

Extremely helpful and made a bad situation much more manageable. Where other solicitors seemed disinterested in my situation Redmans immediately made me feel like it was a team effort to achieve a more favourable outcome

Posted 1 month ago

Paul T

Excellent, quick and informative. Chris was a real star and gave me confidence during the uncertainty if a redundancy settlement.

Posted 1 month ago

Marina E

Felt in very capable hands was listened to and given excellent advice. Would not hesitate to recomend and use again if needed.

Posted 1 month ago

Rosa B

Fabulous service all round.

Posted 1 month ago


Redmans were quick to respond to my enquiry and dealt with my case professionally and personably. I received sound advice and was put at ease by Chris Hadrill, Partner.

Posted 1 month ago

Alkhas K

Excellent service.

Posted 1 month ago

Mathias G

Contacted them regarding my end of employment agreement. Chris Hadrill dealt with it and was done and handed back to employer same day more than happy with there service.

Posted 2 months ago

Mark W

Most professional from start to finish offering very a personal service. Most impressive and quick when dealing with the matters in hand.

Posted 3 months ago


Posted 3 months ago


I am very glad I came across Redmans Solicitors. Fantastic service!

Posted 3 months ago


Fantastic communication, always happy to answer queries, highly recommended.

Posted 3 months ago

Wavenie B

They were very straight to the point, friendly and understanding people. I felt they had my best interest. They were easy to get hold of, replies were almost instant. 5/5 for customer service

Posted 3 months ago

Christina P

Caroline was fantastic to work with - extremely knowledgeable, supportive, thorough and honest. I definitely recommend Redmans!

Posted 3 months ago


Very well done and fast support. Professional and reliable. Highly recommended!

Posted 3 months ago

Helene L

They were very knowledgable in the respected area in terms of change in law/regulations that is crucial for the clients who are seeking for legal arvice.

Posted 3 months ago

Sara R

Very helpful and wonderful advice

Posted 3 months ago