Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Mrs S Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0301/18/BA the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) considered whether the Employment Tribunal had been correct when they refused to pay a Claimant a statutory redundancy payment in addition to her contractual redundancy payment.

The facts in Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust

Mrs Ugradar (the ‘Claimant’) was employed on ‘Agenda for change’ terms and conditions by Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (the Respondent’).  Section 16 of those terms and conditions provided for a contractual redundancy payment.  Whilst the definition of redundancy and the conditions of qualification broadly mirrored the statutory scheme set out in Part 11 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it allowed for a payment of one month’s pay for each complete year of service.

There was an express provision in the contract governing the relationship between the contractual payment and the statutory payment.  It said: ‘NHS contractual redundancy is an enhancement to an employee’s statutory redundancy entitlement; the statutory payment being offset against any contractual payment.’

The Claimant’s post at the Respondent’s disappeared in a reorganisation.  The Respondent put forward various positions which they felt constituted suitable alternative employment, but all of them were rejected by the Claimant as not, in fact, being suitable.  Her employment was terminated by the Respondent and she did not receive a redundancy payment.  She brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal (“ET”) for both the contractual redundancy payment and the statutory redundancy payment.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Claimant was entitled to an enhanced contractual redundancy payment of £43,949.04 under the provisions of her contract of employment.

The ET found that the Claimant was entitled to the payment as she had reasonably refused the Respondent’s offer of alternative employment, which was not suitable, but capped her award at £25,000 by virtue of the statutory cap which applies to contractual claims being heard in the ET.  It declined to order the Respondent to pay the Claimant a statutory redundancy payment of £5,868, relying on the clause in the Claimant’s contract of employment which stated that the statutory payment was to be offset against the enhanced payment.

The Claimant appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

At the EAT, the Claimant relied on the case Eden v Skills and Works Solutions Limited to argue that the statutory cap did not apply to a statutory redundancy payment.

The Respondent attempted to argue that as the Claimant had already pursued a cause of action and obtained a judgment, she was precluded from bringing an additional claim in respect of the same cause of action and relied on the case Fraser v HLMAD Limited.  It argued that the full contractual payment, which included the statutory element, was one cause of action, effectively one claim for a redundancy payment which included two elements.

The EAT agreed with the Claimant and said that she was entitled to be paid the statutory redundancy payment, in addition to the contractual payment which was capped at £25,000. The held that the case Fraser v HLMAD Limited did not apply in this case as there was, in fact, two separate causes of action, not just one.  The Claimant was entitled to the statutory payment, even in her contract of employment had attempted to restrict her rights to that payment.

The Claimant’s contractual payment was £43,949.04 and the Respondent was entitled to set off against that figure the amount of £5,868.00 which was the statutory payment. Therefore, the actual amount the Claimant was entitled to was £38,071.04.  The statutory cap of £25,000 had to be applied to that figure, but it did not apply to the statutory payment, which the Claimant was entitled to receive as well.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Mrs S Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comments on the case: “This case highlights that the statutory cap of £25,000 which has stayed the same for twenty-five years, needs to be increased.  At its current level, there is a real risk that it will not adequately compensate some employees for the financial losses they have suffered in a breach of contract claim.’

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Mrs S Ugradar v Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0301/18/BA can be found here.


Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Contact us

    Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

    T: 020 3397 3603
    E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
    W: www.redmans.co.uk


    4.76 Average

    235 Reviews

    Paul O

    Chris & Rana guided me through a redundancy discussion. Prompt & patient assistance with the documents & meetings. Clear advice & fast responses regarding negotiations. Would definitely recommend & would use again without hesitation.

    Posted 1 month ago


    Outstanding, efficient service. Thank you so much!

    Posted 1 month ago

    Jaswant S

    Very very happy with the good service I got Thank you so much for your help

    Posted 1 month ago


    Mel and Chris were fantastic and supportive throughout! 1000% recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Emma D

    Good responsive service

    Posted 1 month ago

    Mike T

    Good efficient service.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Brenda G

    Very professional and helpful

    Posted 1 month ago

    Charles A

    Chris Hadrill was recommended to me when I found myself in need of a solicitor at very short notice. He contacted me almost immediately to arrange a call. Chris handled my case in a professional and timely manner and kept me notified throughout. Chris inspired confidence and made me feel I was being cared for. If ever I'm in need of legal representation, I would not hesitate to contact Chris. And will gladly recommend him to family and friends.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Rosalind R

    I was very happy with the service that I received from Redmans Solicitors. They were able to advise me accordingly with regards to my employment matter and stay within the agreed costing.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Karl B

    Caroline and Chris were so helpful and friendly. Couldn't of asked for a better service.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Dimitrios P

    Excellent, professional service, in time and within the expected value.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Barbara K

    Everything quickly and fairly. Very professional. Thank you.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Sabrina J

    I received a efficient professional service during the whole process of liasing between myself and my former employer to getting all forms signed and receiving my redundancy payment in full in the summer of this year.

    Posted 1 month ago


    I received legal advice on a redundancy settlement agreement from Redmans Solicitors and was very impressed by the quality of their service. Chris Hadrill is highly experienced in settlement matters and was especially understanding of the particulars of my case, going out of his way to ensure that it was resolved quickly and with the utmost professionalism. I have no hesitation in recommending Redmans to anyone in need of employment advice and settlement resolution.

    Posted 1 month ago


    Excellent service, with full explanations of everything needed. Both Chris and Mel answered all emails very promptly and were personable and efficient.

    Posted 1 month ago


    I would like to thank Chris Hadrill, in particular who handled my case, for all his hard work, expertise and dedication. He listened with empathy and offered suitable advice, which made me feel valued and confident through a difficult time. I would highly recommend Chris and the team at Redmans Solicitors. Thank you.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Yann G

    Yann Guezennec / Chris Hadrill - Thanks for the detailed, informed and professional advice for my settlement. When comprise is the rule I felt we could have been maybe a bit more aggressive from the start. However an acceptable outcome considering the situation. Thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Valentina D

    Great service from Mel, she was very good at explaining every part of the settlement agreement and very efficient dealing with the HR team. Very professional team, I would definitely use them again in future if the opportunity came up.

    Posted 2 months ago

    Olaf S

    I was very happy with the service that I have received. Thank You Regards

    Posted 2 months ago

    Rebecca A

    I had a wonderful solicitor called Caroline who was so helpful and gave me all the information I need and explained everything in detail so I was crystal clear. Would highly recommend if you are in need of a solicitor!

    Posted 2 months ago

    Gareth J

    Very efficient, helpful and pragmatic support from Caroline. Happy to work with my requirements / suggestions but also made some very good points which helped to achieve a higher settlement amount. Would highly recommend Caroline and Chris.

    Posted 2 months ago