Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited (ET/3201703/2018), the Employment Tribunal upheld the Claimant’s claims for maternity leave discrimination and constructive unfair dismissal after her employer delayed increasing her pay and giving her a new contract until she returned from maternity leave.

The facts in Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited

Mr Amin (the ‘Claimant’) was a nursery nurse.  She worked for Calvary Pre-School Limited, (the ‘Respondent’) from 23 February 2015 as an apprentice but employed under a contract of employment. Ms Bailey was the manager of the nursery for the Respondent.

In early 2017 Ms Bailey told the Claimant that when she completed her apprenticeship, she would be given a new contract of employment and an increased salary.  In or around June 2017 the Claimant informed the Respondent that she was pregnant.  She then completed her apprenticeship course on 28 June 2017.  The Claimant immediately informed the Respondent that she had completed her course and asked to be given her new contract of employment with the increased rate of pay.  The Respondent informed the Claimant that they would not be able to provide either until she provided evidence of having completed the course.  The Respondent received an e-mail from the course assessor confirming that the Claimant had completed the course, but despite this the Claimant was informed that no changes would be made until a copy of the actual certificate were provided.

As a result, the Claimant worked from 29 June to 9 November 2017 (when she went on maternity leave), under her apprenticeship contract, even though her apprenticeship had finished on 28 June 2017. The Claimant finally received the certificate on 4 September 2017 and e-mailed it to Ms Bailey.  At the same time, she gave notice of her intention to go on maternity leave from 10 November 2017 to 25 June 2018.  The Claimant again asked for a pay rise and to be put on a new contract and the Respondent again refused.  Ms Bailey advised the Claimant that numbers in the nursery were down and that they could not afford to employ the Claimant on new terms until she returned from maternity leave

The Claimant was dissatisfied with this decision and on 14 September 2017 Ms Bailey wrote to the Claimant offering her a new contract from the date she returned from maternity leave, despite the fact that the Claimant still had two months before she was due to go on maternity leave.  Then at a meeting on 15 September 2017 to discuss the Claimant’s complaints, Ms Bailey said words to the effect of ‘your brain does not function properly because you are pregnant.

The Claimant took maternity leave and returned to work on 28 June 2018.  The Respondent had failed to apply for a DBS for the Claimant and so she was unable to work the last few days in June and into July and then the nursery was closed for the summer.  The Claimant was given a new contract with increased pay, which was signed on 13 July 2018, but for the month of July the Respondent paid the Claimant holiday pay calculated using a SMP rate based on the old contract.

Upon the Claimant’s return to work in September 2018 the Claimant resigned.  In her resignation letter she referred to having been discriminated against because she was pregnant and had taken maternity leave and her belief that all of the issues regarding pay and the change of contract would have been dealt with more smoothly and efficiently had she not done so.

The Claimant went on to make claims in the ET for pregnancy and maternity discrimination, constructive unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal (ET)

The Claimant’s claims succeeded.  The ET held that, on the balance of probabilities, there were no financial difficulties which could justify not putting the Claimant on a new contract until she returned form maternity leave.  They further held that the Respondent took advantage of the fact that the Claimant was going on maternity leave to save money by delaying the start of her permanent contract until after she returned and that this was an act of unfavourable treatment because of pregnancy and maternity discrimination. They also held that the remarks made by Ms Bailey constituted unfavourable treatment because of the pregnancy.

With regards to the Claimant’s holiday pay, the Respondent was unable to provide any justification as to why the Claimant had been paid at the SMP rate for July and August and held that they had done so to save the business money.  The ET also upheld that Claimant’s claim for unauthorised deduction from wages from the point at which the new contract superseded the old contract (13 July 2018) as she was underpaid from that time.

Finally, the Claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal succeeded as the Claimant’s continued failure to pay the Claimant the sums due under the 2018 contract was a repudiatory breach of contract which entitled the Claimant to resign.

The Employment Tribunal listed a remedy hearing to take place on 5 November 2019.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Ms Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comment on the case: “This case is a clear example of an employer treating an employee differently from the moment she announces her pregnancy and attempting to use the employee’s maternity leave to their financial advantage. A pregnant employee’s right to avail themselves of maternity leave and not suffer a detriment as a result is enshrined in law employers should make sure they have a solid understanding of a pregnant employee’s rights so as to not fall foul of the law.”

The decision of the Employment Tribunal in Mrs Amin v Calvary Pre-School Limited (ET/3201703/2018) can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

175 Reviews

Anonymous

efficient, responsive and effective

Posted 7 hours ago

Andrew B

Very good service

Posted 7 hours ago

Anonymous

Excellent service, compassionate and a good outcome

Posted 1 day ago

Anonymous

I had an employment issue which required legal advice. Chris was very supportive and knowledgeable, resulting in an optimum resolution in my favour. Would definitely recommend.

Posted 1 week ago

David M

Very professional and first-rate advice. I would use again. With thanks,

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Got the job done swiftly without going too much in to detail.

Posted 1 week ago

Derek W

Redmans dealt with my case very efficiently and I was happy with the outcome.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Timely professional advice!

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Very good service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

I was in contact with Chris and then worked with Caroline on an employment matter. I was very pleased with the service and professionalism throughout, and came away with satisfied with the outcome. Would happily recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Nikki

Received advice re employment law. Chris was very helpful and advised accordingly. Would happily recommend them and if ever I need help again, will not think twice before using them.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 2 months ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 months ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 months ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 months ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 2 months ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 2 months ago