Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In the case of Nosworthy v Instinctif Partners Limited EAT/0100/18/RN, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (the ‘EAT”) held that the Employment Tribunal (the ‘ET’) had been correct in dismissing the claims made by an employee who had lost the right to receive cash payment, loan notes and new shares in her employer when she voluntarily resigned from her employer.

The Facts in Nosworthy v Instinctif Partners Limited

Miss Nosworthy (the ‘Claimant’) was given a 2% shareholding in her employer, Communications Operations Limited, which was then sold with the rest of the company’s shares when it was acquired by Instinctif Partners (the ‘Respondent’). As a result, the Claimant was entitled to deferred payment for part of her shares under a three year ‘earn-out’ scheme in the Share Purchase Agreement which provided for her to receive cash payments, loan notes and new shares in the Respondent.

These arrangements served as a mechanism by the Respondent to incentivise retention of key employees. Bad leaver provisions meant the Claimant received £143 for her shares and forfeited loan notes when she voluntarily resigned in 2016 as she lost their entitlement to earn-out payments and had to sell her loan notes and new shares back to the Respondent at their acquisition cost.

The decision of the Employment Tribunal

The Claimant brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal and challenged the bad leaver provisions on three grounds:

  1. that they were “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable
  2. that they amounted to an unlawful penalty clause
  3. that they amounted to an unlawful deduction from her wage

All arguments raised by the Claimant were rejected by the Employment Tribunal and she went on to appeal the decision in the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal

Unconscionable Bargain

Here the EAT reminded itself that this required that “one party has to have been disadvantaged in some relevant way as regards the other party, that other party must have exploited that disadvantage in some morally culpable manner, and the resulting transaction must be overreaching and oppressive”. It held that there was no evidence of serious disadvantage whether through poverty, or ignorance or lack of advice (the Claimant had confirmed she had received legal advice on the agreement at the time of entering into them).  The first ground of appeal therefore failed.

Unlawful Penalty Clause

The EAT was also unconvinced by the argument that such provisions were an unlawful penalty clause. A penalty clause relates to damages for breach of contract which are purely a deterrent against a breach rather than a genuine pre-estimate of loss. Penalty clauses are generally unenforceable.  Thus, a penalty has to operate on a breach of contract.  The investment agreement, to which the Claimant was a party, contained a covenant that she would not become a bad leaver (as defined in the Articles of Association). Whilst it was acknowledged that the Claimant had breached the investment agreement, the Respondent was not relying on this breach to enforce the bad leaver provisions; it was simply applying the standalone rules set out in its Articles of Association. Therefore, the issue of penalties was not relevant in this case.

Unlawful Deduction from Wages

Finally, the EAT held that this could not amount to an unlawful deduction from wages under section 27(2)(e) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.  Whilst the claim in respect of earn-out shares and loan notes could be said to be payable in connection with employment, they were deferred consideration for the sale of her shares and therefore provided to the Claimant as a vendor of shares, not in her capacity as a worker.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of Nosworthy v Instinctif Partners Limited UKEAT/0100/18/RN

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comments on the case: “This case highlights the importance of employees taking legal advice prior to entering into a share scheme as widely drafted bad leaver provisions can be enforceable.’

The decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal in UKEAT/0100/18/RN can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.78 Average

143 Reviews

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

Extremely efficient. Mel made a difficult situation bearable and gave good clear guidance thoughout.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Thanks Chris and Sacha I was reassured throughout the process and a happy outcome

Posted 2 weeks ago

Edward F

Good and clear employment advice

Posted 2 weeks ago

Richard O

Chris at Redmans is my go-to legal expert when it comes to employee-related matters. His depth of knowledge, experience and considered approach to problems and their solutions is highly valuable. I cannot recommend Redmans highly enough.

Posted 4 weeks ago

Rory Y

They provide me with timely and clear advice!

Posted 1 month ago

Steven C

Redmans handled my settlement with my employer quickly, decisively and to a standard that I was very happy with. I would in similar circumstances contract them again

Posted 1 month ago

Deepthi K

Transparent. Clear communication. Prompt reply’s. Saves lot of time. Very satisfied.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Chris and Sacha did a fantastic job and negotiated a significant better settlement agreement

Posted 1 month ago

Dino D

I did get a very swift and god service from Redmans

Posted 1 month ago

Stephanie H

Clear, prompt, effective support from Chris which has been very much appreciated. Thank you again.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

I would highly recommend Redmans Solicitors, the team were very friendly and my case was dealt with professionally and efficiently. Thank you!

Posted 2 months ago

Shane M

Very professional, welcome advice at a crucial time. Always available and reasonable cost.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

My case was relatively straight-forward. But even so, working with Redmans was easy, quick, professional & clear. Many thanks

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

The team were very helpful and answered all my questions regarding my redundancy. Initially I had a call with one of the representatives who escalated my request to a suitable employment solicitor. We arranged a call to discuss the settlement and she helped answer all my questions. We then mainly contacted through email which helped resolve the settlement quickly and convently. Thanks for all the help.

Posted 2 months ago

Djaouida T

You have good communication.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional. A highly recommended company for employment related issues.

Posted 2 months ago

Anonymous

Very professional service.

Posted 2 months ago

Brittany

I was very grateful for Redmans to treat my case with respect and discretion. At the time, I was very new to London and it was meaningful to have someone on my side and win the case for me. Without any doubt, I would definitely recommend Redmans Solicitors to anyone who is in need of it.

Posted 10 months ago

Jake L

Chris is very professional and calm. Very attentive and patient, been a positive experience having Chris represent me, and would recommend him.

Posted 11 months ago