Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

In BC and others v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland and Others [2018] CSOH 104 the Court of Session held that, in occupations which require regulatory oversight, and where it is in the public interest to do so, private communications (including WhatsApp messages) may be used as evidence in disciplinary proceedings.

The facts in BC and others v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland and Others

In 2016 a detective constable led an investigation into sexual offences within the Police Service of Scotland. In the course of the investigation, the detective found messages sent via WhatsApp on a phone belonging to a suspect, who was a police officer. The detective considered the content of the messages and passed them to constables in the Professional Standards Department. The WhatsApp messages included sexist, racist, homophobic and other discriminatory content and also included crime scene photos of current investigations. 

Misconduct charges under The Police Service of Scotland (Conduct) Regulations 2014 (the “2014 Regulations”) were brought against a number of officers.  The 2014 Regulations apply when an officer is on or off duty and cover areas such as honesty and integrity, equality and diversity, discreditable conduct and challenging and reporting improper conduct. 

The Police Service of Scotland Regulations 2013/35 (“2013 Regulations”) set out the restrictions on the private life of a constable. The 2013 Regulations state “A constable must at all times abstain from any activity which is likely to interfere with the impartial discharge of that constable’s duties or which is likely to give rise to the impression amongst members of the public that it may so interfere.”

Those officers brought a petition in the Outer House of the Court of Session complaining that using their WhatsApp messages to bring non-criminal misconduct proceedings against them was unlawful and a breach of their Article 8 rights.

The law

Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”) provides that:

  • Everyone has the right to respect for their private and family life, their home and their correspondence (Article 8(1)).
  • There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except as accords with the law and as is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others (Article 8(2)).

It is unlawful for public authorities to act in a way that is incompatible with the ECHR.  Courts and tribunals must, as far as possible, give effect to primary and subordinate legislation in a way that is compatible with the ECHR.

The decision of the Court of Suspension

The Outer House of the Court of Session refused the police officer’s petition.

The first question that the Court addressed was whether a right to privacy even exists in Scotland. Lord Bannatyne was persuaded that there does exist a common law right of privacy in Scotland as it is a “core value inherent in a democratic and civilised state”.

The next question was whether the officers could have a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to the messages.  Lord Bannatyne found that any ordinary member of the public using WhatsApp could have a reasonable expectation of privacy.  However, unlike the general public, the officers are subject to the 2014 Regulations and 2013 Regulations. When becoming an officer, they accepted that their right to privacy is limited to the extent set out in the 2013 Regulations.

The final question was whether interference in the officers’ right to privacy was justified under Article 8(2). Lord Bannatyne took the view that it was on the basis that it was necessary for public safety. Since maintaining public confidence is essential for successful policing, anything which exposes a mind-set where the public’s right to be treated fairly is called into question, would put public safety at risk.

Our solicitors’ views on the case of BC and others v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland and Others

Sacha Barrett, a Senior Associate in the employment department at Redmans, made the following comments on the case ‘This is an important case as it is the first time that a Scottish court has expressly declared that there is a common law right to privacy in Scotland.  It is also one of the first decisions in England and Wales or Scotland considering how the content of WhatsApp messages might be used in a work context. For individuals subject to professional standards or working there will be limits on the right to keep such messages private. This includes solicitors, barristers, doctors, and financial services workers but may extend to individuals working in many other sectors.’

The decision of the Court of Session in [2018] CSOH 104 can be found here.

About

Redmans Employment Team deal with employment matters for both employers and employees, including drafting employment contracts and policies, advising employers and employees on compromise agreements, handling day-to-day HR issues, advising on restructures, and handling Employment Tribunal cases for both employers and employees Call 020 3397 3603 to speak to one of the members of our employment team or email us on enquiries@redmans.co.uk. Redmans have offices in Richmond, Chiswick, Hammersmith, Fulham, Kingston, Wimbledon, Ealing, Kings Cross and Marylebone (meetings strictly by appointment only).

Want to talk to an expert employment law solicitor?

You'll receive a callback from a specialist within an hour

Share →

Our awards

Request a callback

Your name

Your email

Your telephone number

Contact us

Please feel free to discuss your own position and concerns. Contact your nearest office on:

T: 020 3397 3603
E: enquiries@redmans.co.uk
W: www.redmans.co.uk

Testimonials

4.76 Average

164 Reviews

Samantha K

Absolutely brilliant thank you. Caroline Lewis is a legend

Posted 1 week ago

Anonymous

The legal advice was clear and helpful.

Posted 1 week ago

Davinder P

Good Service

Posted 2 weeks ago

Adrian V

I was using Redmans services for a Settlement Agreement. Very quick and professional service. The outcome was favourable and I was very pleased with the amendments and results. Pretty glad to recommend them for any type of legal advice.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Very responsive, efficient, clear and supportive. Thank you! Highly recommend.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Tiago S

Chris was always prompt to help me with legal matters that are beyond my comprehension and very helpful leasing with my former employer. I would recommend Redmans Solicitors to everyone who needs help.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Anonymous

Fast and professional advice tailored to what was needed. Thanks for your help Chris Hadrill and team.

Posted 2 weeks ago

Peter S

Really pleased with the outcome and the advice I had from Chris and Sacha.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Harika A

Redmans solicitor's helped me with my settlement agreement, Chris has been very helpful throughout the process.He was very prompt in his responses and made my settlement look simple.Special thanks to Caroline for her efficient communication, thorough explaination of contract terminology and negotiations.I highly reccommend Redmans solicitors for anyone seeking employment related legal help.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Good and quick service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ricky D

Very satisfying to be assured of such attention and professionalism.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Excellent service - thankyou

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Efficient, timely and friendly support and advice

Posted 3 weeks ago

Ahmed S

They are always on hand when you need them and provide support even when its not necessary.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Nemen S

Wonderful experience.Chris was very responsive and provided an excellent service. A real professional who I would recommend to anyone

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Their guidance was clear and they provided me with all the information I required. Friendly yet professional

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris @ Redmans assisted me with an employment issue. Firstly, he was very proactive in coming back to my initial enquiry and then helped to clearly lay out the options that I had in relation to my position. He then assisted with the preparation of my case, which led to a very satisfactory outcome. I would highly recommend the quality of service & professionalism offered by Redmans Solicitors.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Great service

Posted 3 weeks ago

Anonymous

Chris was very effective and decisive in dealing with my matter. I felt guided, and the pressure to make decisions was taken off my shoulders; he knew what needed to be done and I was happy to follow his advice. The result of the legal dispute was a great success for me. He is also kind and personable. The only thing that I would say it could be improved, is the accuracy of cost estimation at the beginning: not many activites, that could not have been forseen had to take place, but costs went up more than double in the end. Overall very good and trustworthy. I would definately recommend and use Redmans services again.

Posted 3 weeks ago

Liz P

An excellent professional service was provided by Chris Hadrill and Mel Chin. Efficient and trustworthy - would highly recommend this company.

Posted 1 month ago

Anonymous

Redmans Solicitors were great. They were able to advice me quickly and efficiently! I would recommend them, as a good solicitors to use.

Posted 1 month ago