Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Disability is a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 (‘EqA’). Disability is defined in the EqA as a person having “a physical or mental impairment that has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.” Schedule 1 of the Act explains that “long-term” means likely to last for at least 12 months.

This recent case provides an excellent analysis of the three main issues which can arise from disability in the workplace: the duty to make reasonable adjustments (s20 & 21), disability discrimination (s15), and harassment (s26). Sections 39/40 provide that an employer must not discriminate against or harass an employee, and must make reasonable adjustments. Before addressing the facts of the case, it is useful to remind ourselves of what the EqA says about each of these issues.

The relevant law – the Equality Act 2010

Disability discrimination – s15 EqA

This section states that an employer discriminates against a disabled employee if the employee is treated unfavourably by the employer because of something arising in consequence of the employee’s disability. The employer must be aware (or must reasonably have been expected to be aware) of the disability. They will also have a defence if it can show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

Harassment – s26 EqA

Harassment is defined, in relation to disability, as a person (A) harassing another (B) if A engages in unwanted conduct related to the disability, and the conduct violates B’s dignity or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment for B. Things that must be taken into account include B’s perception, the other circumstances, and what is reasonable in terms of the effect of the conduct.

Reasonable adjustments – s20(3) EqA

An employer is required to make reasonable adjustments where a provision, criterion, or practice (‘PCP’) puts a disabled person at a substantial disadvantage in comparison with those who are not disabled. Substantial is defined as “more than minor or trivial” later in the EqA. The Claimant bears the burden of proof in proving each PCP’s disadvantage in comparison to a non-disabled colleague.

Background

The Claimant, Mrs Evans had experienced episodes of anxiety disorder, social phobia, and depression since 1999, on and off. She joined the Respondent as an Accounts Receivable Specialist in 2012, with a Ms Lewis as her team leader. She didn’t inform the Respondent of her disability at the time of her interview.

2013

In early 2013, the Claimant began experiencing a major episode of depression, and was often seen by Ms Lewis to be in tears at her desk. She took time off later in 2013 with anxiety. On her return, she wasn’t referred to occupational health, and her workload was increased until it was one of the busiest on her team, despite her being part-time.

2014

2014 saw another negative performance review, and the Claimant being told she was to be placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) by Ms Lewis. Ms Lewis did not in fact follow up on that, and it was later found that she had merely used it as a threat to the Claimant. Ms Lewis did not in fact follow up on that, and it was later found that she had merely used it as a threat to the Claimant. The build-up of all of the stress led to the Claimant being hospitalised in September 2014.

2015

In 2015, a new monitoring tool was introduced, which the Claimant explained to Ms Lewis she felt put pressure on the whole team, but that she in particular found it difficult to cope with. Ms Lewis informed the Claimant that she needed to cope better with her anxiety. By 2016, the Claimant felt, and even said to Ms Lewis, that she felt she was being treated differently to the rest of the team. Ms Lewis stated that “we’re all feeling the pressure”, and informed the Claimant that while she was off, others had to deal with her workload.

Grievances

The Claimant raised a grievance, which upheld the Claimant’s complaint against Ms Lewis. However, following this grievance process, there was a delay in referring the Claimant to any Employee Assistance or Group Income Protection procedures by Ms Smith. Also, despite occupational health directions that the Claimant should be redeployed, the Claimant was put under pressure to return to her previous role. These events all led the Claimant to raise a second grievance. This grievance process concluded that there had been no harassment by Ms Smith, and although there had been a delay, it hadn’t impacted the outcome.

Following this second grievance, the Claimant’s HR contact informed her that depending on the outcome of a review, they might need to consider whether, as a result of her current ill-health she was able to continue in employment. The Claimant raised a third grievance, on the basis that the HR contact hadn’t informed her of opportunities for redeployment and had threatened to terminate her employment. This grievance was not upheld.

Conclusions

The tribunal concluded that the Respondent knew about Ms Evans’ disability. Of the 22 items which the Claimant alleged in the Schedule, the Tribunal concluded that she succeeded in 8 of those. They were:

  1. Not referring to occupational health (reasonable adjustment) – adopting a practice of non-referral was a failure to make reasonable adjustments for the Claimant.  
  2. Comments relating to anxiety (harassment) – unwanted conduct in relation to disability.  
  3. Anxiety comments (discrimination) – this amounted to unfavourable treatment as a consequence of the disability.  
  4. ‘Others covering your workload’ comments (harassment) – unwanted behaviour whose purpose was to create a hostile environment.  
  5. Requiring a certain workload (reasonable adjustments)
  6. Repeated suggestions for reconciliation with Ms Lewis (discrimination) – unfavourable treatment as a result of her long-term time off, therefore as a result of her disability.  
  7. Instituting formal absence management (discrimination) – unfavourable treatment as a result of the Claimant’s ill-health, and therefore as a result of the disability.  

Link to judgment: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5dcd586fe5274a07aad0a545/Mrs_A_Evans_v_GE_Capital_Funding_Services_Limited_-1600139.2018-_Judgment.pdf

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

    Your first name (required)

    Your last name (required)

    Your email (required)

    Your telephone number (required)

    Brief details of your enquiry

    Testimonials

    4.81 Average

    313 Reviews

    Anonymous

    Sacha was very thorough and very helpful, with great advice on when to act and when to wait on my case.

    Posted 2 days ago

    Anonymous

    I have been very pleased with the support I got from Redmans Solicitors on my case with my employer. Caroline has always helped me to put things in perspective and showed me different scenarios ultimately to help me taking the right decision. She was very professional and always available when I needed, and at the same time also emphatic which I found also really important to establish a strong relationship. Will definitely recommend!

    Posted 4 days ago

    Anonymous

    Prompt and efficient response to my enquiries. Excellent negotiating skills with my employer which considerably improved the terms of my settlement agreement.

    Posted 4 days ago

    Anonymous

    Very quick and professional service , Rana was very helpful

    Posted 5 days ago

    James G

    Very professional, knowledgeable and kept me informed at every stage of my case. I would highly recommend Redmans.

    Posted 6 days ago

    Pravina P

    Chris was really good and help solve my issues with current company. I would recommend him to anyone.

    Posted 1 week ago

    Paul L

    Sacha was extremely helpful in my matter. I would not hesitate you use Sacha or Redmonds again. Everyone was very helpful.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Monique N

    I had Mel Chin helping me with a settlement and she was very professional and reliable throughout my case. Mel provided me with a good understanding of what was happening and gave suggestions on routes I could take. My case was resolved and closed promptly although the opposing side were very difficult to deal with. A very big thank you to Mel and Chris.

    Posted 2 weeks ago

    Jackie C

    My first ever experience needing the services of a solicitor; cannot speak highly enough of Mel and Chris’s personable, reassuring and straight to the point advice in dealing with my settlement agreement. They put me at ease during an extremely stressful time. I am equally as happy with the outcome, as l am their professional services.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    ""

    Really happy with the service. All very efficient. Mel rattled through things very fast, however was great whenever I needed to stop and ask a question! Would definitely return to Redmans if I ever needed Legal advice.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Peter F

    Very helpful and clear advice, would highly recommend.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    William A

    Second time I have had to use Redmans. They did not disappoint. They are fast , efficient and friendly. I have already recommended them to friends and colleagues. I hope I dont have to use them again but if I have to , they are the solicitors for me.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Fleeta C

    Great service with tantastic communications. The solicitor responsible is extremely knowledgeable and was responsible for bringing a timely and desired solution.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Veronica M

    Extremely helpful, starting from a request for advice at very short notice, to dedicating time for me to understand and review all documents thoroughly.

    Posted 3 weeks ago

    Sophie R

    Very efficient and professional service. Chris was very empathetic, knowledgeable and personable. Highly recommended.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Melanie M

    Very happy with the detailed advice provided from Redmans. They also helped me to secure a higher settlement than originally offered by my employer and were extremely diligent. I first spoke with Chris at relatively short notice and then Sacha dealt with my case. Would definitely recommend and use again in the future if needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anonymous

    Redmans helped me with a work related issue, which was resolved quickly and professionally. I would definitely recommend this company.

    Posted 1 month ago

    James F

    Great people, really friendly and professional helped with everything that I needed.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Anusha S

    My case was handled by Sacha who was very thorough and helped me to achieve a good outcome with my employer. Sacha was very personal, professional and helped me during quite a stressful time, so I am hugely grateful to her and to Redmans. This was my first time engaging with a law firm so I wasn't sure what to expect but I can definitely say that it was a good experience overall and I ended up better off due to having the help of an experienced and proactive solicitor on my side.

    Posted 1 month ago

    Diane P

    So grateful that I contacted Redmans to deal with my Redundancy Agreement. Everything from the initial call to the completion of the matter was professional, efficient and effective. I was listened to, had everything explained simply and kept informed of every step. I received super advice and the costs were very competitive. I would highly recommend them to anyone seeking similar help. First class service - thank you

    Posted 1 month ago

    Chris L

    It was a very efficient and effective service - Would recommend.

    Posted 1 month ago